1615 lines
52 KiB
Plaintext
1615 lines
52 KiB
Plaintext
|
From @mitvma.mit.edu:TWPIERCE@amherst.BITNET Fri Sep 13 01:09:12 1991
|
||
|
Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by marimba.cellbio.duke.edu (5.52/890607.SGI)
|
||
|
(for magidj) id AA04804; Fri, 13 Sep 91 01:09:12 EDT
|
||
|
Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.1MX) with BSMTP id 9228; Fri, 13 Sep 91 01:05:14 EDT
|
||
|
Received: from AMHERST (TWPIERCE) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with
|
||
|
BSMTP id 5073; Fri, 13 Sep 91 01:05:04 EDT
|
||
|
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1991 01:02 -0500
|
||
|
From: Tim Pierce <TWPIERCE%AMHERST.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
|
||
|
Subject: The Canonical List of Error Messages
|
||
|
To: magidj
|
||
|
Message-Id: <EE08762CC0402C92@AMHERST>
|
||
|
X-Envelope-To: magidj@marimba.cellbio.duke.edu
|
||
|
X-Vms-To: IN%"magidj@marimba.cellbio.duke.edu"
|
||
|
Status: R
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From Version 7 UNIX: "Values of B will give rise to dom."
|
||
|
|
||
|
(no, I don't know what it meant (or if it still exists!)
|
||
|
but it had something to do with removing a directory with
|
||
|
a name beginning with '.'.)
|
||
|
--
|
||
|
/
|
||
|
/ Jerry CalmaSD UNIX SysAdmin +1 619 587-3065
|
||
|
/
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Actually, my all-time favorite is:
|
||
|
|
||
|
FATAL system error #nnnn
|
||
|
CAUSE: We should never get here!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dondd@hpmwtd.HP.COM (Don Dillon)
|
||
|
|
||
|
my favorite happened while i was transfering a file from one
|
||
|
machine to another. after about five minutes the machine still
|
||
|
hasn't copied the file and responds with....
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
OHHHH.... I give up
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>Core dumped
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: sethb@fido.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <755@mgt3.sci.UUCP> dc@sci.UUCP (D. C. Sessions) writes:
|
||
|
>Actually, my all-time favorite is:
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>FATAL system error #nnnn
|
||
|
>CAUSE: We should never get here!
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
|
||
|
My favorite is the PL/1 compiler message
|
||
|
|
||
|
"COMPILER UNABLE TO ABORT"
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is the message when the compiler has attempted to abort the compilation
|
||
|
five times, and has failed each time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I don't know what happens next.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: nomann@rimfaxc.diku.dk (Ole Nomann Thomsen)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is what the Univac 2200's os1100 os produces, when I fill my
|
||
|
program file beyond its capacity:
|
||
|
|
||
|
I/O TYPE 01 CODE 22 CONT 12 REENT ADR: 015245 BDI: 403034
|
||
|
PACKET ADR 045301
|
||
|
AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO WRITE BEYOND THE MAXIMUM ASSIGNED SPACE
|
||
|
FOR A MASS STORAGE FILE. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO EXPAND A MASS
|
||
|
STORAGE FILE BEYOND THE MAXIMUM ASSIGNED SPACE. A READ
|
||
|
FUNCTION FOR A MASS STORAGE FILE SPECIFIED AN ADDRESS (WORD 5
|
||
|
OF THE I/O PACKET) THAT IS BEYOND THE MAXIMUM ASSIGNED SPACE.
|
||
|
A READ OR WRITE FUNCTION FOR A WORD-ADDRESSABLE MASS STORAGE
|
||
|
FILE SPECIFIED A MASS STORAGE ADDRESS (WORD 5 OF THE I/O
|
||
|
PACKET) AND A TOTAL DATA COUNT. WHEN THE MASS STORAGE ADDRESS
|
||
|
IS ADDED TO THE TOTAL DATA COUNT, THE RESULTING ENDING MASS
|
||
|
STORAGE ADDRESS IS GREATER THAN 2*/35-1. A READ OR WRITE
|
||
|
FUNCTION FOR A SECTOR-FORMATTED MASS STORAGE FILE SPECIFIED A
|
||
|
MASS STORAGE ADDRESS (WORD 5 OF THE I/O PACKET) THAT IS
|
||
|
GREATER THAN 2*/30-1. ADI ONLY: REFERENCE ATTEMPTED BEYOND THE
|
||
|
ASSIGNED FILE WHEN THE FILE IS CONFIGURED AS A FH-432 OR
|
||
|
FH-1782 DRUM.
