200 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
200 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
|
FEBRUARY 1990
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CRITICAL INCIDENT STRESS DEBRIEFING
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
By
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Capt. Richard J. Conroy, M.S.
|
|||
|
Assistant Chief of Police
|
|||
|
Saint Cloud, FL Police Department
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
* As the first responder to an early
|
|||
|
morning pedestrian accident, a police
|
|||
|
officer comes across a severed leg
|
|||
|
protruding from a shoe lying in the
|
|||
|
middle of the highway prior to locating
|
|||
|
the victim.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
* While stopping his car, a "back-up"
|
|||
|
officer responding to a domestic distur-
|
|||
|
bance call sees a fellow officer take a
|
|||
|
shotgun blast to the stomach just as the
|
|||
|
front door to the residence opens without
|
|||
|
warning.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
* An 18-month-old child is pulled from the
|
|||
|
family's backyard pool by the first responding
|
|||
|
police officer, only to have the child pro-
|
|||
|
nounced dead at the hospital emergency room.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
These accounts typify the wide-range of emotionally
|
|||
|
traumatic incidents that law enforcement officers may encounter.
|
|||
|
As first responders on the scene, they must act without delay,
|
|||
|
often without the support or backup of other emergency services
|
|||
|
personnel.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Research conducted by Dr. Jeffrey T. Mitchell (1) of the
|
|||
|
University of Maryland suggests that almost 90 percent of all
|
|||
|
emergency services personnel are affected at least once by
|
|||
|
critical incident stress during their careers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the past 2 decades, much emphasis has been placed on the
|
|||
|
effects of critical incident stress on the emergency services
|
|||
|
worker who is not a law enforcement officer. Unfortunately, the
|
|||
|
law enforcement community has been rather slow to accept the
|
|||
|
fact that critical incident stress can also be a potentially
|
|||
|
debilitating syndrome that seriously affects both the job
|
|||
|
performance and personal lives of police officers. (2)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CRITICAL INCIDENT STRESS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Critical incident stress can be brought on by any action
|
|||
|
that causes extraordinary emotion and overwhelms and impacts on
|
|||
|
an individual's normal ability to cope, either immediately
|
|||
|
following the incident or in the future. Police officers' human
|
|||
|
coping mechanisms are no different than those of others, just
|
|||
|
because they carry a badge and a gun. And the myth that police
|
|||
|
officers always have total emotional control in all situations is
|
|||
|
just that a myth, not a reality.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Any incident that results in deep emotional impact has the
|
|||
|
potential to overwhelm an officer's ability to cope. Oftentimes,
|
|||
|
it makes the officer come face to face with his or her
|
|||
|
vulnerability or sense of mortality, such as in an
|
|||
|
officer-involved shooting, the death or serious injury of a
|
|||
|
co-worker, prolonged or extraordinary rescue operations, or
|
|||
|
life-threatening, dangerous, or ``close'' calls.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For the most part, society expects law enforcement officers
|
|||
|
to handle whatever comes their way, to turn emotions on and off
|
|||
|
at will. But, is it reasonable to expect police officers to be
|
|||
|
all things to all people? And what happens if they can't live up
|
|||
|
to the expectations society places on them? Are there solutions
|
|||
|
to the problem?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
THE DEBRIEFING PROCESS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD) process has
|
|||
|
been developed in an effort to make law enforcement officers and
|
|||
|
emergency service workers understand that they are normal people,
|
|||
|
having normal reactions to abnormal events or situations. These
|
|||
|
debriefings are not the operational critiques that law
|
|||
|
enforcement administrators traditionally schedule after a major
|
|||
|
incident. Instead, they are gatherings led by a trained mental
|
|||
|
health professional with the assistance of supportive peer
|
|||
|
personnel.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The concept behind these debriefings is to encourage free
|
|||
|
expression of thoughts, fears, and concerns in a supportive
|
|||
|
group environment without losing status among one's peers. In
|
|||
|
fact, debriefings are much more successful and the feedback more
|
|||
|
positive when peer support personnel are more active. (3)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The debriefing process allows individuals to gain insight
|
|||
|
and reframe the event in a different perspective. As short-term
|
|||
|
initial intervention, it often aids in preventing some of the
|
|||
|
long-term cumulative effects caused by traumatic incidents.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Some departments require personnel to attend a debriefing
|
|||
|
session after being involved in a critical stress incident, while
|
|||
|
