179 lines
9.7 KiB
Plaintext
179 lines
9.7 KiB
Plaintext
|
August 1990
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A NEW APPROACH TO FTO TRAINING
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
By
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Blair Rankin
|
|||
|
Captain, High Point Police Department, North Carolina
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Prior to February 1989, the High Point, North Carolina,
|
|||
|
Police Department was using a traditional field training officer
|
|||
|
(FTO) program to supplement its academy training. This program
|
|||
|
had been in place since the 1970s; however, despite a highly
|
|||
|
structured format, new recruits graduating from the program
|
|||
|
reflected inconsistent work habits and attitudes. In addition,
|
|||
|
liability problems arose, as did concern for proper
|
|||
|
documentation, fairness, and doubts about the abilities of the
|
|||
|
FTOs themselves.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A close analysis determined that the central problem was a
|
|||
|
lack of consistency in the training methods used by field
|
|||
|
training officers. Recruits leaving the regimented environment
|
|||
|
of the academy were being assigned to several ``mini-FTO''
|
|||
|
programs throughout the Patrol Bureau, depending upon vacancies.
|
|||
|
Each of these units, though accountable to a central training
|
|||
|
authority, had its own definition as to proper FTO training
|
|||
|
methods.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
After considering many viable options, the department
|
|||
|
decided not to alter the FTO concept, but to continue its use
|
|||
|
with a new, highly centralized field training team. This team
|
|||
|
would consolidate all FTO training into one unified approach to
|
|||
|
improve its management. After its first year, the program's
|
|||
|
impact has been positive. Such a team method is apparently
|
|||
|
unique from most traditional FTO systems and may not be
|
|||
|
applicable to all departments.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Traditional Field Training
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Field training is a process by which officers receive formal
|
|||
|
instruction on the job. Although all officers receive a thorough
|
|||
|
introduction to law enforcement subjects during basic training,
|
|||
|
they cannot be expected to assume the full responsibilities of
|
|||
|
experienced police officers immediately following graduation from
|
|||
|
the academy. Therefore, additional training is given to officers
|
|||
|
in the field where they can learn from others who have already
|
|||
|
gained practical police experience.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In a typical FTO program, new recruits are assigned directly
|
|||
|
from the academy to ride with an FTO, usually a veteran officer
|
|||
|
who has volunteered for the position and who has received special
|
|||
|
training. During a specified 3- to 6-month period, several FTOs
|
|||
|
train and document the skills and abilities of each recruit. At
|
|||
|
the end of this time period, a formal review board decides
|
|||
|
whether to release the officer to work alone, return for more
|
|||
|
training or be terminated.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
High Point's Former FTO Program
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
All new recruits with the High Point Police Department must
|
|||
|
receive 694 hours of basic law enforcement training from
|
|||
|
in-house, State-certified instructors. The new officers were
|
|||
|
then assigned to a 12- week FTO program, during which time they
|
|||
|
had three different FTO instructors. Lateral entry officers also
|
|||
|
completed this process.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The department provided all FTOs with an FTO Recruit Officer
|
|||
|
Training Guide and required each FTO to submit a daily report and
|
|||
|
a weekly report. The FTO also interviewed the recruits weekly to
|
|||
|
keep them fully aware of their progress. A departmental training
|
|||
|
supervisor coordinated the staff and maintained all records of
|
|||
|
FTO training.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
During the 12 weeks, recruits were also assigned to other
|
|||
|
areas of the department, such as records, communications, and
|
|||
|
traffic to gain insight and hands-on experience. For the final 3
|
|||
|
weeks, they accompanied the FTOs on their duties, serving as a
|
|||
|
plainclothes observer. The process concluded with the recruit
|
|||
|
appearing before a formal review board.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Problems Encountered
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Even though all FTOs used the same guidelines, procedures
|
|||
|
and report forms, newly assigned officers showed alarming
|
|||
|
inconsistencies. From officer to officer, there were varying
|
|||
|
levels of 1) how well each could perform certain tasks and follow
|
|||
|
proper procedures; 2) how thoroughly each knew the various areas
|
|||
|
of the city; and 3) how thoroughly each had been taught by their
|
|||
|
FTOs. Some FTOs rated more fairly than others, and some let poor
|
|||
|
performance slide. Also, the police attorney voiced concerns
|
|||
|
that the department could be held liable for officers not
|
|||
|
receiving proper, standardized, on-the-job training after
|
|||
|
completing the basic academy course.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The root of these problems appeared to be the organizational
|
|||
|
structure of the FTO program. There was no quality control or
|
|||
|
command structure to assure uniformity. The inconsistency
|
|||
|
resulted from having field training conducted by several
|
|||
|
different teams. Although the departmental training supervisor
|
|||
|
was technically responsible for the program, team commanders
|
|||
|
established the guidelines for their respective teams. Selection
|
|||
|
and training of FTOs were not uniform, and standards varied from
|
|||
|
team to team. In addition, many of the high standards
|
|||
|
established during the basic training were soon lost as the
|
|||
|
recruit was told ``how it is on this team.''
