1312 lines
48 KiB
Plaintext
1312 lines
48 KiB
Plaintext
|
read new nonstop follow
|
||
|
87086 1-MAY 15:59 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 86999)
|
||
|
From: 01GEN40 To: DSRTFOX
|
||
|
|
||
|
I do not claim to know all there is to know (technically or otherwise
|
||
|
about the "Clipper Chip" or file encryption in general. All I can say is that
|
||
|
I do not like what this government is doing, (real or implied). It just
|
||
|
seems to me that it is taking (away) too much and not giving in return. In my
|
||
|
opinion, banning the export of file encryption programs and forcing ALL devi
|
||
|
ces
|
||
|
to contain the "Clipper Chip" is not in my best interest. In my opinion, the
|
||
|
government has this attitude that they DO NOT need a "warrant" to "wire tap"
|
||
|
or otherwise SPY on its citizens. PGP was not exported to other countries.
|
||
|
Phil Zimmerman U/Led it to a BBS and it snowballed from there.
|
||
|
In MY opinion...
|
||
|
I feel that WE THE PEOPLE should have the right to maintain privacy in
|
||
|
anything we do not want the general public (or government) to know. By the
|
||
|
Constitution, we have the right to FREE SPEECH which is what I am exercising
|
||
|
in this message. If I do not want this message to be general knowledge, I
|
||
|
should be allowed to employ any means at my disposal to keep it that way and
|
||
|
not be subjected to the scrutiny of ANY government just because they might
|
||
|
think that I was one of the BAD GUYS. In MY opinion...
|
||
|
LONG LIVE OS-9! <FOREVER>
|
||
|
|
||
|
01gen40@delphi.com
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87088 1-MAY 18:37 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 87086)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: 01GEN40 (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the case of the Clipper, you would still have the option of using a
|
||
|
different type of software encryption just as you do now. Most people would
|
||
|
use the hardware clipper routine simply because it is convenient and faster.
|
||
|
ALL data would'nt be encrypted either. So you aren't being FORCED to use
|
||
|
the Clipper technology...
|
||
|
It is really a waste of government money, as the drug dealers would use
|
||
|
different
|
||
|
shcemes anyway to protect their records. I guess the gov't figures they can
|
||
|
throw a charge at them for using something else???
|
||
|
I was just adding some facts. It's really nothing to be alarmed at, like the
|
||
|
wait for a security check before being allowed to buy a handgun. No real harm
|
||
|
in that... but criminals won't be buying through legitimate means anyway, and
|
||
|
thoes who go crazy and suddenly shoot lots of people usually already have the
|
||
|
gun, they don't go buy the day they start shooting! Legislation like this is of
|
||
|
little real value, but it seems to appease a large percentage of the population
|
||
|
who can't seem to
|
||
|
see anything but one way. I guess they feel they accomplished SOMETHING in
|
||
|
initiating such near useless legislation. The best GUN CONTROL law occurred in
|
||
|
a small town outside of Atlanta. Every male head of household was REQUIRED to
|
||
|
own somw type of firearm
|
||
|
! Guess what? Crime rate plunged overnight! Who wants to burglarize a
|
||
|
neighborhood where you KNOW 100% there is a gun owner in there?
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87095 1-MAY 18:50 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 87086)
|
||
|
From: JOHNREED To: 01GEN40 (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
> I do not claim to know all there is to know (technically or otherwise
|
||
|
> about the "Clipper Chip" or file encryption in general. All I can say is
|
||
|
that
|
||
|
> I do not like what this government is doing, (real or implied). It just
|
||
|
> seems to me that it is taking (away) too much and not giving in return. In
|
||
|
my
|
||
|
|
||
|
Right. I don't think this is a really big deal all by itself,
|
||
|
just like some well-intentioned lawmakers trying to ban certain
|
||
|
types of guns, "no-knock" searches, and a bunch of cops in
|
||
|
California who got tried twice for the same charge (yeah, they
|
||
|
should have been found guilty the first time, but they were not,
|
||
|
and that should have been the end of it).
|
||
|
|
||
|
None of these things really affect my personal life much, they are
|
||
|
just examples of little "nibbles" at the basic rights that I was
|
||
|
taught were mine forever.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I heard a great quote the other day - can't remember who said
|
||
|
it or the exact words, but this is close --
|
||
|
|
||
|
" ... to take freedom away from Americans, you have to know how
|
||
|
to cook a frog. If you drop him in hot water, he jumps right
|
||
|
out. The trick is to put him in cold water, then turn on the
|
||
|
heat. By the time he figures out something is wrong, it's
|
||
|
too late .."
|
||
|
|
||
|
********************************
|
||
|
"Don't take life too serious - it ain't nohow permanent"
|
||
|
(Pogo)
|
||
|
|
||
|
John R. Wainwright <<CIS -- 72517,676>> <<DELPHI -- JOHNREED>>
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87100 1-MAY 21:36 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 87088)
|
||
|
From: WDTV5 To: DSRTFOX
|
||
|
|
||
|
Nice bit of legislation! I'm interested in finding out what town, how far
|
||
|
the crime rate dropped, etc. Those are the kind of facts that those of us
|
||
|
who happen to think the 2nd ammendment is the currently slowly warming frog
|
||
|
1~?~?~?~?~?~?~?~?~?be one track minds that would slowly disarm the general
|
||
|
pubkllic
|
||
|
do they can do as they darned well please with us. Thats not what made this
|
||
|
country what it once was, and which I'd like to see brought back to life.
|
||
|
So where was it, all the glorious details please! Gene Heskett WDTV5
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87102 1-MAY 23:44 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 87100)
|
||
|
From: WA2EGP To: WDTV5
|
||
|
|
||
|
I don't know about that town but I remember when Florida enacted what appeared
|
||
|
to be a an easier gun control law. Just about anybody could get one as
|
||
|
opposed to the way it was before. The media was predicting a blood-bath.
|
||
|
So far, I have heard of no blood-bath in Florida due to this easing of gun
|
||
|
control. Hmmmmmm........... BTW, in NJ "they" want to ban junkyards to accept
|
||
|
cars from pre-81 to reduce pollution from the clunkers and tax every radio
|
||
|
transmitter over 5 watts because of RF pollution. As one trooper put it,
|
||
|
"They don't want gun control, they want people control." This could be
|
||
|
applied to just about any kind of "control".
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87109 2-MAY 20:28 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 87102)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: WDTV5
|
||
|
|
||
|
I don't recall the town now, sorry! It was on the news here sometime about
|
||
|
two years ago. The police were even holding training seminars for citizens
|
||
|
and advising on types of guns to purchase. Shotguns were suggested for people
|
||
|
who had trouble firing the .38s and 9mms the police were letting some shoot.
|
||
|
Good idea!
