666 lines
33 KiB
Plaintext
666 lines
33 KiB
Plaintext
|
The Delaware Valley Rail Passenger
|
||
|
|
||
|
November 1994
|
||
|
Vol. XII, No. 11
|
||
|
|
||
|
ISSN 1073-6859
|
||
|
|
||
|
Published by the Delaware Valley Association of Railroad Passengers in the
|
||
|
interest of continued, improved, and expanded rail service for the present and
|
||
|
potential railroad and rail transit passengers of southeastern Pennsylvania,
|
||
|
southern New Jersey, and nearby areas.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
For more information about DVARP and good rail service, please contact us:
|
||
|
P.O. Box 7505, Philadelphia, PA 19101 215-222-3373
|
||
|
|
||
|
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS
|
||
|
<dvarp@libertynet.org>
|
||
|
|
||
|
The electronic edition is produced as a public service to the network
|
||
|
community. It is archived on the CUNYVM Listserver in the RAILNEWS
|
||
|
directory. An index of back issues is available by sending INDEX RAILNEWS to
|
||
|
LISTSERV@CUNYVM. Thanks to Geert K. Marien (GKMQC@CUNYVM) for maintaining
|
||
|
this archive! If you have comments or questions, contact us, not Geert!
|
||
|
The DVRP is also archived on these FTP servers
|
||
|
ftp://wuarchive.wustl.edu/graphics/trains/text or graphics/trains/incoming
|
||
|
ftp://hipp.etsu.edu/pub/railroad/dvarp (Thanks to Bob Weir)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Coming soon: recent issues will be available on WWW
|
||
|
see home page opening soon--http:///libertynet.org/~dvarp/dvarp.html
|
||
|
|
||
|
Volumes X (1992) and XI (1993) are on floppy disk for $4.00 each from DVARP.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We hope you consider joining DVARP; your financial support makes possible
|
||
|
this newsletter and our many other activities on behalf of rail and transit
|
||
|
passengers. Annual dues are $16.00. see the coupon at ##V.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Contents copyright (C) 1994 DVARP, except photos (C) 1994 credited
|
||
|
photographers
|
||
|
|
||
|
President and Acting Editor: Chuck Bode
|
||
|
Production Manager: Donald Nigro
|
||
|
Online Liason: Matthew Mitchell
|
||
|
For other DVARP officers and committee chairs, find ##Q
|
||
|
|
||
|
Opinions expressed in The Delaware Valley Rail Passenger are not necessarily
|
||
|
those of DVARP or its members. We welcome your comments: call 215-222-3373
|
||
|
|
||
|
Schedule Change Alert
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is a traditional time to change schedules; passengers on all
|
||
|
railroad and intercity bus routes are urged to check for new schedules
|
||
|
before traveling. Amtrak, SEPTA RRD and Frontier issued all new schedules.
|
||
|
We have seen new schedules for almost all of Victory Division's routes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
contents:
|
||
|
use the search function of your word processor to find articles
|
||
|
##A Short-term Improvements for SEPTA's RRD
|
||
|
##B Short-Term Improvements: Is There Room for Discussion?
|
||
|
##C Miquon Station Parking
|
||
|
##D Customer Service Volunteer Initiative Begins
|
||
|
##E Schedule Change Details: SEPTA, Amtrak, NJT, and MARC
|
||
|
##F Volunteer Cleanups
|
||
|
##G Governors: Highways First
|
||
|
**Commuter Rail Committee insert not available in this edition
|
||
|
##I Internal DVARP News
|
||
|
Newsletter
|
||
|
DVARP Mission and Goals
|
||
|
DVARP Organization and Election
|
||
|
##J Tidbits:
|
||
|
##K DVARP Membership Coupon
|
||
|
##L DVARP Phone & Voice-mail Directory
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
##A Short-term Improvements for SEPTA's RRD
|
||
|
|
||
|
Professors Vukan Vuchic, PhD, and Shinya Kikuchi, PhD, have teamed
|
||
|
together, along with six research fellows, to
|
||
|
produce a second report detailing improvements to SEPTA's RRD. This report
|
||
|
concentrates on improvements that can be made
|
||
|
with no, or minor, capital funds. Many recommendations are presented to
|
||
|
reduce costs, speed service, increase convenience,
|
||
|
and increase ridership and revenue. The improvements are designed to
|
||
|
coordinate with the long-term improvements
|
||
|
recommended in the previous report so that no wasted funds or effort result
|
||
|
from implementing both sets of recommendations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The report gets right to the problem on page i: "...ridership is low
