476 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
476 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21287 S1/General Interest
|
||
|
05-Dec-95 19:33:30
|
||
|
Sb: #Newcomer needs hdwe!
|
||
|
Fm: Chris Shearer Coope 76666,3026
|
||
|
To: all
|
||
|
|
||
|
Howdy y'all!
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'm an electrical engineer (at least that's what it says on the diploma) but
|
||
|
it's been a long time since I did anything besides software. Anyway, I've got
|
||
|
some ideas for little projects I'd like to play around with, and to make them
|
||
|
happen I need a simple microprocessor board. Nothing fancy, although a C
|
||
|
compiler would be nice <grin>, but since it's mostly for fun I really don't
|
||
|
want to invest multiple hundreds of dollars in this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Does anybody (1) sell a simple board with processor and support circuitry that
|
||
|
I can hook up +5V (and ground too!) and RS-232 to my PC, and some simple PC
|
||
|
software to download programs? Or (2) a book about some common microprocessor
|
||
|
that takes me step by step through what I have to do to build such a board on
|
||
|
my own? The problem is that I work for myself now and I'm a stingy bastard of
|
||
|
a boss, so the most advanced equipment I have is a voltmeter, so I really can't
|
||
|
play around and try different things 'cuz I have almost no way to debug
|
||
|
problems.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For that matter, how about some way to turn my PC into an oscilloscope (for
|
||
|
almost no money, of course)?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanks all,
|
||
|
Chris
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is 1 Reply.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21293 S1/General Interest
|
||
|
07-Dec-95 02:09:20
|
||
|
Sb: #21287-#Newcomer needs hdwe!
|
||
|
Fm: Neil Morrison 72777,3013
|
||
|
To: Chris Shearer Coope 76666,3026 (X)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Look on large news stands for:-
|
||
|
Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar
|
||
|
Midnight Engineer
|
||
|
Both magazines are dedicated to just these areas.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is 1 Reply.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21294 S1/General Interest
|
||
|
07-Dec-95 10:11:04
|
||
|
Sb: #21293-Newcomer needs hdwe!
|
||
|
Fm: Chris Shearer Coope 76666,3026
|
||
|
To: Neil Morrison 72777,3013
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanks, will check them out!
|
||
|
|
||
|
I had kinda hoped somebody who actually builds & sells such a thing would pop
|
||
|
up and offer their services, but looks like I will have to actually do some
|
||
|
footwork <g>.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chris
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21290 S1/General Interest
|
||
|
06-Dec-95 06:36:15
|
||
|
Sb: #CoCo xfer problems
|
||
|
Fm: John L. Wilkerson Jr. 71140,77
|
||
|
To: ALL
|
||
|
|
||
|
My CoCo3 refuses to upload/download from compuserve and several other
|
||
|
systems/boards. Then, some systems it works fine on. This problem is
|
||
|
consistent with all terminal programs and protocols.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Any ideas?
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is 1 Reply.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21291 S1/General Interest
|
||
|
06-Dec-95 10:03:45
|
||
|
Sb: #21290-#CoCo xfer problems
|
||
|
Fm: Wayne Day 76703,376
|
||
|
To: John L. Wilkerson Jr. 71140,77 (X)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Look for commonalities... and eliminate the usual suspects. Is your modem in
|
||
|
fact working correctly? Is your logon path capable of handling 8-bit data?
|
||
|
Are you really equipped with the right software?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Too many possibilities to offer anything resembling a sensible answer to your
|
||
|
problem, so 'fess up with more info.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Wayne
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is 1 Reply.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21292 S1/General Interest
|
||
|
06-Dec-95 19:34:11
|
||
|
Sb: #21291-CoCo xfer problems
|
||
|
Fm: John L. Wilkerson Jr. 71140,77
|
||
|
To: Wayne Day 76703,376
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well, I cannot transfer files to from the following type systems: CompuServe
|
||
|
, Wildcat systems (Can use zmodem though), Major BBS systems,and clones
|
||
|
thereof.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I use SuperComm, Kbcom, rz/sz... all exhibit the same problems.
|
||
|
|
||
|
_perhaps_ my modem settings could be off...... _perhaps_ my /T2 could be off.
|
||
|
|
||
|
BUT.... then, there is no standard settings to use. My modem is a 2400 with
|
||
|
MNP capabilities. I use the SACIA package.....