|
||
|
(Filename: FEK*ONT)
|
||
|
END MAP. ERRORS: 1 TIME: 33.978 STORAGE: 054203/014304/035416/3/0220776
|
||
|
ERR$ TYPE 03 CODE 00 CONT 12 REENT ADR: 045147 BDI: 000015
|
||
|
USER EXECUTED ER ERR$.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The fun thing is that the err.msg.s are usually more like:
|
||
|
I/O TYPE 01 CODE 22 CONT 12 REENT ADR: 015245 BDI: 403034
|
||
|
|
||
|
and a register dump.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jaa@spyy00.UUCP (Jeff Anderson)
|
||
|
|
||
|
My favorite error message that I have *INCLUDED* in a program was:
|
||
|
ERROR: A really big FUCK UP has been detected !!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: insko@donner.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Robert (Bob) Insko)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Disk drive error codes:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Momentaraly writing while seeking
|
||
|
Constantly writing while seeking
|
||
|
Momentaraly writing while reading
|
||
|
....
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: ee5391aa@hydra.unm.edu (Duke McMillan n5gax)
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you run "strings" on the executable of gawk (the messdos version, at
|
||
|
least), you'll see a line with this message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
initstate: not enough state (%d bytes) with which to do jack; ignored.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I've no idea how to get gawk (GNU awk) to spit out this message, but it
|
||
|
appeals, somehow....
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: rickc@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Rick Clements)
|
||
|
|
||
|
We have a PC clone with a flakey keyboard. It often produces the error
|
||
|
message "Keyboard not present, press any key"
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
A friend of mine in a compiler writing class produced a compiler with one
|
||
|
error message "you lied to me when you told me this was a program"
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: riclark@pyrtech.pyramid.com (Richard Clark)
|
||
|
|
||
|
My favorite was "PROGRAMMER GOOFED . . . YOU SHOULD NEVER SEE THIS MESSAGE"
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: msjohnso@ensub.Wichita.NCR.COM (Mark Johnson)
|
||
|
|
||
|
When I was at Purdue, the IE department had a DG Nova system that would respond
|
||
|
to attempts to run object programs formatted for a DG Eclipse system with the
|
||
|
message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
YOU CAN'T DO THAT!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: hart@blackjack.dt.navy.mil (Michael Hart)
|
||
|
|
||
|
A library automation package I once worked on had the message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Man the Lifeboats! Women and children first! ....
|
||
|
|
||
|
Management was not amused when the first customer called in for
|
||
|
support with this message. :-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
No sense of humor, some of those mgt. types!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: philn@hprmokg.HP.COM (Phil Nielsen)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Okay, I know this isn't rec.games.trivia, but...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Can someone tell me the machine and editor which, when instructed to
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAKE WAR
|
||
|
|
||
|
would respond with
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAKE LOVE NOT WAR
|
||
|
|
||
|
(no, I don't know the answer; someone told me about this one once)
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: davidc@montagar.lonestar.org (David L. Cathey, SYSOP)
|
||
|
|
||
|
It's TECO, on VAX/VMS, and goes like this:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ make :== $ sys$system:teco32 make
|
||
|
$ make love
|
||
|
Not war?
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
|
||
|
Long live TECO!!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: chris@imagine.ADMS-RAD.Unisys.COM (Chris Sterritt)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here are some that I found in reading the string-pool from Knuth's TeX:
|
||
|
[Note that I included these from the actual file, so the one with 'can
|
||
|
fix can fix' below is what's actually there!]
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
(That makes 100 errors; please try again.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can now delete more, or insert, or whatever.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sorry, I don't know how to help in this situation.
|
||
|
Maybe you should try asking a human?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sorry, I already gave what help I could...
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
An error might have occurred before I noticed any problems.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
``If all else fails, read the instructions.''