|
||
|
relative to the excellent coverage the network provides,
|
||
|
and it has a predominately declining trend. Moreover, financial results
|
||
|
are unsatisfactory: the Regional Rail Division's
|
||
|
operating ratio is considerably lower than the other SEPTA divisions'
|
||
|
ratios. There is a serious danger that the system will
|
||
|
continue along a "spiral" of increasing fares and/or service cuts -
|
||
|
decreasing ridership - reduced revenues - further fare increases
|
||
|
and/or service cuts." Chapter one identifies the major deficiencies from
|
||
|
the passengers' point of view: long headways, high
|
||
|
fares, inadequate information, virtually non-existent marketing,
|
||
|
inconvenient transfers, unsatisfactory scheduled speeds, and
|
||
|
unsatisfactory interior car cleanliness.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chapter Two covers improving the train scheduling. The routes are
|
||
|
recommended to continue operating from one side of
|
||
|
the system to the other through the tunnel (that is, separating the routes
|
||
|
into 13 radial routes is not recommended.) The
|
||
|
researchers examined four methods of scheduling the trains. Independent
|
||
|
schedules, SEPTA's current method, was found to
|
||
|
make transferring among lines difficult. Separate lines with regular
|
||
|
interval operation on the 30th Street-Jenkintown section
|
||
|
was found difficult because of the many constraints (single track, Amtrak,
|
||
|
etc.). Regular interval operation of the 30th
|
||
|
Street-Jenkintown section with other lines operating as independent feeders
|
||
|
(i.e. transferring from Fox Chase shuttles at Wayne
|
||
|
Junction, etc.) was found to have more disadvantages than
|
||
|
advantages.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The fourth method, network-wide timed transfer system,
|
||
|
was found to increase the usefulness of the system. The idea
|
||
|
is similar to that used at Norristown where all the buses meet
|
||
|
hourly to allow passengers to make every transfer. Because
|
||
|
there are not enough tracks and platforms for every line, a
|
||
|
pattern of half the lines meeting every other interval was found
|
||
|
most practical. This maximized the transfer possibilities onto
|
||
|
the lines most likely to be used (Airport and Trenton) and minimized the
|
||
|
least likely combinations (such as Trenton to West
|
||
|
Trenton). The end result is that rescheduling trains could reduce the time
|
||
|
passengers spend waiting for connecting trains by
|
||
|
27%.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chapter Two also examined schedules on individual lines, using Elwyn
|
||
|
as the example. The then current schedule (work
|
||
|
began in 1993) was found to suffer from irregular headways, excessively
|
||
|
long headways, increased sensitivity to delays, long
|
||
|
station standing times to board the accumulated passengers because of the
|
||
|
long headways, and failure to save costs from
|
||
|
short-turn trains by operating them the entire length of the line! Three
|
||
|
alternate schedules were studied: all local trains,
|
||
|
skip-stop service, and zonal service. The recommendation is a six-month
|
||
|
trial period of local trains every 20 minutes during
|
||
|
the peak travel periods (about three hours in the morning period studied).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chapter Three tackles quality of facilities. SEPTA's portion of 30th
|
||
|
Street Station is found to have serious problems. Signs,
|
||
|
on trains and at stations, are also found woefully inadequate. Five
|
||
|
recommendations are made:
|
||
|
1. Prohibit food consumption on the trains.
|
||
|
2. Reintroduce, intensify, and make permanent the campaign for car
|
||
|
cleanliness.
|
||
|
3a. Announce instructions about cleanliness and food prohibition.
|
||
|
3b. Crews collect trash in cars at terminals.
|
||
|
4. Include correction of deficiencies at 30th Street in contract for
|
||
|
completing the renovations.
|
||
|
5. Correct some deficiencies at 30th Street immediately.
|
||
|
The report makes a good point about 30th Street: "...it is where
|
||
|
the greatest number of new passengers use the Regional Rail
|
||
|
System for the first time. This is also the location where SEPTA
|
||
|
loses the greatest number of potential passengers by the lack of
|
||
|
user-friendliness...."