|
||
|
|
||
|
I keep the bps rate set to 4800 BPS, and use the mnp/compression.
|
||
|
|
||
|
At one time, all this _did_ work..... at times is still will, intermittently.
|
||
|
99% of the time, though... timeout city.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- John
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21296 S1/General Interest
|
||
|
09-Dec-95 03:38:06
|
||
|
Sb: F-Keys under Termcap
|
||
|
Fm: David Breeding 72330,2051
|
||
|
To: ALL
|
||
|
|
||
|
How does, or can, the system or a program use the Function-key definitions? Is
|
||
|
there any way for a program to sense which F-key has been pressed except to
|
||
|
read the sequence of characters being sent from stdin (usually, I guess),
|
||
|
probably beginning scanning when ESC is read, and then compare the input with
|
||
|
known values?
|
||
|
|
||
|
What I am dealing with is that my system, a Delmar operating under G-Windows,
|
||
|
has its keys defined under VGA defs. F1=\E[M, F2=\E[N, etc.
|
||
|
|
||
|
My Internet server uses F1-F4 for key controls, Exit, etc.. but looks for
|
||
|
either vt100 or Sun Systems F-key defs... I need to translate F1=\EOQ,
|
||
|
F2=\EOR, etc (I know this is off by 1 char from my termcap defs, but this is
|
||
|
what "it" wants)..
|
||
|
|
||
|
I can read the sequence, and then write from a translation table, but is there
|
||
|
a simpler way?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- David Breeding --
|
||
|
CompuServe : 72330,2051 Delphi : DBREEDING
|
||
|
*** Composed with InfoXpress/OSK Vr. 1.02 & VED Vr. 2.4.0 ***
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21284 S5/OS9 Users Group
|
||
|
03-Dec-95 10:22:20
|
||
|
Sb: #Lost signals
|
||
|
Fm: Ian Langmead 71307,1417
|
||
|
To: all
|
||
|
|
||
|
Has any one experience of lost signals when using OS9.
|
||
|
Someone undertaking some development work with me has indicated that signals
|
||
|
advising that pipe entries appear to be lost by the operating system. I am not
|
||
|
an OS9 expert so am
|
||
|
looking for help.
|
||
|
When dealing with a signal, should one check to see if any other signal request
|
||
|
have been queued before finishing the action.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanks.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is 1 Reply.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21286 S5/OS9 Users Group
|
||
|
04-Dec-95 15:52:01
|
||
|
Sb: #21284-Lost signals
|
||
|
Fm: Ian J Shearer 100410,2733
|
||
|
To: Ian Langmead 71307,1417 (X)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ian
|
||
|
|
||
|
It's easy to think you're losing signals when it's not actually happening.
|
||
|
There are a few things to watch out for.
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Signals are guaranteed not lost from one task to the signal handler of
|
||
|
another. If you set a flag in the handler which is then checked in the main
|
||
|
code (i.e. the standard approach) you might not check the flag soon enough. The
|
||
|
answer is to use _os_sigmask() to queue new signals until the old one is dealt
|
||
|
with.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. If you're using events, then be aware that waiting on an event unmasks
|
||
|
signals just the same as sleeping does. Check the return value to see that the
|
||
|
event has actually done what you think and that you haven't been woken by a
|
||
|
signal.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. The same goes for when you're waiting for a child process to die.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Hope this helps.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-Ian J Shearer, Onyx Systems Ltd.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21283 S7/Telecommunications
|
||
|
02-Dec-95 20:50:34
|
||
|
Sb: #21278-#Internet with OS-9
|
||
|
Fm: Ian Hodgson 72177,1762
|
||
|
To: David Breeding 72330,2051 (X)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Time to jump in.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A shell account allows you to have text and file transfer interface via your
|
||
|
local service provider. Access to FTP, Newsgroups, Mail, etc. are done by using
|
||
|
programs that run ON YOUR SERVICE PROVIDER'S COMPUTER; you just have what
|
||
|
amounts to a medium dumb terminal. The programs are probably called FTP (for
|
||
|
FTP), TIN (for Internet News), and ELM (electronic mail) or PINE for email. But
|
||
|
remember, your computer just acts as a terminal, and the only special protocol
|
||
|
that might be required is something like VT100 emulation. In fact, providers
|
||
|
SHOULD be able to provide for a number of different terminal types, but mine
|
||
|
has suppressed the terminal type on login question and assumes ANSI, which lets
|
||
|
my CoCo out.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you use a PPP connection, your service provider acts as a gateway, and most
|
||
|
of the action takes place on your local computer. This means that you have to
|
||
|
have some fairly sophisticated software to know about the various protocols, of
|
||
|
which there are really at least two different levels.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The lower level interface uses a protocol called TCP/IP, which specifies packet
|
||
|
frame details as well as how the packet are handled over the network. At a
|
||
|
higher level are the protocols used by FTP, email (POP3 and SMTP), and, of
|
||
|
course, The World Wide Web (HTML).