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
This can't happen.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'm broken. Please show this to someone who can fix can fix
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
I can't go on meeting you like this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
One of your faux pas seems to have wounded me deeply...
|
||
|
in fact, I'm barely conscious. Please fix it and try again.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Interruption
|
||
|
You rang?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
IMPOSSIBLE.
|
||
|
|
||
|
NONEXISTENT.
|
||
|
|
||
|
ETC.
|
||
|
|
||
|
BAD.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
A funny symbol that I can't read has just been input.
|
||
|
Continue, and I'll forget that it ever happened.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
|
||
|
control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
|
||
|
My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
I dddon't go any higher than filll.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Dimensions can be in units of em, ex, in, pt, pc,
|
||
|
cm, mm, dd, cc, bp, or sp; but yours is a new one!
|
||
|
I'll assume that you meant to say pt, for printer's points.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: fax0112@uoft02.utoledo.edu
|
||
|
|
||
|
If things go amiss in Interactive Data Language, as they frequently do,
|
||
|
you get :
|
||
|
|
||
|
Something Rotten in Denmark, Interp Stack Not ALigned
|
||
|
|
||
|
just before the core dumps.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: sgs@grebyn.com (Stephen G. Smith)
|
||
|
|
||
|
My own favorite, from one of DEC's less successful versions of the RT11
|
||
|
linker:
|
||
|
|
||
|
<Assorted DEC ID fruitcake> ILLEGAL ERROR
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dye@owm2.Eng.Sun.COM (Kenneth Dye [Contractor])
|
||
|
|
||
|
My first 'C' class was under 4.1 BSD. I forgot to name my
|
||
|
first program with a ".c" suffix; hence the following error message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
% cc prog1
|
||
|
ld: bad magic number
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
which was a bit confusing to a person who didn't know
|
||
|
about magic numbers or what even 'ld' was....
|
||
|
|
||
|
Then there is my favourite, 'sail', who asks for a scenario
|
||
|
number from a list; if anything but a valid digit is input, 'sail'
|
||
|
simply says "very funny" and exits.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: rickc@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Rick Clements)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The most common error message we got from a modula II compiler that I used
|
||
|
at an other company was "Unexpected ';', expecting ';'"
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dmunroe@copper.WR.TEK.COM (David Munroe)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The early versions of TeX had this classic, which I believe the people at
|
||
|
Stanford even had printed on T-shirts:
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can't do that in horizontal mode.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: cy@dbase.A-T.COM (Cy Shuster)
|
||
|
|
||
|
My favorite was on the (gasp!) IBM 7094. Occasionally, the COBOL
|
||
|
compiler would die with just:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"COMPILER THWARTED".
|
||
|
|
||
|
This was in '74. I remember, because we had a tenth anniversary
|
||
|
party for the compiler (printed a date in '64 at the top of each
|
||
|
listing).
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jensting@skinfaxe.diku.dk (Jens Tingleff)
|
||
|
|
||
|
rickc@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Rick Clements) writes:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>We have a PC clone with a flakey keyboard. It often produces the error
|
||
|
>message "Keyboard not present, press any key"
|
||
|
|
||
|
In which case it's not really compaible. *The* message is
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Keyboard error or no keyboard present. Press F1 to continue."
|
||
|
|
||
|
Pull the keyboard lead out of an IBM (while power of), power on and
|
||
|
laaaaugh.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: BAE101@psuvm.psu.edu (Lemming)
|
||
|
|
||
|
A program called "junk" written by a student here at PSU gives the
|
||
|
following error message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Argument is bletchful."
|
||
|
|
||
|
On the Commodore Amiga, system crashes are always indicated by a black
|
||
|
window with a red flashing border at the top of the screen with the
|
||
|
words "Guru Meditation" and a number.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: sgs@grebyn.com (Stephen G. Smith)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is probably just another Urban Legend, but ...
|
||
|
|
||
|
A large company had just gotten their first Macintosh. As Macs do, it
|
||
|
had a system crash, and popped up a window with a picture (uhh, excuse
|
||
|
me, icon :-) of a bomb on it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Management ordered the building evacuated. And called the police ...
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: rca@fico2.UUCP (The OTHER Rick Adams)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Doing a strings on our version of lint yields this error message; I have
|
||
|
no idea how to get it to spit out... stack overflow, maybe?
|
||
|
|
||
|
"lint's little mind is blown."