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chapter Four provides 27 recommendations for other aspects of RRD:
|
||
|
1. Reduce the present intra-suburban fares to $1.50 and widely publicize
|
||
|
it.
|
||
|
2. Use of ticket machines and cancelling machines to reduce need for the
|
||
|
crews to collect fares.
|
||
|
3. Introduce $0.40 transfers between RRD and other divisions.
|
||
|
4. Monthly passes for students with reduced fares on RRD.
|
||
|
5. Strong incentives for off-peak group travel on RRD.
|
||
|
6. A serious effort to increase ridership at inner stations including:
|
||
|
- reduce fares to level of transit fares.
|
||
|
- increase frequency of service and weekend service (flag stops).
|
||
|
- provide extensive information about transfer possibilities.
|
||
|
- promote and market these innovations.
|
||
|
- try for one year, then close stations still with low ridership.
|
||
|
7. Install stanchions for standing passengers.
|
||
|
8. Expedite construction of Civic Center and Eastwick Stations.
|
||
|
9. Increase efficiency of crew operations:
|
||
|
- rules that crews must open all doors they can handle.
|
||
|
- improve training to handle crowds and delays.
|
||
|
- place designation signs at doors and at head of trains.
|
||
|
(The report also examines the strange train designations, such as
|
||
|
calling a train Secane Express when
|
||
|
it does not
|
||
|
stop to Secane but does go to Elwyn.)
|
||
|
10. Reduce crew size and redeploy crews on more frequent service.
|
||
|
11. Improve conditions for intermodal transfers.
|
||
|
12a. Reduce time through Center City Stations.
|
||
|
12b. Improve control of departures from outer terminals.
|
||
|
13. Reduce cushion times on lines without frequent delays, take cushion
|
||
|
before lines converge.
|
||
|
14. Increase ability to handle emergencies and adverse conditions--make
|
||
|
trains superior to driving in bad weather.
|
||
|
15. Introduce a telephone number with information on current delays.
|
||
|
16. Clearly designate Market East Station and mark all entrances to it.
|
||
|
17. Implement suggestions from October 1989 User-Friendly Services
|
||
|
Symposium.
|
||
|
18. Clearly designate paths between RRD/Amtrak/MFSE/Subway Surface at 30th
|
||
|
St.
|
||
|
19. Correct public timetables to show possible RRD transfers & fares.
|
||
|
20. Develop a convenient slogan for the system.
|
||
|
21a. Provide more (instead of longer) trains for special events.
|
||
|
21b. Develop a simple fare collection method for special events.
|
||
|
22. Make the Wednesday evening fare a "Round trip for one-way fare".
|
||
|
23. Develop a system of complete and correct information about the Airport
|
||
|
line.
|
||
|
24. Clarify relationship between R1 and R2 and present clear information.
|
||
|
25. Cooperate with City to get more airport employees to use the train.
|
||
|
26. Develop a marketing plan for the Airport line with new ideas.
|
||
|
27. Improve the joint SEPTA-NJT service to New York:
|
||
|
- name the service.
|
||
|
- publish a joint schedule.
|
||
|
- easy purchase of through and round trip tickets.
|
||
|
- appoint a person to facilitate transfers at Trenton.
|
||
|
- consider through-routing the trains.
|
||
|
- increase service frequency to 30 minutes and speed trips by
|
||
|
servingintermediate stations every 60 minutes on a
|
||
|
skip-stop basis.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The ball is now in SEPTA's court (or should we say the train is now in
|
||
|
SEPTA's station?). How about an improvement
|
||
|
of the month plan? We look forward to implementation of many improvements
|
||
|
from this report. CB
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
##B Short-Term Improvements: Is There Room for Discussion?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Professors Vuchic and Kikuchi have done a thorough job of searching
|
||
|
for potential improvements to SEPTA's RRD. Some
|
||
|
of the improvements should not be improvements, people are already being
|
||
|
paid to do them--such as putting the correct signs
|
||
|
on the trains. Others are improvements DVARP has championed for years--
|
||
|
such as through Philadelphia-New York operation
|
||
|
with NJT. However, there are some proposals that may warrant further
|
||
|
passenger input before changes are made.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One example is the provision of stanchions for short distance
|
||
|
passengers to stand. This may work well travelling toward
|
||
|
Center City. Long distance passengers get on first, fill up the seats, and
|
||
|
then short distance passengers get on and stand. The
|
||
|
first inefficiency comes at the first Center City station where leaving
|
||
|
passengers have to squeeze through an aisle full of
|
||
|
standees. The delays of this method can be easily checked on Route 10.