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87110 2-MAY 20:31 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 87109)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: WA2EGP
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'm a member of two old car clubs. We have proven pretty much that such
|
||
|
legislation is utterly useless! If an old car is kept up, it produces no more
|
||
|
polution than a newer car in most cases. A two year old car with 150,000 miles
|
||
|
and needing a ring job does more damage than my 63 Rambler with a new engine.
|
||
|
One club member sent copies of the Mass. inspection reports for his 76 Pacer
|
||
|
and 88 Mini-Van (Chrysler V-6) to his rep. The Pacer was way under the
|
||
|
allowable standards while the van barely passed! The van had about 30,000
|
||
|
miles on it, the Pacer over 100,000! The Pacer had a head job (valve grind
|
||
|
and new seals) at around 80,000 miles, that was all.. still original
|
||
|
rings!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87118 2-MAY 22:38 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 87109)
|
||
|
From: WDTV5 To: DSRTFOX (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Frankly, I agree. The only problem with that is then somebody will want
|
||
|
to saw it off below the limit, not knowing what the limit is, and get into
|
||
|
all kinds of trouble with the firearms act of 1934, the year I was born!
|
||
|
In My Own Not So Humble View, the prosecution really should oughta go
|
||
|
look for some gink that just held up the 7-11 & managed to get away without
|
||
|
being made rather leaky by that same sawed off shotgun! To me, you have the
|
||
|
God given right to defend whats yours *with* whatever means is at your
|
||
|
disposal. Maybe I'm a cranky old f--- but I've been working for a living
|
||
|
for 46 of my 59 years, looking for work maybe a total of 4 months in the
|
||
|
last 30 years. I pay my taxes and think they should *not* be used for the
|
||
|
latest so-called social engineering idea, but for pay and gear for law
|
||
|
enforcement, and jails to put them in the first 2 times, unless its
|
||
|
personal injury related, as in shooting the clerk. Once is more than enough
|
||
|
for that kind of person. End of sermon.
|
||
|
Sorry if I offend anyone, but its a first amendment and second amendment
|
||
|
freedom we're talking about here folks. Gene Heskett, WDTV5@delphi.com
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87147 3-MAY 23:21 OSK Applications
|
||
|
RE: PGP for OSK? (Re: Msg 87110)
|
||
|
From: WA2EGP To: DSRTFOX (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I know what you mean. I had a 73 Toyota Corolla that passed the 85 California
|
||
|
standards....even at 185,000 miles. Not even a cat converter. Got damn good
|
||
|
milage too (29.5 highway) with a 2 speed auto trans. Too bad I had to dump it,
|
||
|
got body cancer from all the @$%&*! salt they put on the road. Talk about
|
||
|
pollution! They only major work was a head gasket job every few years. If I
|
||
|
could have only gotten a new body.......
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87087 1-MAY 18:25 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Current Periodicals (Re: Msg 87046)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: JEVESTAL
|
||
|
|
||
|
Patch09 is a "joint product" of FARNA and Conect. I had the idea, and asked
|
||
|
Rick for some help in compiling the best patches/utilities. He added the
|
||
|
auto-patch routine himself. We both market it for about the same price!
|
||
|
I sell the disk set alone for $7.50 + $2.50 S&H (per order), while Rick sells
|
||
|
for $3.50 + $4.00 S&H. If all you want is the disk set, you get a better deal
|
||
|
from Rick. BUT.... if you want the "OS-9 Quick Reference Guide" along with
|
||
|
the disks from me, the disk price is only $5. The QRG is $7.50, you get both
|
||
|
for $12.50. Most people who have the QRG say it is very helpful and they
|
||
|
rarely pull the manuals off the shelf now. I also have one for OSK now at
|
||
|
$8.50 (+ $2.50 S&H per order). It is virtually the same, but 60 pages versus
|
||
|
44 for OS-9 (6809).
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87089 1-MAY 18:41 Programmers Den
|
||
|
RE: Real Make... (Re: Msg 87074)
|
||
|
From: RHELLER To: JOHNREED
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
I found it on the lucy machine.
|
||
|
|
||
|
?
|
||
|
(Which are available lots of places...)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'm also going need a whole batch of unix-ish things: like awk, a rm clone
|
||
|
(or a version of del that does not barf if asked to delete a file which is not
|
||
|
there (a really silly error: "I could not delete your file, because it was not
|
||
|
there.")), and a UNIX-like mv command (or a version of rename that won't barf if
|
||
|
|
||
|
asked to rename a file and happens to give a full (but identical) path for the
|
||
|
destination (i.e. "rename dir/foo dir/foo.bak", where dir is exactly the same
|
||
|
for both args.).
|
||
|
|
||
|
I am trying to build X11R5, and the makefiles are full of this stuff. I have
|
||
|
"fixed" some of the rules to deal with some of this, but it would be nice
|
||
|
if I had some more uniform fixes. I don't really want to manually edit a
|
||
|
zillion
|
||
|
Makefiles -- I have ported imake and have written an osk.cf file. If I can
|
||
|
get things to behave like UNIX, at least enough to get this beast compiled, it
|
||
|
would be a big plus. (I still have to deal with a somewhat braindead X server,
|
||
|
but that is nether here nor there, and no, the Microware X is not want I want -
|
||
|
just about all of the OSK X11 servers are written to support an "AT keyboard" --
|
||
|
|
||
|
one of those silly things the guys with the blue letters invented just to
|
||
|
torment
|
||
|
people. There is a German company who, like me, prefers DEC's LK201 keyboards.
|
||
|
Just that their X server has other interesting problems...)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Robert
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87090 1-MAY 18:42 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87072)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: LMCCLURE
|
||
|
|
||
|
Inkjets also have one drawback- they are more expensive on a per page
|
||
|
consumable cost than even laser printers. Many people assume Lasers to be high,
|
||
|
but the consumable cost is actually among the lowest of any printer.... about
|
||
|
2-3 cents a page. Dot matrix
|
||
|
runs around 4-5 cents, and ink jets around 6-7 cents. This is assuming new
|
||
|
cartridges/ribbons, not refills, which would bring costdown to dot-matrix on
|
||
|
the ink jets, I think. They aren't very fast either, most run around 2ppm or
|
||
|
140 or less CPI.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87093 1-MAY 18:49 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87084)
|
||
|
From: JOHNREED To: 10BAUD (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
> I must admit I don't do color printing, or printing that would really
|
||
|
> benefit from color. That may be why I'm so satisfied with my 24 pin
|
||
|
> black and white Epson Action Printer 3250.
|
||
|
> Are you implying that a b/w ink jet is as inexpensive as a 24 pin?