|
||
|
|
||
|
I have no idea why anyone would want to get the code from Netscape. Netscape is
|
||
|
a multi-function browser which handles HTML, FTP, Usenet (news) and, to a
|
||
|
limited extent, SMTP. Each of these is a clearly defined high level protocol
|
||
|
and anyone with the capability should be able to write programs to use them.
|
||
|
HTML, for example, is a text markup language. You use an editor to create HTML
|
||
|
code (which is text with a bunch of markers, in concept much like using Ved to
|
||
|
produce a Vprint file) and a viewer to look at it. The viewer is basically a
|
||
|
text formatter, with output to the screen. It provides for various colors for
|
||
|
text and backgrounds, graphics (which must be GIF or JPEG), centering,
|
||
|
different font sizes, bullets, numbered lists, emphasis of various sorts,
|
||
|
blinking text, tables and a number of other features. These are all defined in
|
||
|
the HTML standards; version 3.0 is current, though most browsers EXCEPT for
|
||
|
Netscape only handle 2.0. Not to worry, one of the requirements of HTML
|
||
|
browsers is that they will gracefully ignore markers they don't understand, so
|
||
|
if you try to read HTML 3.0 on an older browser, all that will happen is that
|
||
|
some of the formatting won't look right.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can get the standards for HTML on the Web; if anyone needs it I can find
|
||
|
the URL (Uniform Resource Locator, i.e. address).
|
||
|
|
||
|
There would be no point in trying to write a browser for the CoCo; it simply
|
||
|
doesn't have the power nor the graphics capabilities. OSK is a different story,
|
||
|
and there should be no problem doing this, but the competition is indeed
|
||
|
Netscape, and since you can get an out of date 386 PC to run it for a couple of
|
||
|
hundred bucks it hardly seems worthwhile to write one for OSK.
|
||
|
|
||
|
By the way, to those who think they would have no use for the graphics
|
||
|
capabilities of the Web, take a lesson from me. I too was amongst the group who
|
||
|
felt that way, until I got the chance to start playing on the Web. It is very
|
||
|
addicitive BECAUSE of the neat formatting and excellent graphics. Once you've
|
||
|
tried it there is no going back to text. Good thing my service provider gives
|
||
|
me unlimited time for $30/month.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ian
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is 1 Reply.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21285 S7/Telecommunications
|
||
|
03-Dec-95 13:26:25
|
||
|
Sb: #21283-#Internet with OS-9
|
||
|
Fm: David Breeding 72330,2051
|
||
|
To: Ian Hodgson 72177,1762 (X)
|
||
|
|
||
|
> Time to jump in.
|
||
|
|
||
|
And thanks for doing so, Ian. You have supplied some good insightful info on
|
||
|
this matter.
|
||
|
|
||
|
RE: Shell acct.
|
||
|
> In fact, providers SHOULD be able to
|
||
|
> provide for a number of different terminal types, but mine has suppressed
|
||
|
> the terminal type on login question and assumes ANSI, which lets my CoCo
|
||
|
> out.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I think I might get by with this. Unless there are quite a few differences
|
||
|
between systems, I log onto a local PC BBS which provides ANSI support, and
|
||
|
using the VT100 emulations of G-Windows, does a pretty good job of screen
|
||
|
display. A few stray, most often just ignored codes, but quite satisfactory.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> I have no idea why anyone would want to get the code from Netscape.