|
||
|
Potentially more serious is the ride home. In Center
|
||
|
City everyone has an equal chance for a seat. Some seats will be used by
|
||
|
short distance passengers. Long distance passengers
|
||
|
who stand, will then get a seat for the remainder of their trip. Or will
|
||
|
they? Maybe they will stand once and decide the hassle
|
||
|
factor is too much. One claimed advantage of the train is that the time
|
||
|
can be productively used--but that assumes a seat.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To clarify the report, we had a discussion about stanchions with
|
||
|
Professor Vuchic. Not covered in the report are the trains
|
||
|
now carrying standees, for example during delays or bad weather.
|
||
|
Stanchions would help those passengers. The report is not
|
||
|
proposing less capacity thereby causing standees. The report proposes
|
||
|
increasing ridership, which could result in standees at
|
||
|
times. The stanchions would be a contingency plan for those standees.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A less clear factor is eating on board. Today many people are trying
|
||
|
to squeeze two jobs, a family, and other activities
|
||
|
into the day. The train takes longer than driving, so cannot be used
|
||
|
unless somehow the time can be used for "double duty"
|
||
|
in a manner not possible while driving. For some passengers the train is
|
||
|
the necessary meal period. No eating, no using
|
||
|
SEPTA. Smoking is officially prohibited at subway stations, not that one
|
||
|
would know through the smoke cloud on the 30th
|
||
|
Street Subway Surface platform. Is the problem education, litter, or
|
||
|
incorrigible slobs? Yes, the trains are often rolling garbage
|
||
|
dumps, but is this the best solution?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Much effort is devoted to optimize transfers among lines with
|
||
|
infrequent service. A major constraint seems to be
|
||
|
Amtrak--cited as a problem by every operator from Washington to Boston. Is
|
||
|
there an opportunity for more frequent service
|
||
|
by coordinating all the services from Washington to Boston, such as
|
||
|
scheduling commuter trains to depart just after Amtrak
|
||
|
trains. If all the commuter lines ran about every 15 minutes, then
|
||
|
scheduling transfers goes away as a problem, as does needing
|
||
|
to optimally schedule for some portion of the hour. While the commuter
|
||
|
trains in each city would depart at "odd" times,
|
||
|
increased frequency of service might result in overall benefits for
|
||
|
passengers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another consideration for transfers is eliminating them by pairing the
|
||
|
lines most likely to transfer. R6 meets itself, R7
|
||
|
crosses itself--no wonder no one rides through. Attempting to get the
|
||
|
straightest route might work--like the R2 and R3 lines.
|
||
|
Should there be a study to determine if capital funds to change track
|
||
|
connections would result in long term ridership gains?
|
||
|
For example, would Amtrak corridor, R8 Chestnut Hill, and R7 Trenton
|
||
|
passengers all benefit if the trains went south at North
|
||
|
Philadelphia to Market East Station instead of detouring through Zoo
|
||
|
Junction? Such a connection could permit the Paoli line,
|
||
|
with many schools, to continue to Trenton--potentially eliminating many
|
||
|
transfers on weekends.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ticket office hours are not addressed in the report. Even the rare
|
||
|
functioning ticket machine at outlying stations does not
|
||
|
provide passengers with warmth in winter, a feeling of safety at night, or
|
||
|
a restroom. In Center City, the long lines some
|
||
|
evenings and the number of potential passengers after closing ought to
|
||
|
justify at least a study of extending the hours at 30th
|
||
|
Street Station.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The report is quite instructive in many areas, presenting analysis so
|
||
|
the reader can understand how the recommendation was
|
||
|
reached and justified. Other areas, especially options not recommended,
|
||
|
are brushed aside. The report seems to indicate that
|
||
|
much analysis was done to reach the decision, but it is not presented,
|
||
|
denying a valuable learning opportunity--for example,
|
||
|
the data on feeders to a regular-interval trunk operation and how it was
|
||
|
determined not to be a good option.
|
||
|
|
||
|
As passengers, what recommendations do DVARP members have? What are
|
||
|
YOUR thoughts on the recommendations in
|
||
|
the study? What other low cost improvements could be made? Send your
|
||
|
thoughts to the post office box so the Commuter
|
||
|
Rail Committee can use them. Lets all work to make SEPTA the best system--
|
||
|
it would benefit all of us. CB
|
||
|
|
||
|
News Reports
|
||
|
|
||
|
##C Miquon Station Parking
|
||
|
|
||
|
We thank Robert B. Wolf for locating additional parking for Miquon station
|
||
|
passengers. He reports that on inquiring
|
||
|
into the shortage of parking, he was advised that the paper mill, which
|
||
|
operates across from Miquon Station, is happy to have
|
||
|
those using the trains to Philadelphia at Miquon park in their parking lot,
|
||
|
which has not been overcrowded for some time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
##D Customer Service Volunteer Initiative Begins
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sixty-five volunteers began evaluating SEPTA November 1. Marion J.