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
|
||
|
Just saw a Deskjet 500 at a local office supply store for
|
||
|
$249.00 -- that is a lot less than I paid for mine
|
||
|
a while back.
|
||
|
|
||
|
********************************
|
||
|
"Don't take life too serious - it ain't nohow permanent"
|
||
|
(Pogo)
|
||
|
|
||
|
John R. Wainwright <<CIS -- 72517,676>> <<DELPHI -- JOHNREED>>
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87107 2-MAY 02:45 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87093)
|
||
|
From: ISC To: JOHNREED
|
||
|
|
||
|
John,
|
||
|
|
||
|
I find my HP Deskjet 500 far faster than my old 9-pin dot matrix from
|
||
|
Rat Shack, and I refill my ink cartridge with Shaffer "Skrip" ink for
|
||
|
about $2 a bottle! I can refill my cartridge between 4 or 5 times
|
||
|
with one bottle of ink. That brings my cost per page down lower
|
||
|
than buying or re-inking those ribbons from Rat Shack and, I would
|
||
|
guess, lower than a laser printer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bill
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87111 2-MAY 20:36 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87107)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: ISC
|
||
|
|
||
|
Traditionally, an ink-jet costa about 7 cents per page (give or take a cent)
|
||
|
in consummables IF all new consumables are used. Refilling definately takes
|
||
|
a big chunk out of that!
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87114 2-MAY 21:56 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87107)
|
||
|
From: MRUPGRADE To: ISC
|
||
|
|
||
|
RE I find HP faster then my 9 pin from Radio Shack.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bill,,, there is (grin) nothing slower then a Radio Shack 9 pin printer.
|
||
|
Cept perhaps,, an older model teletype @ 110 baud.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Til then,,, Terry Simons
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87116 2-MAY 21:58 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87111)
|
||
|
From: MRUPGRADE To: DSRTFOX (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
RE> Ink jets tradittionally cost 7 cents apage.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thnkas of r that tip, Frank. I7ll be a loooong time before this po kid
|
||
|
gets an ink jet.
|
||
|
Til then,,, Terry Simons
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87126 3-MAY 02:24 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87114)
|
||
|
From: ISC To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
Wow, Terry, you go back. The slowest transmission speed I ever saw was
|
||
|
300 baud on the old Model 15 Teletype page printers! You are correct,
|
||
|
though, I never saw anything slower than a Rat Shack 9-pin. The HP not
|
||
|
only runs at 9600 baud compared to 2400 for the dot matrix, but also
|
||
|
prints in both directions with 360 x 300 dpi resolution at (I forget)
|
||
|
how many pages per minute. It has 3 resident fonts, portrait and
|
||
|
landscape printing plus 10, 17 and 20 cpi selectable from the panel.
|
||
|
It also has an envelope feeder and 15 manually selectable character
|
||
|
sets. (Max speed is 19,200 baud, not 9600 mentioned above.) Using
|
||
|
the Epson FX-80 emulator, it exactly reproduces Max-10 output with
|
||
|
the Epson FX-80 driver that comes with Max-10. (Max-10 resolution is
|
||
|
72 dpi as it always was.) It is possible to get the printer to do
|
||
|
just about anything using the HP PCL language commands sent from
|
||
|
basic or OS-9. I paid over $400 for mine, but saw them advertised
|
||
|
today for $269!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bill
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87132 3-MAY 05:36 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87107)
|
||
|
From: COCOKIWI To: ISC
|
||
|
|
||
|
I just got a replacable insert cartridge...the ink holder just pops in the
|
||
|
print cartridge.....$51.00 with 5 inserts,I figure the inserts can be refulled
|
||
|
Dennis
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87133 3-MAY 07:32 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87084)
|
||
|
From: LMCCLURE To: 10BAUD (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Are you implying that a b/w ink jet is as inexpensive
|
||
|
as a 24 pin?"
|
||
|
|
||
|
What gave you that idea? I *was*, however, pointing out that that
|
||
|
your statement:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"All the ink jets seem to be priced over $400."
|
||
|
|
||
|
..did not reflect the reality of the marketplace. I am aware that
|
||
|
there a 24-pin dot matrix printers that sell new for less then the
|
||
|
least expensive ink jet (which currently appears to be the Epson
|
||
|
Stylus 300, which I have seen selling for around $230 from some
|
||
|
sources).
|
||
|
|
||
|
I do feel that anyone in the market for a new low end printer would
|
||
|
be much more likely to be satisfied with an ink jet than a 24-pin
|
||
|
impact printer, unless they simply could not afford the small cost
|
||
|
differential. (Assuming the 24-pin model they were considering *was*
|
||
|
actually one that was less expensive than an ink jet).
|
||
|
|
||
|
24-pin printers are better for some uses (i.e., I would not recommend
|
||
|
an inkjet for long listings, as the vast majority have no tractor
|
||
|
feed option of any kind...the Canon BJ-300 and 330 being two exceptions),
|
||
|
just as I would recommend a 9-pin printer over a 24-pin in certain
|
||
|
situations. (They key in that case being the durability of the printhead
|
||
|
pins moreso than the slight cost savings).
|
||
|
|
||
|
As I recall, this discussion originally stemmed from someone looking
|
||
|
for a printer, who had no need of color, and primarily was concerned
|
||
|
with text output. For that, I still stand by my recommendation of an
|
||
|
inkjet over a 24-pin dot matrix.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87138 3-MAY 19:08 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87107)
|
||
|
From: JOHNREED To: ISC
|
||
|
|
||
|
> Rat Shack, and I refill my ink cartridge with Shaffer "Skrip" ink for
|
||
|
> about $2 a bottle! I can refill my cartridge between 4 or 5 times
|
||
|
> with one bottle of ink. That brings my cost per page down lower
|
||
|
|
||
|
Hey Bill, is that the original type cartridge or the new
|
||
|
51626 "high capacity" one? If you are refilling the new
|
||
|
one, where did you drill the hole? I have seen ads for
|
||
|
new type cartridges modified so they can be refilled, but
|
||
|
never tried them. (I have refilled the older ones).
|
||
|
|
||
|
********************************
|
||
|
"Don't take life too serious - it ain't nohow permanent"
|
||
|
(Pogo)
|
||
|
|
||
|
John R. Wainwright <<CIS -- 72517,676>> <<DELPHI -- JOHNREED>>
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87149 3-MAY 23:26 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87114)
|
||
|
From: WA2EGP To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
What about a Radio Shack daisy wheel printer?