|
||
|
> Netscape is a multi-function browser which handles HTML, FTP, Usenet
|
||
|
> (news) and, to a limited extent, SMTP. Each of these is a clearly defined
|
||
|
> high level protocol and anyone with the capability should be able to write
|
||
|
> programs to use them.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Right. I can't remember who suggested that, but I doubt that would be
|
||
|
necessary, or productive. Unless they were thinking of taking a shortcut in
|
||
|
code writing but it would probably take some fairly extensive editing anyway...
|
||
|
|
||
|
> There would be no point in trying to write a browser for the CoCo; it
|
||
|
> simply doesn't have the power nor the graphics capabilities.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yes, I think this would be pretty well agreed upon.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> OSK is a
|
||
|
> different story, and there should be no problem doing this, but the
|
||
|
> competition is indeed Netscape, and since you can get an out of date 386
|
||
|
> PC to run it for a couple of hundred bucks it hardly seems worthwhile to
|
||
|
> write one for OSK.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yes. This would be the easiest and quickest way out. This is no doubt the
|
||
|
route most have taken.
|
||
|
|
||
|
However, if it were not a too big project to write a browser, it would add a
|
||
|
neat feature to our system. The only problem is that surely there is some big
|
||
|
obstacle to it or someone would surely have already done it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> By the way, to those who think they would have no use for the graphics
|
||
|
> capabilities of the Web, take a lesson from me. I too was amongst the
|
||
|
> group who felt that way, until I got the chance to start playing on the
|
||
|
> Web. It is very addicitive BECAUSE of the neat formatting and excellent
|
||
|
> graphics. Once you've tried it there is no going back to text. Good thing
|
||
|
> my service provider gives me unlimited time for $30/month.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You are probably quite right. Perhaps if I got involved, I would get hooked on
|
||
|
it. However, if you have been following my messages, the proposed service that
|
||
|
I may be getting will be too expensive to allow a very heavy addiction. :-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanks again for all the fine observations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- David Breeding --
|
||
|
CompuServe : 72330,2051 Delphi : DBREEDING
|
||
|
*** Composed with InfoXpress/OSK Vr. 1.02 & VED Vr. 2.4.0 ***
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is 1 Reply.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21288 S7/Telecommunications
|
||
|
06-Dec-95 00:19:28
|
||
|
Sb: #21285-#Internet with OS-9
|
||
|
Fm: Ian Hodgson 72177,1762
|
||
|
To: David Breeding 72330,2051 (X)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Just a few more notes about Web stuff.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> The only problem is that surely there is some big obstacle to it or
|
||
|
> someone would surely have already done it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I can't see any big obstacle, other than the fact that HTML is fairly
|
||
|
complicated, particularly if you allow in-line GIF and JPEG graphics, both of
|
||
|
which require integrated viewers that respect the HTML positioning commands.
|
||
|
|
||
|
But the basis shouldn't be any harder than writing any other text formatter,
|
||
|
such as Vprint. (Maybe I should start bugging Bob to write a browser; he is
|
||
|
struggling along with a shell account now. When I started pushing him for a
|
||
|
fancy formatter he wrote Vprint, maybe it would work twice <grin>!)
|
||
|
|
||
|
HTML formats text on the basis of commands such as <br> for line break, <p> for
|
||
|
paragraph marker, <center> and </center> to define centered blocks, and so on.
|
||
|
It provides for half a dozen different headers, bullets, numbered lists,
|
||
|
tables, graphics and a bunch of other things. As I said, the full definition is
|
||
|
available on the Web (I didn't get the chance to look up where I got it) so it
|
||
|
should be a straight forward, if somewhat tedious, job to write a formatter.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Incidentally, one of the nice features of HTML is that all formatting is
|
||
|
usually specified in general terms, i.e. you specify header type 3 rather than
|
||
|
Times Roman 14 point bold, etc. This lets the recipient's browser decide what
|
||
|
the header will actually look like, and makes the source code completely
|
||
|
machine independent.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I am just getting heavily into writing HTML source in conjunction with my job,
|
||
|
and I must say it is great fun.