|
||
|
Colston, Chief Officer of Quality Assurance
|
||
|
Subway Elevated Division, began the formal process with an October 17
|
||
|
training program attended by about 45 of the
|
||
|
volunteers. The volunteers are to consider both the passenger's and
|
||
|
SEPTA's point of view. They are requested to report both
|
||
|
the good and the bad as they see it. The plan is to use the reports to
|
||
|
improve SEPTA so that it achieves its slogan of better
|
||
|
than driving. At the meeting SEPTA committed to achieving a 1995
|
||
|
subway/elevated Rider Report Card grade of B by making
|
||
|
improvements identified by the volunteers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Volunteers have four forms to use, two per day. The forms measure
|
||
|
accessibility, quality of service, vehicle
|
||
|
equipment, and safety. The forms cover physical equipment conditions
|
||
|
(equipment malfunctions), site conditions (cleanliness),
|
||
|
and human performance (were you greeted with a smile, announcement of
|
||
|
stops). At the training session, Mr. Gambaccini
|
||
|
extended the program from subway/elevated to the entire system. After
|
||
|
trying to use the subway forms on buses, the DVARP
|
||
|
volunteers quickly developed a more suitable form for surface transit
|
||
|
routes. We eagerly await word of the improvements to
|
||
|
be made as the reports are submitted. The program is planned to last one
|
||
|
year. Please inform DVARP if you notice any
|
||
|
changes (better or worse) from this program. CB
|
||
|
|
||
|
##E Schedule Change Details
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is a traditional time to change schedules; passengers on all
|
||
|
railroad and intercity bus routes are urged to check
|
||
|
for new schedules before traveling. Amtrak, SEPTA RRD and Frontier issued
|
||
|
all new schedules. We have seen new schedules
|
||
|
for almost all of Victory Division's routes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A quick look through the RRD schedules found the following changes:
|
||
|
SEPTA's Airport schedule shows the new
|
||
|
University City Station so that a change will not be necessary when the
|
||
|
station opens (expected "in December"). Times at all
|
||
|
the other stations remain unchanged. The Elwyn line also shows University
|
||
|
City station times without any other station times
|
||
|
affected. However, 40% of the trains no longer stop at Angora and almost
|
||
|
as many no longer stop at 49th Street. The
|
||
|
Wilmington schedule shows the University City Station. No additional time
|
||
|
appears to have been added for the new stop, but
|
||
|
some trains now operate at slightly different times.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Warminster trains times appear unchanged, except that service is
|
||
|
reduced at Wayne Junction, Crestmont and, Fulmor
|
||
|
Stations. One minute has been added to the running time of trains to West
|
||
|
Trenton; three minutes was added to one inbound
|
||
|
train. The Paoli format has been changed to make the type larger. A few
|
||
|
trains have minor time changes--sometimes a one
|
||
|
minute speedup--and stops have been slightly rearranged between trains.
|
||
|
The Doylestown schedule has also been printed with
|
||
|
larger type. The only train change appears to be elimination of the one
|
||
|
daily stop at Elkins Park, again without a change in
|
||
|
times at other stops. The only R change appears to be the first weekday
|
||
|
inbound train running ten minutes later. Shawmont
|
||
|
remains open. R7 has a few minor time changes (as do some connecting NJT
|
||
|
trains). Trains continue to stop at Wissinoming.
|
||
|
Passengers using R8 have the most changes. Almost all trains were changed
|
||
|
by one to ten minutes. Westmoreland was
|
||
|
abandoned. Good news is an added early morning train from Fox Chase at
|
||
|
5:55 arriving in Chestnut Hill at 7:00. This is the
|
||
|
second early morning train added to Chestnut Hill West this year.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bicycle permits appear easier to obtain. A new note in the RRD
|
||
|
schedules states that permits "are now available at
|
||
|
all Railroad Station Ticket Offices and 69th Street Terminal. Bicycles are
|
||
|
permitted on all Regional Rail Lines, the Broad
|
||
|
Street and Market-Frankford Lines and the Route 100. Please see agents for
|
||
|
details." We believe that there are still
|
||
|
regulations on the number of bicycles and the hours they may be brought
|
||
|
aboard are.