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87151 4-MAY 00:13 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87149)
|
||
|
From: MRUPGRADE To: WA2EGP (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
RE> What about a Radio Shack daisy wheel printer?
|
||
|
Perhaps you're right,, theh RS daisy wheel and a 110 baud Teletype
|
||
|
could be a close race.
|
||
|
Til then,,, Terry Simons
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87155 4-MAY 01:55 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87138)
|
||
|
From: ISC To: JOHNREED (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
John,
|
||
|
|
||
|
That is the original type cartridge, but I just bought a new high-
|
||
|
capacity cartridge (51626A) which HAS a plastic guide hole in the
|
||
|
middle of the arrow on the top which MUST be a refill hole.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bill
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87156 4-MAY 02:06 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87138)
|
||
|
From: COCOKIWI To: JOHNREED (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I just brought a HP- cartridge system..with replacement cart...in the PRINT
|
||
|
HEAD CASE.......you get Print head case and FIVE cartridges for $51.00
|
||
|
<very nice>....one removes the cap from the cartridge,place it over the print
|
||
|
head ,insert the cartridge....pump button till ink shows in the cap<white pad>
|
||
|
remove cap,and place it in printer..............
|
||
|
the ink cartridge<high capacity> has a plastic piece on top with hole in it!
|
||
|
one,I think goes in through that........I have a color Cartridge THAT is refull
|
||
|
able......has full holes in top of Cartridge.......
|
||
|
I got the Hp stuff from SAM's Warehouse!
|
||
|
Dennis
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87157 4-MAY 02:09 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Printers (Re: Msg 87155)
|
||
|
From: COCOKIWI To: ISC (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
actualy it "THE" org full hole!<grin> has seal inside,look at little book
|
||
|
that comes with it! " do not puncture seal as ink could come out!"
|
||
|
<grin>
|
||
|
Dennis
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87091 1-MAY 18:43 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: msdos (Re: Msg 87083)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: COLORSYSTEMS
|
||
|
|
||
|
I have a version of Elite*Xfer, but it only does COCO (DECB) disks. They have
|
||
|
a version (most likely newer than mine!!) that will read/write Os-9 as well?
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87101 1-MAY 22:19 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: msdos (Re: Msg 87091)
|
||
|
From: COLORSYSTEMS To: DSRTFOX
|
||
|
|
||
|
> I have a version of Elite*Xfer, but it only does COCO (DECB) disks. They
|
||
|
> have a version (most likely newer than mine!!) that will read/write Os-9
|
||
|
> as well?
|
||
|
|
||
|
You know, you're absolutely right! It can only read DECB disks at this time,
|
||
|
and I have no idea if they have any plans on adding OS9 support. I suppose
|
||
|
then, for OS-9 you'd also have to have the RSDos utility to transfer the OS-9
|
||
|
file to a DECB formatted disk first, then take that to the PC with Elite*Xfer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
------------------------------------
|
||
|
Zack C Sessions
|
||
|
|
||
|
"We did not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors,
|
||
|
we borrowed it from our descendants." Ancient proverb
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87105 2-MAY 01:58 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: msdos (Re: Msg 87091)
|
||
|
From: JEVESTAL To: DSRTFOX
|
||
|
|
||
|
> I have a version of Elite*Xfer, but it only does COCO (DECB) disks. They
|
||
|
> have a version (most likely newer than mine!!) that will read/write Os-9
|
||
|
> as well?
|
||
|
|
||
|
I talked to Elite*Software recently and Elite*Xfer only works with
|
||
|
RS-DOS disks. They don't even sell or support any software for OS-9.
|
||
|
They are now an MS-DOS company but still sell the old Elite* RS-DOS
|
||
|
stuff at about 75% of their original costs. I would have loved to
|
||
|
see an OS-9 Level 2 copy of Elite*Word, but they never supported
|
||
|
OS-9. They did release an OS-9 Level 1 version of Elite*Word but
|
||
|
it was buggy and unreliable, I actually own a copy!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Jim
|
||
|
|
||
|
======================== InfoXpress 01.01.00 OS-9/6809 ======================
|
||
|
| Narnia BBS: 24 hours serving CoCo OS-9 users
|
||
|
----|---- StG network: sysop@Narnia "Exclusively OS-9"
|
||
|
| Delphi: JEVestal@delphi.com
|
||
|
Marysville, CA InterNet: JEVestal@narnia.wa.com
|
||
|
| or : JEVestal@citrus.sac.ca.us
|
||
|
(916) 743-2617 Voice: (916) 743-4264:1 Corinthians 1:18 & Romans 1:16
|
||
|
=============================================================================
|
||
|
Jim Vestal: Assistant editor of The International OS-9 Underground,
|
||
|
"Magazine dedicated to OS-9/OSK Users Everywhere
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87106 2-MAY 02:21 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: msdos (Re: Msg 87079)
|
||
|
From: COCOKIWI To: NETCRUISER (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
there is one in the PC sig called Color.zip if I remember rightly...one of the
|
||
|
drives in your PC must be a 360k to use it.....Dennis
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87135 3-MAY 18:43 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: msdos (Re: Msg 87101)
|
||
|
From: CPERRAULT To: COLORSYSTEMS
|
||
|
|
||
|
Actually there are quite a few options for OS9. Gale Force sells
|
||
|
Sdisk which comes with tools to read/write Dos disks<as well as
|
||
|
RSdos>, and he also sells MSF<?> which I think it is called. It is a
|
||
|
MSdos file manager you can add to the boot to make it real easy to
|
||
|
read/write to dos disks. It is available for people using Sdisk.
|
||
|
>Chris<
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87092 1-MAY 18:46 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Home manager (Re: Msg 87082)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
Terry, if you are going to stick with the CoCo, OS-9 could come in real handy,
|
||
|
and you'll find that the Coco has a lot of new tricks and life left in it!
|
||
|
I use van der Poel's OS-9 Mail List now... it handles large and small files
|
||
|
just fine. Definately don't want to have to switch everything over! If I were
|
||
|
having problems I would consider it though.
|
||
|
Do get me a copy for review!