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: BAXTER_A@wehi.dn.mu.oz
|
||
|
|
||
|
And a graph plotting program on the Amiga uses the red box with:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Hot Damn! You need more ram!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
When it runs out of memory.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: urlichs@smurf.sub.org (Matthias Urlichs)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Not to mention the MPW C compiler (not all of these may be funny to all of you):
|
||
|
|
||
|
String literal too long (I let you have 512 characters, that's 3 more than
|
||
|
ANSI said I should)
|
||
|
|
||
|
....And the lord said, 'lo, there shall only be case or default labels
|
||
|
inside a switch statement'
|
||
|
|
||
|
a typedef name was a complete surprise to me at this point in your program
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can't modify a constant, float upstream, win an argument with the IRS, or
|
||
|
satisfy this compiler
|
||
|
|
||
|
This struct already has a perfectly good definition
|
||
|
|
||
|
type in (cast) must be scalar; ANSI 3.3.4; page 39, lines 10-11 (I know you
|
||
|
don't care, I'm just trying to annoy you)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Can't cast a void type to type void (because the ANSI spec. says so, that's
|
||
|
why)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Huh ?
|
||
|
|
||
|
can't go mucking with a 'void *'
|
||
|
|
||
|
we already did this function
|
||
|
|
||
|
This label is the target of a goto from outside of the block containing this
|
||
|
label AND this block has an automatic variable with an initializer AND your
|
||
|
window wasn't wide enough to read this whole error message
|
||
|
|
||
|
Call me paranoid but finding '/*' inside this comment makes me suspicious
|
||
|
|
||
|
Symbol table full - fatal heap error; please go buy a RAM upgrade from your
|
||
|
local Apple dealer
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: emartin@digi.lonestar.org (Edgar Martinez Martinez)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I just got this error message while trying to spell-check a document:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"It seem you are trying to check the output from a word-processor. Not
|
||
|
only does this not make sense, but you would probably damage the file
|
||
|
if you tried so I am not going to let you do this!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well, what if I wanted to damage it!!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dfraser@ic.sunysb.edu (David W Fraser)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well just now while switching newsgroups i got this message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
It looks like the active file is messed up. Contact your news administrator
|
||
|
and leave the "bogus" groups alone, and they may come back to normal. Maybe.
|
||
|
^^^^^
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: felton@eng3.UUCP (Ed Felton)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This one is not exactly an error message story, but it's close, so here goes:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Our department is currently developing a Diagnostics package for IBM-PC boxes,
|
||
|
and as one of our intermediate INTERNAL releases, we added a new menu, with
|
||
|
help screen etc, for a set of functions we were about to add. It went through
|
||
|
the normal internal review cycle, with the Dept head spending some time looking
|
||
|
at it as well. Unknown to us, the dept head shipped a copy to a customer to
|
||
|
get their comments. The memo we got back from the customer was quite funny,
|
||
|
and I quote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
The SYSTEM UTILITY menu functions have not been implemented. Therefore
|
||
|
no comments for this. Help for this menu is somebody's idea of a joke!
|
||
|
I can only assume the help will be changed when the menu functions have
|
||
|
been completed
|
||
|
|
||
|
The dept head had never looked at any of the help menus, so he didn't know
|
||
|
what was going on. When he came back to us to find out what the problem was
|
||
|
this is what he found:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Attention K-Mart shoppers: Blue Light special in out SYSTEM UTILITIES
|
||
|
department. for the next 10 days we will be taking requests for the
|
||
|
utilities that you think should be here. Thank you again for shopping
|
||
|
K-Mart.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Needless to say, the dept head was P-Oed, but he ignored the
|
||
|
|
||
|
INTERNAL USE ONLY
|
||
|
disclaimer we had put with the software.
|
||
|
|
||
|
probably not funny, just wierd
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: crick@bnr-rsc.UUCP (Bill Crick)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Error messages I've seen:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Things are not looking good!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
"I didn't think this set of error conditions could ever happen"
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Now deleting all files. Goodbye" Then read a directory in order to make the
|
||
|
hard drive rattle!
|
||
|
|
||
|
When I was new to UNIX -> "file qwerty.asdfg has bad magic."
|
||
|
sounds like a real OS, no rinkydink stuff here?
|
||
|
|
||
|
And I knew some guys that were writing some SW to be used by local
|
||
|
clerical staff, and they got to a this should never happen, but we should
|
||
|
put in a message. Someone said the only person that could ever get into
|
||
|
this deep a mess is Linda, so they put a message that said
|
||
|
"Hi Linda! We wondered how long it would take, for you to mess up this bad."
|
||
|
Well sure enough, six months later,
|
||
|
Linda comes storming in mad as a wet hen, having discovered
|
||
|
that error message.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: andrew@earwax.pd.mwa.oz.au (Andrew Williams)
|
||
|
|
||
|
One amusing error message that I've seen is produced when you try to
|
||
|
restart the 'nnmaster' news program with the -k option. This should kill
|
||
|
the existing nnmaster so you can restart a new one- But if things go
|
||
|
wrong, you get the message "The running master will not die..."!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: bsmith@pluto.osf.org (Bruce Smith)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <3335@bnr-rsc.UUCP> crick@bnr-rsc.UUCP (Bill Crick) writes:
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>Error messages I've seen:
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>"Things are not looking good!"