|
||
|
|
||
|
On Frontier Division several significant service enhancements began.
|
||
|
Route 93 Sunday service was extended from
|
||
|
Eagleville to Collegeville. However, passengers are urged to check
|
||
|
carefully because the column headings in the schedule
|
||
|
seem to be incorrect--the center columns look like Collegeville and the
|
||
|
other headings look like they should be moved over one
|
||
|
column toward the sides. The weekday Route 93 schedule now shows
|
||
|
connecting R6 trains. Sunday service was also added
|
||
|
for Routes 94 and 96 as far as Lansdale. Many weekday Route 97 trips were
|
||
|
extended to Plymouth Meeting Mall. Connecting
|
||
|
trains now show in the Route 130 schedule. 2XX series have minor changes
|
||
|
to match changed train times.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Suburban schedules now have the new look of other SEPTA transit schedules.
|
||
|
Route 100 shows the same 20 minute
|
||
|
headway for both Saturday and Sunday (most likely to allow for continuing
|
||
|
construction). Route 112 has a zone boundary
|
||
|
change: from Manoa Rd. to Eagle Rd. Route 112 also describes a new(?)
|
||
|
SEPTA policy: "If you wish to board in an area
|
||
|
not clearly identified as a transit stop, please stand in a position that
|
||
|
is safe and visible to the bus operator. Signal the operator
|
||
|
as the vehicle approaches. He/She will stop at or near the area as
|
||
|
dictated by safety." This policy does appear more cost-
|
||
|
effective that attempting to install and maintain a large number of bus
|
||
|
stop signs along some of the more outer suburban routes.
|
||
|
Route 114 also had a fare zone adjustment in Crum Lynne-from Ridley Ave. to
|
||
|
Fairview Rd. CB
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Amtrak has added a new early morning New York to Washington train which
|
||
|
departs Philadelphia at 7:00am. North
|
||
|
of New York City, there has been a significant expansion of New England
|
||
|
Express service. Reservations are required on all
|
||
|
New England Express trains north of Penn Station even when the trains
|
||
|
operate unreserved between Washington and New York.
|
||
|
Florida service was revised and the Capital Limited converted to
|
||
|
Superliners.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
In conjunction with the schedule changes, Amtrak revised fares. Round trip
|
||
|
fares were eliminated. Passengers may
|
||
|
still buy round trip tickets, but the fare in made from two one-way fares.
|
||
|
Peak periods were changed and now vary by city-pair.
|
||
|
For example, discount tickets are restricted for travel from Philadelphia
|
||
|
to New York on Fridays, but are not restricted from
|
||
|
Philadelphia to Washington. Where restrictions apply, they are generally
|
||
|
at holiday periods and Fridays from 1pm to 7pm.
|
||
|
New fares are expected to be higher for some passengers, but lower for
|
||
|
others.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
MARC has new Camden line express service, NJT increased Raritan Valley
|
||
|
service and began service to Hackettstown.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
The new host for SEPTA and Amtrak schedules on computer is LIBERTYNET.
|
||
|
Sponsored by the University City
|
||
|
Science Center and Bell Atlantic, LIBERTYNET is an experiment in community
|
||
|
networking. It is currently accessible at
|
||
|
Internet address LIBERTYNET.ORG. Existing links to the schedule
|
||
|
information on services like PENNINFO are still valid.
|
||
|
DVARP expects to be joining this project soon. (Thanks to MM for Corridor
|
||
|
analysis.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
##F Volunteer Cleanups
|
||
|
|
||
|
Lansdowne and Carpenter Stations recently benefitted from volunteer help.
|
||
|
The Mt. Airy Times/Express
|
||
|
photographed the Carpenter Station effort with DVARP member John Wireman
|
||
|
heading the lineup.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Member Action Section of Newsletter
|
||
|
|
||
|
##G Governors: Highways First
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bad news in the October 24 issue of Passenger Transport. The National
|
||
|
Governors' Association (NGA) is pushing
|
||
|
the US DOT to finalize the highway system (NHS) before considering a system
|
||
|
(NTS) that would include public transportation.
|
||
|
After the election, DVARP members are urged to write the Governors urging
|
||
|
them to support an expanded role for public
|
||
|
transportation in the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware region. CB
|
||
|
|
||
|
Views and Opinions Section of Newsletter
|
||
|
|
||
|
This month's views and opinions section is a special insert, pages CRC-1 to
|
||
|
CRC-4 provided by the Commuter Rail
|
||
|
Committee.