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87099 1-MAY 20:40 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Home manager (Re: Msg 87092)
|
||
|
From: MRUPGRADE To: DSRTFOX
|
||
|
|
||
|
I wish I could use theh Check portion,, now with expanded catagories,, and
|
||
|
tures,, it is much nicer. But theh "Business Pac" I use,, also
|
||
|
handles my business & MI&CC from one menu. Unfortunately there wouldn't be
|
||
|
near enough who would pay for a business handler on theh CoCo. So that part
|
||
|
will never be OS.
|
||
|
RE> I use BVDP OS-9 mial list....
|
||
|
Yup I considered it once myself. It is very good.
|
||
|
As I say,, Home-Pac OS, has <G> theh best I've seen.
|
||
|
RE> Do get me a copy for review.
|
||
|
There wouldn't be much point in my giving you a copy. Chris Dekker will
|
||
|
be handeling all marketing outside "The UPGRADE".
|
||
|
As foro me and OS-9,, well it does look like I'll hafta get my feet wet.
|
||
|
and since Chris Dekker does such a nice "install" job on his OS programs,
|
||
|
and I don't have to be a hacker to get it up and running (the way more
|
||
|
software should be),,, I probably will be using some.
|
||
|
Til then,,, Terry Simons
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87108 2-MAY 20:24 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Home manager (Re: Msg 87099)
|
||
|
From: DSRTFOX To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
The business pak may do BETTER on OS-9 than DECB. Depends on the software
|
||
|
mix. Remember, such a pak can be used in a multi-user environment under OS-9,
|
||
|
allowing several people access to the same data. You could have one terminal
|
||
|
churning out labels while someone else on another label is printing a selected
|
||
|
few
|
||
|
of the labels, another is doing a mail-merge, etc.... all accessing the SAME
|
||
|
label database!
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87119 2-MAY 23:11 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Home manager (Re: Msg 87108)
|
||
|
From: JEJONES To: DSRTFOX (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
> The business pak may do BETTER on OS-9 than DECB. Depends on the software
|
||
|
> mix. Remember, such a pak can be used in a multi-user environment under
|
||
|
> OS-9, allowing several people access to the same data.
|
||
|
|
||
|
That's very true, though it will take some additional work to make sure
|
||
|
multiple users don't get in one another's way.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Opinions herein are solely those of their respective authors.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Clipper Chip: Big Brother Inside
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87094 1-MAY 18:50 Applications (6809)
|
||
|
RE: ESC/P22 code (Re: Msg 87075)
|
||
|
From: JOHNREED To: CHYDE (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I never tried to compile a version of the DVI-ESC/P2
|
||
|
program on the COCO, but it might work. If I remember
|
||
|
right, all the printer control sequences are defined
|
||
|
as macros in a separate header file - so even if it
|
||
|
comes out boo big for the COCO, it might be handy
|
||
|
as a starting point for someone to write a COCO driver
|
||
|
for the ESC/P2 printers. As you pointed out, getting
|
||
|
a way to produce the DVI files on a COCO would be
|
||
|
quite a trick.
|
||
|
|
||
|
********************************
|
||
|
"Don't take life too serious - it ain't nohow permanent"
|
||
|
(Pogo)
|
||
|
|
||
|
John R. Wainwright <<CIS -- 72517,676>> <<DELPHI -- JOHNREED>>
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87096 1-MAY 19:56 Programmers Den
|
||
|
RE: programmers den (Re: Msg 87080)
|
||
|
From: JEVESTAL To: CEELEE (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
> Help, OS9cn(tom Birt, told me that someone had offered to release the
|
||
|
> source code for STG bbs (I think). I would like,along with others in the
|
||
|
> OS9 Users of
|
||
|
> San Diego, try porting it to os9000. also if anyone has been working on
|
||
|
> graphic
|
||
|
> progerxxx orxxx prog
|
||
|
> ramming with OS9000 please let us know. either Myself CeeLee or OS9CN
|
||
|
> Thanks.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some of the source code is available to StG sysops. But this is for future
|
||
|
CoCo development (to fix current bugs and enhance current modules), not for
|
||
|
cross platform developemnet. StG version 4 will be released for OS-9000 as
|
||
|
soon as the OS-9 (68k) version is done. It will also run on MS-DOS, Unix and
|
||
|
the CoCo according to Scott G.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Jim
|
||
|
|
||
|
======================== InfoXpress 01.01.00 OS-9/6809 ======================
|
||
|
| Narnia BBS: 24 hours serving CoCo OS-9 users
|
||
|
----|---- StG network: sysop@Narnia "Exclusively OS-9"
|
||
|
| Delphi: JEVestal@delphi.com
|
||
|
Marysville, CA InterNet: JEVestal@narnia.wa.com
|
||
|
| or : JEVestal@citrus.sac.ca.us
|
||
|
(916) 743-2617 Voice: (916) 743-4264:1 Corinthians 1:18 & Romans 1:16
|
||
|
=============================================================================
|
||
|
Jim Vestal: Assistant editor of The International OS-9 Underground,
|
||
|
"Magazine dedicated to OS-9/OSK Users Everywhere
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87097 1-MAY 20:21 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Boot Problem (Re: Msg 87069)
|
||
|
From: JPOTTAGE To: ILLUSIONIST
|
||
|
|
||
|
> DD doesnt have to be a floppy, it can be anything you wish, on my "big"
|
||
|
> coco, I have 2 MFM hard drives, and a SCSI drive.. /DD is the larger
|
||
|
> SCSI, and /H0 and /H1 are the 2 30 meg MFM's ...
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> -* Mike
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
Mike,
|
||
|
I am sorry if there was any confusion with my statement. What I
|
||
|
meant is that DD must be defined as a floppy drive with some modified
|
||
|
versions of cc3go(or init) in order to boot on a floppy system
|
||
|
with no hard drive. If DD is defined as a hard drive the boot
|
||
|
process will look for shell, grfdrv and startup from the hard drive.
|
||
|
This will cause a system without a hard drive to fail in the boot
|
||
|
process. I realize that DD can and probably should
|
||
|
be defined as the hard drive if you intend on booting to a system
|
||
|
where the hard drive is the primary drive.
|
||
|
Thanks for replying, I hope this is of use.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
o o
|
||
|
U
|
||
|
\_/
|
||
|
/ Jim Pottage \
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87143 3-MAY 21:07 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Boot Problem (Re: Msg 87052)
|
||
|
From: TEDJAEGER To: NEALSTEWARD (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Its been too long since I ran across this to give ya the correct answer
|
||
|
off the top of my head but I can run it down. The KenTon SCSI system
|
||
|
changes some modules in your boot file beyond just adding an h0
|
||
|
descriptor and a driver for that HD. You could compare module idents
|
||
|
on your original (pre-KenTon) bootdisk and the KenTon boot and find it.
|
||
|
Obviously its a module that handles IO but I cant remember which and
|
||
|
my CoCo is at my office. I'm thinking cc3go now is the culprit. You
|
||
|
need the pre-KenTon version of cc3go (?) back in the boot your building
|
||
|
for your son.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bests
|
||
|
---TedJaeger
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87103 2-MAY 00:38 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Supercomm... (Re: Msg 87085)
|
||
|
From: KSCALES To: 10BAUD (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
> Not a big point, but every time I see the remark about osterm not
|
||
|
> having ASCII upload, I like to point out that some kind soul created
|
||
|
> "slowio" which I'm sure must be in the telcom data base here.