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>"I didn't think this set of error conditions could ever happen"
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
|
||
|
This would have been a good one; unfortunately, it got caught before
|
||
|
the software went out (last place I worked):
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Shut 'er down, Clancy, she's a-pumpin' mud!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
The perpetrator, to my knowledge, was not found.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bruce Smith
|
||
|
|
||
|
x
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jpl5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Jay P. Lessler)
|
||
|
|
||
|
An error has occured on the error logging device.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: fax0112@uoft02.utoledo.edu
|
||
|
|
||
|
I ran a program once which had a menu of commands, including one
|
||
|
to get help. If you pressed the help key you got:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Out of order"
|
||
|
|
||
|
Very helpful!
|
||
|
In a simialr program, if you typed in an invalid command you got either
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Hey are you talking to me? Try again!"
|
||
|
or
|
||
|
"Invalid command. Feel ashamed for yourself and try again."
|
||
|
or
|
||
|
"Of all the commands available you picked the wrong one!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: zap@savage.UUCP (Zap Savage)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <13450@paperboy.OSF.ORG> bsmith@pluto.osf.org (Bruce Smith) writes:
|
||
|
>"Shut 'er down, Clancy, she's a-pumpin' mud!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
I've never seen this error occur, but I noticed while hacking graphics
|
||
|
routines into the Z80 portion of Radio Shack's (Microsoft's) TRS-80 Model 16
|
||
|
M68000 Xenix. (Note that for a while, this computer supported the largest
|
||
|
Unix (-like) base in the world).
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Z80 handled all the of the IO in the machine and somewhere imbedded in
|
||
|
the code was the message "Shut her down, Scotty, she's sucking mud again!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.ORG (Joe Morris)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Back in the dark ages (1967 or so) I rewrote a large part of the IBFTC
|
||
|
Fortran compiler for the IBM 7040 to add in most of the goodies which
|
||
|
were becoming available in compilers for other machines. (The primary
|
||
|
models I used were S/360 FORTRAN G and the Sigma 7 Fortran, but I
|
||
|
stole ideas wherever I could.) Keeping track of the data within the
|
||
|
compiler was a complex chore (at the time I was in grad school, and
|
||
|
I was the only staffer on the project...can you say "long hours"?)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I wrote in numerous checks on the internal procedures, but didn't have
|
||
|
much in the way of recovery code if inconsistent data were detected
|
||
|
except to abort with an error message. I swiped the error message from
|
||
|
a GE system; as I wrote it the text was:
|
||
|
|
||
|
ERROR 1164 HOW IN THE HELL DID YOU GET HERE
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: del@thrush.mlb.semi.harris.com (Don Lewis)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here are a few gems from our Harris VOS system.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We got used to seing this one a lot.
|
||
|
|
||
|
JOBCNTRL ER 512 : WARNING: FILE GENERATED.
|
||
|
>he 512
|
||
|
THE FILE WHICH WAS SPECIFIED AS THE 'COPY TO' OR DESTINATION FILE WAS
|
||
|
NOT THERE AND WAS THEREFORE GENERATED BY JOBCONTROL. IF YOU DID NOT
|
||
|
MEAN TO COPY TO A NEW FILE ELIMINATE THE FILE.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The next few are pretty amusing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
JOBCNTRL ER 76 : NO ACCESS FOR $TOAD SERVICE
|
||
|
>he 76
|
||
|
A USER PROGRAM MADE A CALL TO A $TOAD SERVICE AND THE USER DOES NOT HAVE
|
||
|
THE PROPER ACCESS TO BIT TO USE THAT SERVICE. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS
|
||
|
ARE PLACED ON THE $TOADS SERVICES IN GENERAL, AND $CPRIOR, $PABORT,
|
||
|
AND $SUSP FOR INDIVIDUAL RESTRICTIONS.