|
||
|
|
||
|
##I Internal DVARP News Section of Newsletter
|
||
|
|
||
|
Newsletter
|
||
|
|
||
|
Members may notice changes in our newsletter last month and this
|
||
|
month. We are trying to implement several improvements. First, we are
|
||
|
trying to clearly indicate the purpose of the articles. In the past, there
|
||
|
was often a lack of clarity between what was a review of events/news,
|
||
|
analysis of events/news, and individual member opinions and ideas presented
|
||
|
for discussion. This month we have attempted to clearly indicate the type
|
||
|
of material.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Second, we are trying to simplify production of the newsletter. We
|
||
|
have two goals to reach. Reducing the volunteer time required to produce
|
||
|
the newsletter enables those hours to be used more directly for expanding
|
||
|
and improving the public transportation system. The other
|
||
|
goal is to reduce the need for advanced skills, so that more members can
|
||
|
participate, thus reducing the burden on specific members.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Member suggestions are solicited. How can we make this newsletter
|
||
|
more useful and effective? What can we do to reduce preparation time?
|
||
|
What is important to YOU in the newsletter? Is the size, shape, or format
|
||
|
important? CB
|
||
|
|
||
|
DVARP Mission and Goals John Dawson
|
||
|
An updated DVARP mission and goals were approved at the October 15
|
||
|
meeting.
|
||
|
DVARP's mission is to promote public rail transportation in all its forms,
|
||
|
from local transit to intercity, to ensure that it is adequately funded, to
|
||
|
see that it is an integral part of our transportation system, to increase
|
||
|
public acceptance and ridership, and to work to improve its efficiency
|
||
|
and effectiveness. To accomplish our mission we need to work toward the
|
||
|
following goals:
|
||
|
1). To increase political support for public transportation. This means
|
||
|
communicating with our elected officials at federal, state, county, and
|
||
|
municipal levels, testifying at public hearings, writing letters to
|
||
|
newspapers, and generally stimulating public discussion of the issues.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2). To encourage use of public transportation. This is really a marketing
|
||
|
function. We should be trying to increase awareness of transit and to
|
||
|
encourage its use. E.g., we can point out that the Route 76 bus connects
|
||
|
Center City rail stations with the zoo and the art museum, and that
|
||
|
it can be ridden free on weekends with a family rail ticket; or we can
|
||
|
encourage the National Park Service to include transit information when
|
||
|
providing directions to its facilities.
|
||
|
3). To act as a consumer advocate. Our members are certainly familiar with
|
||
|
the various facets of the rail system, and know what works and what does
|
||
|
not. We can work to correct problems and redress grievances.
|
||
|
4). To help formulate long-range plans. The transportation planning
|
||
|
process today is much more open to public participation than it has ever
|
||
|
been before, thanks to ISTEA. We need DVARP and allied organizations to
|
||
|
see that rail alternatives receive proper consideration; otherwise we
|
||
|
are likely to get nothing but highways. we can participate at hearings and
|
||
|
other public forums, we can write letters to officials and to newspapers,
|
||
|
and we can promulgate ideas through our newspaper.
|
||
|
|
||
|
DVARP Organization and Election
|
||
|
The members at the October 15 meeting recommended that DVARP change to
|
||
|
a Board of Directors organizational format. They felt this would
|
||
|
facilitate future growth and increase effectiveness. Several years of
|
||
|
continual growth in membership and projects has both placed
|
||
|
increasing burdens on the small number of officers and limited the
|
||
|
opportunities for additional members to participate. Boards were felt to
|
||
|
be a more common and recognized structure among other large community and
|
||
|
environmental organizations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
An important benefit of a Board is efficiency at meetings. As
|
||
|
meetings become larger, the time required for each member to participate in
|
||
|
the discussion causes the meetings to become so long that persons are
|
||
|
unwilling to expend the time. Focusing discussions by topic at
|
||
|
smaller committees should shorten the meetings and allow more members to
|
||
|
participate throughout the organization. A side benefit is that committee
|
||
|
meetings would not be distracted by discussions from persons not interested
|
||
|
in the topic, but feeling compelled to offer their comments
|
||
|
at larger, multi-topic meetings. By attending the committee meetings of
|
||
|
specific interest, members would not lose time while other topics are
|
||
|
discusssed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The proposed Board would be filled by general membership election.