|
||
|
<<<<<< edited for brevity >>>>>>
|
||
|
> I mention it because I think that without slowio, I'd be looking for a
|
||
|
> replacement for osterm which I love in every other respect.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yes, the ASCII upload in the Level 2 version of OSTerm does not work:
|
||
|
from looking at the source, it appears that Vaughn probably added it
|
||
|
to the menu while he was working on it, but released the package before
|
||
|
finishing the code (and forgot to remove it from the menu). The ASCII
|
||
|
upload isn't broken because of a problem with the code; it simply
|
||
|
doesn't work because it was never finished! This also applies to the
|
||
|
MM/1 release of TasCOM.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Northern Xposure has licenced the code for development of an enhanced
|
||
|
version of OSTerm (OSK only). The "prompted ASCII uploading" is fully
|
||
|
functional in the current development version of OSTerm 68K.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sorry, there are no plans for releasing an enhanced 6809 version, BTW.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Regards... / Ken
|
||
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
Ken Scales Delphi:KSCALES Internet:kscales@delphi.com CIS:74646,2237
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87104 2-MAY 01:33 General Information
|
||
|
Think about it...
|
||
|
From: MRUPGRADE To: ALL
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you were driving down a road at night,,,
|
||
|
at the "speed of light" and
|
||
|
reached down and turned on your head lights,
|
||
|
"Would they work"?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Til then,,, Terry Simons
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87121 2-MAY 23:34 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Think about it... (Re: Msg 87104)
|
||
|
From: ILLUSIONIST To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
:) Good question. Of course they would work. The driver just wouldnt see
|
||
|
the light ahead of him.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-* Mike
|
||
|
|
||
|
PS. the above is assuming that the cars headlights are in functioning order
|
||
|
in the first place. :)
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87124 3-MAY 00:30 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Think about it... (Re: Msg 87121)
|
||
|
From: MRUPGRADE To: ILLUSIONIST (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
You are of course, correct. but it does take a mo
|
||
|
moments thought. Unless of course th drive wee to look in the rear view
|
||
|
mirror. Then he could see where he's been. Like theh <g> curve he just
|
||
|
missed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
PS: It's a Ford,, of course the lights work.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Til then,,, Terry Simons
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87131 3-MAY 03:25 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Think about it... (Re: Msg 87104)
|
||
|
From: PAGAN To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
>If you were driving down a road at night,,, at the "speed of light" and
|
||
|
>reached down and turned on your head lights, "Would they work"?
|
||
|
|
||
|
One. There isn't enough energy available to accelerate a body with a non
|
||
|
zero rest mass to light speed. Not even if you were to convert the entire
|
||
|
mass of the universe to energy.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Two. No matter what your velocity is relative to another body, the speed of
|
||
|
light is a constant in both frames of reference. When you did switch on
|
||
|
your headlights, the beams would leave your car at the speed of light.
|
||
|
Abberation would cause your view of the road ahead to be 'interesting'.
|
||
|
But! the visible light photons reflected from "stationary" objects (which
|
||
|
are moving at near light speed in YOUR frame of reference) would strike you
|
||
|
with energies way up in the gamma range so you'd probably not live long
|
||
|
enough to enjoy the view.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Stephen (PAGAN)
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87136 3-MAY 18:57 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Think about it... (Re: Msg 87131)
|
||
|
From: MRUPGRADE To: PAGAN
|
||
|
|
||
|
RE There isn't enough energy... Not even in the entire universe.
|
||
|
I assue Steven you are speaking of 1900 technoligy. If you were to
|
||
|
be speakinh in 1800 technoligy,, and say there in
|
||
|
is no way known to store a few hundred thousand characters, in such an area
|
||
|
as we now do.... for theh present technoligy you'd be right.
|
||
|
But I'd be hesitant to say what is or isn't possible in th entire universe.
|
||
|
|
||
|
as for light photons,, reflecting and so forth... Why muddle a situation
|
||
|
by <g> bring in facts. That only leads otoo confusion.
|
||
|
Til then,,, Terry Simons
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87137 3-MAY 19:08 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Think about it... (Re: Msg 87104)
|
||
|
From: JOHNREED To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
> If you were driving down a road at night,,,
|
||
|
> at the "speed of light" and
|
||
|
> reached down and turned on your head lights,
|
||
|
> "Would they work"?
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> Til then,,, Terry Simons
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yep! And the beam would leave the car at the "speed of light"
|
||
|
..... relative to YOU of course.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"relative" is the key word -- that's what old Al was talking
|
||
|
about.
|
||
|
********************************
|
||
|
"Don't take life too serious - it ain't nohow permanent"
|
||
|
(Pogo)
|
||
|
|
||
|
John R. Wainwright <<CIS -- 72517,676>> <<DELPHI -- JOHNREED>>
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87148 3-MAY 23:24 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Think about it... (Re: Msg 87104)
|
||
|
From: WA2EGP To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yes, but they'd probably fry anybody standing in front of you (grin).
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87112 2-MAY 20:38 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: RiBBS (Re: Msg 87073)
|
||
|
From: DENNYWRIGHT To: STEWARD
|
||
|
|
||
|
xmode is as follows:
|
||
|
nam=T2 mgr=SCF ddr=SACIA hpn=07 hpa=FF68 upc=00 bso=01
|
||
|
dlo=00 eko=01 alf=01 nul=00 pau=00 pag=18 bsp=08 del=18
|
||
|
eor=0D eof=1B rpr=09 dup=19 psc=17 int=03 qut=05 bse=08
|
||
|
ovf=07 par=02 bau=04 xon=11 xof=13 col=50 row=18 xtp=85
|
||
|
wnd=85 val= sty= cpx= cpy= fgc= bgc= bdc=
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87117 2-MAY 22:36 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: RiBBS (Re: Msg 87112)
|
||
|
From: STEWARD To: DENNYWRIGHT (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tell your friend to try a XTP=4 and see if that helps any.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87113 2-MAY 21:40 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Loading SC to another window (Re: Msg 87054)
|
||
|
From: CHARLESAM To: COLORSYSTEMS
|
||
|
|
||
|
I tried that with no success. I've given up on loading SC at startup. It
|
||
|
would have been nice to have supercomm ready and waiting but it ain't
|
||
|
worth the hussle and crashes trying to do it. Thanx anyway! Charlie
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87120 2-MAY 23:20 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Loading SC to another window (Re: Msg 87049)
|
||
|
From: RANDYKWILSON To: CHARLESAM
|
||
|
|
||
|
Hmmm, I've never had a problem like that. In my startup, I have:
|
||
|
|
||
|
load sc23d8
|
||
|
supercomm #24K /t3 <>>>/w&
|
||
|
|
||
|
You would, of course, replace "sc23d8" with whatever your supercomm file
|
||
|
name is. Also, make sure you have device "W" in the bootlist, and use it.