|
||
|
|
||
|
JOBCNTRL ER 2167 : NO ACCESS TO VULCANIZE PROGRAM
|
||
|
>he 2167
|
||
|
AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO VULCANIZE A REAL-TIME, MONITOR, OR NRH
|
||
|
TYPE PROGRAM, OR A PROGRAM WITH HIGH ACCESS, ACCOUNTING FILE ACCESS,
|
||
|
OR SUB-SYSTEM ACCESS. THE VULCANIZE REQUEST IS IGNORED BECAUSE THE
|
||
|
USER DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO GENERATE SUCH A PROGRAM.
|
||
|
|
||
|
JOBCNTRL ER 2211 : IT'S NOT NICE TO FOOL POP!
|
||
|
>he 2211
|
||
|
YOU JUST TRIED TO FAKE-OUT MOTHER NATURE, AND SHE CAUGHT YOU! SUPER-
|
||
|
VULCAN NOW HAS YOUR NAME ON HIS ENEMY LIST, AND YOU CAN BE CERTAIN THAT
|
||
|
FUTURE ATTEMPTS TO RESOURCE LFN 0,3,OR 6 WILL RESULT IN YOUR BEING
|
||
|
ABORTED, SPINDLED, MANGLED, FOLDED, PUNCHED, DELETED, AND DEALLOCATED.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This last message was often the cause of a sinking feeling late at
|
||
|
night.
|
||
|
|
||
|
JOBCNTRL ER 44 : PROGRAM FILE DESTROYED.
|
||
|
>he 44
|
||
|
THE PROGRAM HAS BEEN ABORTED DUE TO INCONSISTENCIES IN THE INFORMATION
|
||
|
GENERATED BY THE VULCANIZER. THE DISC COPY OF THE PROGRAM MAY HAVE BEEN
|
||
|
DESTROYED OR THE PROGRAM MAY NOT HAVE BEEN RE-VULCANIZED AFTER A MAJOR
|
||
|
SYSTEM RELEASE. IN ANY CASE RE-VULCANIZE THE PROGRAM (RLIBS ALSO).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fortunately I don't have use this machine anymore :-) :-) :-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: grayt@spock (Tom Gray)
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From the telephone switch world -
|
||
|
|
||
|
Outputs required from the ALARM SYSTEM
|
||
|
minor alarm
|
||
|
major alarm
|
||
|
critical alarm
|
||
|
|
||
|
alarm system failure alarm
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: pat@cscnj (Patrick Hester)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Trailblazer for the Atari ST has a good one.
|
||
|
You press the [Help] key and the machine laughs at you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: twpierce@amherst.bitnet (Tim Pierce)
|
||
|
|
||
|
A friend of mine screwed up somehow when he installed Windows 3.0 on his 386
|
||
|
running DOS 4.01, and now he can hardly run the damn thing without receiving
|
||
|
the following ominous-sounding declaration:
|
||
|
|
||
|
This application has violated system integrity and must be terminated.
|
||
|
|
||
|
No one at Microsoft seems to have heard of it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Also, I've been told that on VMS, if you attempt to send out e-mail with an
|
||
|
invalid header, it will respond with "You are a charlatan."
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: kgb8752@cs.rit.edu (Brayton Kevin Grant)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here's another one:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Occasionally our ultrix system will forget who you are and if you want
|
||
|
to "talk" to another user, the talk daemon will come back with
|
||
|
|
||
|
Go away. You don't exist.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
My OS (QNX) has a command called TSK (short for TASK) which allows you to
|
||
|
view information to do with tasks (code size, id's, son, dad, etc) when
|
||
|
I first saw it a friend of mine showed me the list of commands, of which
|
||
|
one is tsk tsk, I tried it, and it came up with the following message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tsk tsk? Have I been a bad computer?
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: ljp@sm.luth.se (Johan Persson)
|
||
|
|
||
|
When I tried to compile a program, (which had compiled nice
|
||
|
on a SUN workstation with both gcc and cc) on one of our old
|
||
|
VAX 11/750 I got the fantastic error
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. line 2706 compiler error: schain botch
|
||
|
|
||
|
(4.3 BSD and cc)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Does anyone have any clue to what that means ?
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: ph@ama-1.ama.caltech.edu (Paul Hardy)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In an earlier version of BSD (4.1?) if you did [I think it was a] "who" and
|
||
|
you were the only one on the system, it would print something like
|
||
|
|
||
|
Are you lonely?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Anyone have a better memory of this than I do?