|
||
|
|
||
|
And don't complain about your proposed server's high prices disallowing a heavy
|
||
|
addiction; this may well be a blessing in disguise. Gosh, that reminds me, one
|
||
|
of these days I will have to wash the dishes! Haven't had time for quite a
|
||
|
while!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ian
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is 1 Reply.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21295 S7/Telecommunications
|
||
|
07-Dec-95 22:03:30
|
||
|
Sb: #21288-Internet with OS-9
|
||
|
Fm: David Breeding 72330,2051
|
||
|
To: Ian Hodgson 72177,1762
|
||
|
|
||
|
> Just a few more notes about Web stuff.
|
||
|
|
||
|
And your observations are quite welcome.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> I can't see any big obstacle, other than the fact that HTML is fairly
|
||
|
> complicated, particularly if you allow in-line GIF and JPEG graphics, both
|
||
|
> of which require integrated viewers that respect the HTML positioning
|
||
|
> commands.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The (apparent to me) need to include all these protocols is one thing that
|
||
|
precludes my tackling it. I must admit that my familiarity with really what
|
||
|
all _is_ involved with a browser is quite scanty.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another little gotcha, I guess, would be the fact that the GIF protocol now
|
||
|
requires licensing, too, doesn't it?
|
||
|
|
||
|
It surprises me that no one has undertaken this project, though, given all the
|
||
|
magnificent applications that our great people _have_ made available. It seems
|
||
|
that that someone would have begun this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The only explanation I can come up with is that with our diversified systems,
|
||
|
and an app of this kind would be GUI-dependent, that no one sees a market for
|
||
|
it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> But the basis shouldn't be any harder than writing any other text
|
||
|
> formatter, such as Vprint. (Maybe I should start bugging Bob to write a
|
||
|
> browser; he is struggling along with a shell account now.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yes, he has told us about this. As you no doubt have seen, this is the avenue
|
||
|
I am looking at at this moment.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> When I started
|
||
|
> pushing him for a fancy formatter he wrote Vprint, maybe it would work
|
||
|
> twice <grin>!)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bob would be a good prospect alright.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I have a vague idea of how the HTML protocol works. I've seen examples in
|
||
|
NET-related magazines, but of course I don't have detailed specifics.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> As
|
||
|
> I said, the full definition is available on the Web (I didn't get the
|
||
|
> chance to look up where I got it) so it should be a straight forward, if
|
||
|
> somewhat tedious, job to write a formatter.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yes, it would be somewhat tedious. It would no doubt be a formidable project.
|
||
|
However, quite a showpiece if it were made quite workable.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> Incidentally, one of the nice features of HTML is that all formatting is
|
||
|
> usually specified in general terms, i.e. you specify header type 3 rather
|
||
|
> than Times Roman 14 point bold, etc. This lets the recipient's browser
|
||
|
> decide what the header will actually look like, and makes the source code
|
||
|
> completely machine independent.
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> I am just getting heavily into writing HTML source in conjunction with my
|
||
|
> job, and I must say it is great fun.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yes, I believe it _would_ be quite intriguing. I had entertained the notion
|
||
|
about trying to write a browser, but so far, the task has looked too daunting
|
||
|
to begin.
|
||
|
|
||
|
> And don't complain about your proposed server's high prices disallowing a
|
||
|
> heavy addiction; this may well be a blessing in disguise. Gosh, that
|
||
|
> reminds me, one of these days I will have to wash the dishes! Haven't had
|
||
|
> time for quite a while!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well, heh-heh.. I have a bad habit of letting the dishes go even _without_ a
|
||
|
browser <G>
|
||
|
|
||
|
I don't know what would happen to me if I were to get involved with browsing..
|
||
|
To be honest, and seriously, this is one of my concerns about getting involved
|
||
|
with browsin' <G>
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- David Breeding --
|
||
|
CompuServe : 72330,2051 Delphi : DBREEDING
|
||
|
*** Composed with InfoXpress/OSK Vr. 1.02 & VED Vr. 2.4.0 ***
|
||
|
|
||
|
#: 21289 S10/OS9/6809 (CoCo)
|
||
|
06-Dec-95 06:33:38
|
||
|
Sb: HD partition info?
|
||
|
Fm: John L. Wilkerson Jr. 71140,77
|
||
|
To: ALL
|
||
|
|
||
|
i am looking for Hard drivre partitiion software.... any good choices for the
|
||
|
latest, or rather most recent B&B software?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanbnks
|
||
|
j
|
||
|
|
||
|
[D
|
||
|
|
||
|
Press <CR> !>
|