|
||
|
Members who would like to be on the Board are encouraged to send their
|
||
|
name, town/township, county, state, and a brief statement for publication
|
||
|
on the ballot. This information must be received before
|
||
|
the December newsletter is prepared for printing. The target date to begin
|
||
|
preparation is Thanksgiving. The next newsletter will contain a ballot
|
||
|
with which members can vote on changing to a Board or continuing with the
|
||
|
present officers structure and can vote on the directors to take
|
||
|
office if the structure change is approved.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The detailed proposal approved at the meeting is:
|
||
|
1) DVARP should replace the existing leadership structure with a nine(9)
|
||
|
member Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall be elected once
|
||
|
yearly through voting ballots cast by the General Membership. Each
|
||
|
Director
|
||
|
shall be elected by obtaining the largest majority of the popular vote from
|
||
|
the General Membership ballots received.
|
||
|
2) The Board of Directors shall elect the President and Vice President of
|
||
|
DVARP. The candidates must be Directors.
|
||
|
3) The following positions shall be appointed by the President of DVARP
|
||
|
contingent on approval by the Board of Directors.
|
||
|
A) Treasurer
|
||
|
B) Secretary
|
||
|
C) Public Relations Coordinator
|
||
|
D) Volunteer Coordinator
|
||
|
E) Editor
|
||
|
F) All Committee Chairs
|
||
|
4) The Board of Directors shall have exclusive franchise to vote for policy
|
||
|
and administrative decisions. All votes will be held at the scheduled
|
||
|
meeting of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall meet at
|
||
|
least
|
||
|
monthly. Such meetings shall be announced in advance and open to the
|
||
|
General Membership to attend.
|
||
|
5) Input from the General Membership should occur at the committee level,
|
||
|
thus shaping policy recommendations from the committee. Any General Member
|
||
|
should be allowed to participate at any committee meeting. Such
|
||
|
meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance.
|
||
|
6) Input from the General membership at the Board of Directors meeting
|
||
|
should be limited to a specific time allotment per each issue.
|
||
|
|
||
|
##J Tidbits:
|
||
|
Passenger Transport recently reported that 69 percent of SEPTA passengers
|
||
|
surveyed read while commuting. SEPTA has quickly developed a deal for
|
||
|
passengers. Flyers have appeared offering the Daily News for half-price to
|
||
|
TrailPass purchasers. There are no details, members
|
||
|
who buy the Daily News are encouraged to investigate.
|
||
|
|
||
|
SEPTA has also issued the annual slippery rail flyer. Passengers are
|
||
|
advised to allow extra time on damp mornings in November.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
##K DVARP Membership Coupon
|
||
|
Yes, I want to support improved passenger train and transit service in our
|
||
|
region. Here are my DVARP dues for 1995.
|
||
|
Name
|
||
|
|
||
|
Address
|
||
|
|
||
|
City, State, Zip
|
||
|
|
||
|
Phone (optional) H: W:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Please choose a membership category below, enclose check, and mail to:
|
||
|
DVARP, Box 7505, Philadelphia, Pa. 19101-7505
|
||
|
[] Supporting $25.00[] Family $20.00[] Regular $15.00 ($16 in 1995)
|
||
|
[] Sustaining $50.00[] Patron $75.00[] Benefactor $100.00
|
||
|
[] Under 21, over 65, student, retired, unemployed $7.50
|
||
|
|
||
|
Members using this coupon to renew, please enter membership number from top
|
||
|
left of label:
|
||
|
|
||
|
##L DVARP Phone & Voice-mail Directory
|
||
|
DVARP main number (voice mail line) 215-222-3373
|
||
|
9 Chuck Bode, President 215-222-3373
|
||
|
6 Robert H. Machler, VP-Administration 215-222-3373
|
||
|
5 Sharon Shneyer, VP-Public Relations 215-386-2644
|
||
|
3 Matthew Mitchell, Newsletter Editor 215-885-7448
|
||
|
<mmitchell@asrr.arsusda.gov>
|
||
|
4 Betsey Clark, Volunteer Coordinator 215-222-3373
|
||
|
8 Mark Sanders, Treasurer 215-222-3373
|
||
|
2 John Pawson, Commuter RR Comm. 215-659-7736
|
||
|
(6 to 9 pm please)
|
||
|
3 Transit Committee 215-222-3373
|
||
|
7 Don Nigro, South Jersey Committee 609-869-0020
|
||
|
Dan Radack, Bicycle Coordinator 215-232-6303
|
||
|
|
||
|
Computer e-mail (internet) dvarp@libertynet.org
|
||
|
|
||
|
|