|
||
|
in your example, you had a hard coded window (w1). If this window was
|
||
|
initialized first, weird things can happen.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Randy
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87123 3-MAY 00:19 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Loading SC to another window (Re: Msg 87120)
|
||
|
From: CHARLESAM To: RANDYKWILSON
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanx Randy, thats more info then I had till now. I never use /W.
|
||
|
I start with /W1 and load to /W5. Its in my bootlist though. I'll give this
|
||
|
a go and I'm sure(99&44% sure) it will do the trick. When it comes to SC,
|
||
|
no one helps out more then you.
|
||
|
I have a question that you might know something about. When you alter
|
||
|
your bootfile with native Pboost, do you change REL and OS9p1? If so,
|
||
|
then that explains why I can't boot from HD anymore. I have a 65meg,
|
||
|
RGB-DOS system with scsi interface like Neal discribed. I used the RGB
|
||
|
mods that came with the system to make a boot but it won't boot from
|
||
|
the HD anymore. My problem is the opposite of Neal's troubles. Mine
|
||
|
starts from HD, but it quickly switches to /d0 to load. I can live with it
|
||
|
but I'd like to know how come this happens. Thanx again for your help.
|
||
|
Charlie PS Will you be in Chicago for the Fest?
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87153 4-MAY 00:38 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Loading SC to another window (Re: Msg 87123)
|
||
|
From: RANDYKWILSON To: CHARLESAM (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Charlie,
|
||
|
|
||
|
yep, PBoost modifies OS9P1, REL, and Boot. Your problem is most likely the
|
||
|
boot module; you're back to one that looks at the floppy. I do not know if
|
||
|
the RGB boot module will work under native unmodified or not. The old try it
|
||
|
and see may be dangerous to the hard drive.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bug me about this in a few weeks (after the fest), when I have a bit more
|
||
|
time to ponder and tinker.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Randy
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87122 3-MAY 00:11 General Information
|
||
|
RE: OS9000 (Re: Msg 87029)
|
||
|
From: CPERRAULT To: DPHILIPSEN (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Have you contacted the regional representive for Microware? Btw,
|
||
|
I'm not sure if there is yet an assembler available for OS9000 or not.
|
||
|
Boisy or James may probably know for sure. I'm not sure about the
|
||
|
drivers but, I would imagine information on that would be available in
|
||
|
one of the professional OS9 books, like Starting OS9 or OS9 Insights,
|
||
|
but I haven't seen these books yet. Again, someone else would know
|
||
|
better than I, but that seems like a good place to look.
|
||
|
Btw, there is a series of articles in the OS9 Underground
|
||
|
regarding writing Device drivers.
|
||
|
>Chris<
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87125 3-MAY 02:03 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
Windows
|
||
|
From: CHARLESAM To: RANDYKWILSON
|
||
|
|
||
|
Randy, can /w be created? Or does it just have to be in memory? I tried to
|
||
|
open /w with no success. Yet the same commands work fine on other windows.
|
||
|
Here is what I tried;
|
||
|
iniz /w;wcreate /w -s=02 00 00 80 24 00 09 09;shell i=/w&
|
||
|
The above doesn't work, the window gets created but the shell doesn't fork.
|
||
|
If I sub /w1, it works fine. Forgive me, I'm dumb about these things.
|
||
|
In the meantime, I'll try running SC in /W1 from startup. Charlie
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87127 3-MAY 02:38 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Windows (Re: Msg 87125)
|
||
|
From: MITHELEN To: CHARLESAM
|
||
|
|
||
|
Why not just do a :
|
||
|
supercomm <>>>/w& in your startup file, I believe supercomm sets up its
|
||
|
own window parameters. /w is the "generic" window descriptor, and tells
|
||
|
the system to use the next available window.
|
||
|
--
|
||
|
Paul
|
||
|
P.S iniz'ing windows is an ugly thing to do...
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87145 3-MAY 22:12 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Windows (Re: Msg 87127)
|
||
|
From: CHARLESAM To: MITHELEN
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanx Paul, that explains alot. Instead of assigning specific windows, I
|
||
|
just assign W and let the file use the next avail. window. Do I have to iniz.
|
||
|
those windows or just W?
|
||
|
Charlie
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87146 3-MAY 22:31 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Windows (Re: Msg 87145)
|
||
|
From: MITHELEN To: CHARLESAM
|
||
|
|
||
|
You really don't need to iniz windows at all.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87152 4-MAY 00:34 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Windows (Re: Msg 87146)
|
||
|
From: CHARLESAM To: MITHELEN
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you say so Paul. I'm just following the manual (Rainbow). I suppose
|
||
|
I'll get it down sooner or later. The good news is I have my startup
|
||
|
configured to load SC, Dynastar, Presto Partner, along with term and one
|
||
|
text window. It even puts the PAGAN logo (altered a little) on the term
|
||
|
screen. Of course, with only 512k, I don't have much memory left. But
|
||
|
then I'm going to the Fest so I'll maybe fix that. I even have enuf
|
||
|
system memory to format a disk. I started late learning but I'm picking
|
||
|
up something new everyday. I might even be happy now for a week before
|
||
|
I try to alter things again. NO! A week is too long...maybe two days.
|
||
|
I didn't know what you meant by 'initializing all those windows'. Till
|
||
|
now I never had to deal with it. Willfo sent me his 'make#' utils for
|
||
|
creating windows several years ago when I started trying to get into
|
||
|
OS9. I couldn't use that for loading SC and Dynastar. So now I can
|
||
|
make my own with a little trail and error. Thanx for the tipoff, you
|
||
|
must have gotten a little chuckle from that (along with everyone else
|
||
|
here). Thats not my first goofup and it certainly won't be my last.
