53 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
53 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|||
|
cat crashess
|
|||
|
Article 56 of comp.dcom.telecom:
|
|||
|
Path: csustan!lll-lcc!styx!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!kitty.UUCP!larry
|
|||
|
From: larry@kitty.UUCP
|
|||
|
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
|
|||
|
Subject: Submission for mod.telecom ("Crashing" a Central Office)
|
|||
|
Message-ID: <8704261435.AA29050@seismo.CSS.GOV>
|
|||
|
Date: 26 Apr 87 14:35:33 GMT
|
|||
|
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
|
|||
|
Distribution: world
|
|||
|
Organization: The ARPA Internet
|
|||
|
Lines: 35
|
|||
|
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> Finally, If both my best friend and myself set call forwarding to
|
|||
|
> each other, what happens when someone calls?
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> [ ... Also, if you forward to someone who forwards to
|
|||
|
> you the call goes "click", "click", busy. The two clicks are the
|
|||
|
> trunks going between your central offices. If you do this to someone
|
|||
|
> on the same ESS machine, it gives you a busy immediately. This is
|
|||
|
> useful especially if you have your calls forwarded from home to work
|
|||
|
> and vice versa. You can safely forward your calls bi-directionned until
|
|||
|
> you get home and clear the forwarding. Also, I crashed our central office
|
|||
|
> forwarding once to someone on the same machine (that was 12 years ago).
|
|||
|
> --jsol]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: the comment about "crashing" the central office...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If anyone finds this hard to believe, I know of a specific example
|
|||
|
where there was a bug in a particular generic software release used on some
|
|||
|
early #2 ESS machines which had just been installed by New York Telephone
|
|||
|
to replace SxS CDO's during the mid 70's.
|
|||
|
By using three telephone lines, and setting them up to forward as
|
|||
|
A --> B --> C --> A, a call from another telephone to A as a "seed" would
|
|||
|
force the #2 ESS to crash and switch to the standby processor, whereupon
|
|||
|
a second occurence would wipe out the standby processor until the call
|
|||
|
attempt was discontinued. This situation would also set off remote alarms
|
|||
|
at the SCC which handled these unattended #2 ESS machines.
|
|||
|
Needless to say, a software patch was quickly developed by WECO...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The above scenario was probably unanticipated by the WECO team
|
|||
|
that designed and wrote the software. The public, however, seems to have
|
|||
|
a knack for discovering these flaws rather quickly.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
<> Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, New York
|
|||
|
<> UUCP: {allegra|ames|boulder|decvax|rocksanne|watmath}!sunybcs!kitty!larry
|
|||
|
<> VOICE: 716/688-1231 {hplabs|ihnp4|mtune|seismo|utzoo}!/
|
|||
|
<> FAX: 716/741-9635 {G1,G2,G3 modes} "Have you hugged your cat today?"
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
well?
|