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
High Point's New FTO Program
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In early 1989, a newly designed system consolidated all the
|
|||
|
field training teams into one. The FTOs were assigned to the
|
|||
|
team based upon their ability to train new officers. One
|
|||
|
commander and two supervisors were selected after special
|
|||
|
consideration for their experience, proven abilities and the
|
|||
|
examples they would set. In High Point, patrol teams that do not
|
|||
|
serve a field training function consist of 1 commander, 2
|
|||
|
supervisors, and 13 officers. However, the field training team
|
|||
|
consists of one commander, two supervisors, and nine FTOs. The
|
|||
|
four remaining slots for officers are filled in peak periods by
|
|||
|
off-duty volunteers from other teams.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
When there are no recruits to train, the FTO team performs
|
|||
|
regular patrol functions. The entire team also receives
|
|||
|
instruction in trainee evaluations and uniformity of departmental
|
|||
|
tasks, so that each trainee acquires the same information and
|
|||
|
instruction, creating a uniformly trained officer. After
|
|||
|
completion of the FTO program, the new officers are assigned to
|
|||
|
one of the four regular patrol teams. They then serve as
|
|||
|
functioning police officers, able to assume their duties and work
|
|||
|
alone.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Impact
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The new program has corrected the deficiencies that were
|
|||
|
evident in the previous FTO system. The FTO program is now
|
|||
|
tailored specifically to the department's requirements rather
|
|||
|
than to individual team practices. Centralized recruit training
|
|||
|
enables closer liaison between the FTO team and the training
|
|||
|
division. Now, uniform standards govern the FTO experience for
|
|||
|
all recruits. In essence, each has the same opportunity to
|
|||
|
succeed.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is expected that this new program will continue to
|
|||
|
provide well-trained officers performing in a uniform manner,
|
|||
|
thereby minimizing departmental liability. Individual and
|
|||
|
collective training deficiencies should also be more easily
|
|||
|
spotted and addressed. Recruits will also be assured of exposure
|
|||
|
to all areas of the city and will, therefore, be available for
|
|||
|
patrol in any location. Recruits themselves will have a more
|
|||
|
receptive learning environment because they will remain together
|
|||
|
for a longer period of time after the academy phase. Thus, the
|
|||
|
retention period for new recruits should also be lengthened.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The First 12 Months
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
During the first year of operation, 20 recruits completed
|
|||
|
the program 18 successfully finished, and two were dismissed.
|
|||
|
However, one negative aspect of the new FTO program became
|
|||
|
apparent, and that was the effect the program had on FTOs. After
|
|||
|
training recruits for two straight sessions, the FTOs are
|
|||
|
approaching burnout. And, finding officers to replace them has
|
|||
|
been difficult. For the most part, top veteran officers are
|
|||
|
reluctant to volunteer for the FTO position because they believe
|
|||
|
they will be repeatedly assigned to the FTO team. Therefore, to
|
|||
|
put a more positive spin on the FTO program, the department
|
|||
|
authorized special incentives. FTOs receive a 5-percent pay
|
|||
|
increase while training new recruits, special ``off'' days after
|
|||
|
each assignment, and a special FTO ribbon to be worn on their
|
|||
|
uniform in recognition for their efforts.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Conclusion
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The High Point field training team approach has been very
|
|||
|
successful, despite its minor problems, and has proven itself to
|
|||
|
be a favorable setting for the FTO process. It strengthens
|
|||
|
management and control of the program and further enhances what
|
|||
|
is a proven and important field training tool.
|
|||
|
|