others make attendance a personal choice.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
All debriefings are confidential and provide an opportunity
|
|||
|
for educating officers on stress responses, as well as letting
|
|||
|
those involved know that they are not alone in their thoughts and
|
|||
|
feelings. Successful law enforcement debriefings have been
|
|||
|
conducted after the Winnetka, IL, school shooting, the Palm Bay,
|
|||
|
FL, shopping center shooting, and the Cerritos, CA, air disaster.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
DEBRIEFING TEAMS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Debriefing teams are support groups composed of volunteer
|
|||
|
trained mental health professionals and emergency workers who
|
|||
|
learn to talk with others about job-related stress. The team
|
|||
|
counsels others on dealing with the emotional toll of their
|
|||
|
professions.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Team members undergo 16 hours of training before they can
|
|||
|
conduct a counseling session, which is usually scheduled within
|
|||
|
48 hours after emergency workers have been involved in a critical
|
|||
|
incident. During the training, these volunteers are taught to
|
|||
|
identify critical incidents and the physical and emotional
|
|||
|
symptoms resulting from them, as well as delayed stress
|
|||
|
reactions.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Team members must also become familiar with a debriefing
|
|||
|
model. Basically, this model covers how to get people to
|
|||
|
identify what happened, their role in the incident, and what
|
|||
|
impact the incident had on them. If additional assistance is
|
|||
|
needed after the debriefing session, the individual is given a
|
|||
|
list of referrals to contact for one-on-one counseling.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Almost 100 CISD teams across the country operate on
|
|||
|
national, statewide, regional, and local levels. These teams
|
|||
|
have conducted in excess of 4,500 debriefings for law
|
|||
|
enforcement, as well as other emergency services workers since
|
|||
|
1983.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A number of larger police agencies have formed their own
|
|||
|
departmental teams and have trained peer debriefers, written
|
|||
|
operational procedures, and gathered administrative support for
|
|||
|
the CISD concept. Other police agencies have networked their
|
|||
|
members into county and regional teams where multidisciplinary
|
|||
|
resources from police, fire, emergency medical, hospital,
|
|||
|
chaplaincy, and mental health are pooled and shared as the need
|
|||
|
arises.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
LAW ENFORCEMENT CONCERNS
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The many administrative misconceptions about police
|
|||
|
involvement with mental health professionals are changing. The
|
|||
|
philosophies like ``we can handle anything'' and ``it all comes
|
|||
|
with the job, take it or leave it'' are becoming archaic.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Police managers who have witnessed officers suffering from a
|
|||
|
vast array of emotional, physical, and behavioral symptoms are
|
|||
|
beginning to recognize that these conditions can be the resulting
|
|||
|
effects of critical incident stress. Employee turnover, sick
|
|||
|
leave abuse, an increase in alcohol consumption, extreme
|
|||
|
aggressiveness, and substance abuse are just a few of the outward
|
|||
|
signs that an officer may need help from the department and
|
|||
|
peers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Training and education in the area of stress management have
|
|||
|
become somewhat common practices in the police profession.
|
|||
|
Within the past few years, any law enforcement conference,
|
|||
|
workshop, or seminar would not be complete without a segment or
|
|||
|
speaker on stress management, stress symptoms and their effects.
|
|||
|
But, there is still a long road to travel. Agency administrators
|
|||
|
need to realize that training programs will be more effective if
|
|||
|
they cover more than just the basics of stress education.
|
|||
|
Programs should encourage the dissemination of information
|
|||
|
specific to critical incident stress and the associated
|
|||
|
debriefing process.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CONCLUSION
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Providing critical incident stress debriefing services to
|
|||
|
law enforcement officers should be no different than giving
|
|||
|
officers the proper tools and equipment to perform their jobs
|
|||
|
correctly. Agency administrators owe it to their communities to
|
|||
|
assist in dealing with the effects of critical incident stress.
|
|||
|
The well-being of their departments, officers, and the citizens
|
|||
|
they serve depend on it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FOOTNOTES
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(1) Jeffrey T. Mitchell, Roles, Stressors and Supports for
|
|||
|
Emergency Workers, National Institute of Mental Health, U.S.
|
|||
|
Department of Health and Human Services, 1985.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(2) Thomas Pierson, ``Critical Incident Stress: A Serious Law
|
|||
|
Enforcement Problem,'' The Police Chief, vol. 66, No. 2, pp.
|
|||
|
32-33.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(3) Jeffrey T. Mitchell, Critical Incident Stress Debriefing
|
|||
|
Training Seminar, Orlando, FL, April 1989.
|
|||
|
|