|
||
|
Someday I'll tell the story of how I ruined a Coco3 removing the
|
||
|
gime chip..... Later Charlie
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87154 4-MAY 00:47 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
RE: Windows (Re: Msg 87152)
|
||
|
From: RANDYKWILSON To: CHARLESAM (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Paul is absolutely correct. Do not iniz windows unless it's absolutely
|
||
|
needed, such as for wcreate (I don;t use wcreate for this reason). In the
|
||
|
old Level 1 days, it was a good idea to iniz all devices to be used, due to
|
||
|
memory frag reasons. With Level 2, this reason is gone, and the "W" descriptor
|
||
|
makes inizing unwanted. "W" is not a window device. It is a psuedo device that
|
||
|
tells the system to find the next unused (un-inized) window device, and use
|
||
|
that. If all the windows are pre-inized, it will bomb out.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the case of something like:
|
||
|
iniz /w
|
||
|
wcreate /w etc etc etc
|
||
|
shell i=/w&
|
||
|
|
||
|
The system will find an uninized window to use with the first line, which inizs
|
||
|
|
||
|
it. Then, for the second line, it will have to find another unused window. Can't
|
||
|
|
||
|
use the first one... it's now inized. Same thing for the third line. The system
|
||
|
seeks out a new window for the shell to use, which won't be either of the first
|
||
|
two.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Confused yet (I shouldn't answer realtime online after midnight :)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Randy
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87128 3-MAY 02:52 General Information
|
||
|
RE: classifieds (Re: Msg 87048)
|
||
|
From: DGANTZ To: ILLUSIONIST (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanx for letting me know. I'm getting tired of chaseing down bad leads
|
||
|
on equipment and software. Perhaps those that post classifieds could also
|
||
|
post a classified when equipment/software is sold. There must be a better
|
||
|
way than to let other users chase empty leads because something has been sold.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanx again,
|
||
|
Dave
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87130 3-MAY 03:03 General Information
|
||
|
RE: classifieds (Re: Msg 87053)
|
||
|
From: DGANTZ To: MRUPGRADE
|
||
|
|
||
|
I seem to run up against the barn doors swinging quite often. I check out
|
||
|
the most recent classifieds and work my way back to about three months back
|
||
|
if the classifieds are sparse. I agree with you. We need better maintainence
|
||
|
of the classfieds and the people placing them need to take greater
|
||
|
responsibility for them. They need to tell us when an item or items are
|
||
|
sold by the same means as they used to sell them, rather than leave us to
|
||
|
pay on a "dead horse". Anyway sounds like we're on the same sheet of music
|
||
|
as they say. Take care, and I appreciate your response.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Dave
|
||
|
DGANTZ on Delphi
|
||
|
DGANTZ@Delphi.com
|
||
|
(I don't check often anymore but
|
||
|
I can be reached through FidoNet
|
||
|
on the OS9 echo.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87129 3-MAY 02:59 Telecom (6809)
|
||
|
Printer baud rate
|
||
|
From: ISC To: ALL
|
||
|
|
||
|
My printer works well at 9600 baud from the bit banger port. Why won't it
|
||
|
work at 19,200? Port speed? I get an error 203 - illegal mode.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Dumb question?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bill
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87139 3-MAY 19:11 General Information
|
||
|
COCO Fest Airport Ride
|
||
|
From: DISTO To: ALL
|
||
|
|
||
|
I will be arriving at O'Hare at about 9:00 AM on Sat May 21. Anyone want to
|
||
|
share a ride to the COCO Fest at about that time? Is anyone going to the COCO
|
||
|
FEST? -Tony.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87142 3-MAY 20:25 General Information
|
||
|
RE: COCO Fest Airport Ride (Re: Msg 87139)
|
||
|
From: DOCBEAR To: DISTO (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Unfortunately, I won't be going to CocoFest in Chicago, but it is good
|
||
|
to hear from you. I do have on brief ?? for you however. Quite a while
|
||
|
ago I bought one of the early 1 Meg setups. It still works, and I have
|
||
|
put a lot of my patches on Delphi. I heard about a 2 meg setup you
|
||
|
built using SIMMs. Are any of these still around and will they work
|
||
|
with the original 1 Meg address board. I remember that the original
|
||
|
1 Meg could be piggy backed into 4 layers of 512K to give 2 M and the
|
||
|
additional line was even provided on the original address board.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanks, and good luck on your trip...
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87140 3-MAY 19:29 General Information
|
||
|
Disto 4n1 clock driver
|
||
|
From: NEATKID To: ALL
|
||
|
|
||
|
I wonder if somebody can help me out here...
|
||
|
|
||
|
About a year ago I bought a Disto SC-2 with the 4n1 board. The problem
|
||
|
is that the guy I bought it from neglected to send me the OS9 drivers for the
|
||
|
4n1 board. I did find a clock driver, but NitrOS9 won't patch it. This is
|
||
|
the clock driver that is IRQ hacked, and I beleive in the database here.
|
||
|
|
||
|
At any rate, does someone have the original Disto driver, or know of
|
||
|
a patch to the IRQ hacked drivers? My system is set up for slot 4, 60 hz,
|
||
|
for the 4-n-1 board.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanks,
|
||
|
Nick
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87141 3-MAY 20:19 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Disto 4n1 clock driver (Re: Msg 87140)
|
||
|
From: DOCBEAR To: NEATKID (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
I have the drivers to most of the Disto hardware. If you can get Tony
|
||
|
D. [DISTO] to grant me permission to send the drivers to you I will.
|
||
|
However, it is up to you to contact Tony and have him send me a message
|
||
|
allowing me to do so.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87150 3-MAY 23:54 General Information
|
||
|
RE: Disto 4n1 clock driver (Re: Msg 87140)
|
||
|
From: WDTV5 To: NEATKID (NR)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Howdy, I'm Gene Heskett, and I just uploaded the exact native mode clock
|
||
|
you need. At the moment its the 2nd or 3rd item down in "dat new". You
|
||
|
won't need to patch it as its already been "Nitros-9'd". It should also
|
||
|
work with the pboosted systems, but its time getter IS specific to the
|
||
|
SC-II+4n1 clock in slot 4. Slot patch instructs remain the same tho, so
|
||
|
you can use it in any slot or no slot (no mpi). Cheers, Nick
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
End of Thread.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
87158 4-MAY 04:24 General Information
|
||
|
keyboard
|
||
|
From: LARRYOLSON To: MROWEN01
|
||
|
|
||
|
Mike,
|
||
|
I got the keyboard tonight. I work nights but it was in the mail box
|
||
|
when I got home at 12:30.
|
||
|
I've got it all remapped for you, but it is now 4:07 am, so I want to
|
||
|
wait till tomorrow night and check it completely for any errors.
|
||
|
I also forgot to ask you what you wanted done with the CAPS key.
|
||
|
I can remap it to parallel any other key. I might suggest remapping it
|
||
|
to parallel the ALT key. As you know, the 4/p didn't have an ALT key, so
|
||
|
I mapped the F3 key as the ALT key. The only problem with using the F3 key
|
||
|
is that it is way over at the top right of the keyboard while the CAPS key
|
||
|
is closer to the middle.
|
||
|
Another option is that since line 8 on the connector is not being used
|
||
|
now, this line could be connected to the CAPS key, with the other side of
|
||
|
the CAPS switch going to ground. This could be used to control whatever
|
||
|
you would like.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Larry
|
||
|
|
||
|
-*-
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
FORUM>Reply, Add, Read, "?" or Exit>
|