72 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext
72 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext
|
October 1990
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RESEARCH REVIEW
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
POLICE USE OF DISCRETION:
|
|||
|
A COMPARISON OF COMMUNITY, SYSTEM,
|
|||
|
AND OFFICER EXPECTATIONS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Research Conducted By
|
|||
|
Hal Hugh Nees,II
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Research Reviewed By
|
|||
|
David J. Icove, Ph.D.
|
|||
|
FBI Academy
|
|||
|
Quantico, Virginia
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Police officers display significant levels of discretion in
|
|||
|
how they handle various law enforcement scenarios, according to
|
|||
|
a research study conducted in conjunction with a doctoral thesis
|
|||
|
in Public Administration at the University of Colorado. For
|
|||
|
purposes of the study, the available choices were limited to the
|
|||
|
following: Take no action, warn the offender, refer to a social
|
|||
|
agency, issue a summons, or arrest an individual. The study also
|
|||
|
examines the officer's age, sex, ethnicity, education, geographic
|
|||
|
residence, marital status, and political orientation.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The study entails the review of 20 incidents covering
|
|||
|
traffic violations, disturbances, drug and alcohol violations,
|
|||
|
prostitution, juvenile status crimes, vandalism, and gambling.
|
|||
|
All were misdemeanor offenses, with the exception of one
|
|||
|
involving the cultivation of marijuana. The sample groups of
|
|||
|
respondents included 1,077 police officers, probation officers,
|
|||
|
prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, judges, community
|
|||
|
leaders, and ordinary citizens in and around Colorado.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The comparison of police officers to all other groups shows
|
|||
|
that officers tend to treat individuals more harshly when
|
|||
|
dealing with curfew violations, drugs and alcohol, prostitution,
|
|||
|
and vandalism. The survey groups generally thought that the
|
|||
|
officers need to act more harshly when handling traffic violators
|
|||
|
and gambling offenses. The study also points out that even
|
|||
|
members within each group do not always agree with each other.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Officers handle intoxicated individuals differently,
|
|||
|
depending upon the suspect's attitude and demographics. It is
|
|||
|
more likely that cooperative individuals would be allowed to
|
|||
|
return home, while ``outsiders'' would be taken to jail.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Educational level and the experience of officers have an
|
|||
|
impact on their decisionmaking process. Generally, the higher
|
|||
|
the officer's education, the fewer sanctions the officer would
|
|||
|
impose on an individual. However, the study implies that during
|
|||
|
the early years of police service, officers tend to act more
|
|||
|
harshly, tapering off during their mid-level years, and then
|
|||
|
gradually escalating their choice of sanctions in the final years
|
|||
|
of their careers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The results of this study recommend that law enforcement
|
|||
|
agencies can take significant steps in the area of ``discretion
|
|||
|
management'' the ability of a jurisdiction to uniformly and
|
|||
|
fairly exercise levels of discretion by their officers. This
|
|||
|
research reinforces previous studies that show that boundaries of
|
|||
|
discretion are defined too generally by many law enforcement
|
|||
|
agencies. The study also questions whether law enforcement
|
|||
|
agencies reflect the priorities within their individual
|
|||
|
communities.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|