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: cd5340@mars.njit.edu (David Charlap)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I remember my old TRS-80 Color Computer. It only had 2-letter
|
||
|
abbrevisations for all errors. The one for "file not open" when
|
||
|
you tried to read/write a file was:
|
||
|
|
||
|
?NO ERROR
|
||
|
|
||
|
It amused me when it happened.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dondd@hpmwtd.HP.COM (Don Dillon)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I got an error message on time while I was copying a file, and the
|
||
|
system seemed to be hung up. Just as I was going to attempt to abort
|
||
|
out the machine came back.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
oh........ I give up.... dumping core now!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
and the damn thing did !!!!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dag@gorgon.uucp (Daniel A. Glasser)
|
||
|
|
||
|
When I was working at Mark Williams Company, I had a midnight project to
|
||
|
take the Atari-ST version of make and put much of the shell functionality
|
||
|
(as far as command line parsing, wild card expansion, and a few built-in
|
||
|
functions) and 'cc' into the make executable, thereby improving the speed
|
||
|
of builds and such. I never did finish this, but I changed the standard
|
||
|
$ make love
|
||
|
Not war?
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
to
|
||
|
$ make love
|
||
|
For heavens sake, doesn't anyone just talk anymore?
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
and considered adding a random selection of other comments, like
|
||
|
Not tonight, I've got a headache.
|
||
|
I beg your pardon?
|
||
|
Your place or mine?
|
||
|
Maybe someone else has managed to hide something like this into a
|
||
|
commercial package.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dag@gorgon.uucp (Daniel A. Glasser)
|
||
|
|
||
|
When I was in college the entire school was using a single PDP-11/40
|
||
|
under RSTS/E. We had somewhere around 20 DECwriter II's (LA36's) for
|
||
|
use by the students in various places around the campus. One evening
|
||
|
I encountered a terrified beginning FORTRAN student who had encountered
|
||
|
a bug in the FortranIV compiler we were running at the time. Something like:
|
||
|
|
||
|
FORTRAN FATAL INTERNAL ERROR
|
||
|
FATAL COMPILER DAMAGE REPORT FOLLOWS
|
||
|
|
||
|
followed by a page and a half of register and stack dump info. This
|
||
|
student was convinced that he'd broken the compiler, and that he'd be
|
||
|
in big trouble for breaking the compiler for everyone else.
|
||
|
|
||
|
At another point that year, (April 1) someone (I won't say who) edited the
|
||
|
system error message file.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
?Invalid Character At Terminal -- Please Go Away
|
||
|
?Unibus timeout -- send in a new quarterback
|
||
|
?Ouch, That HURTS!
|
||
|
|
||
|
And other gems. The computer center manager was not thrilled.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: pat@megatest.UUCP (Patrick Powers)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I worked on a UNIX system that had an editor called e. Once entered
|
||
|
it took control of the screen and required some highly unlikely sequence
|
||
|
of key strokes to exit. It was fairly easy to type e by accident so
|
||
|
to avoid this annoying fate some fellow aliased e to the message
|
||
|
You must be joking.
|
||
|
One day an e user decided to use his terminal and got a surprise.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: kurt@tc.fluke.COM (Kurt Guntheroth)
|
||
|
|
||
|
> "Error: Error ocurred when attempting to print error message."
|
||
|
|
||
|
I once blew away my VMS shell process by redefining the standard error file
|
||
|
SYS$ERROR (I think, it's been awhile). You execute the command and things
|
||
|
are fine, then you run your pascal program which dies with an error printed
|
||
|
to PAS$ERROR. PAS$ERROR is assigned to SYS$ERROR, which is assigned to
|
||
|
something invalid. The OS wants to tell you that the error channel is
|
||
|
invalid, and what does it try to do? Print on SYS$ERROR. At this point, I
|
||
|
got a hexadecimal register dump(!!) and blown off the system. And this was
|
||
|
on a "commercial" OS. How graceful.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: farren@sat.com (Michael J. Farren)
|
||
|
|
||
|
cd5340@mars.njit.edu writes:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>"Error #1: Power supply not found"
|
||
|
|
||
|
Or my favorite real error message, found in the User's Manual for the Atari
|
||
|
800 computer, which produced only numbers for errors, so you had to look up
|
||
|
the translation in the manual:
|
||
|
|
||
|
ERROR 0: POWER NOT ON
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: fmayhar@hermes.ladc.bull.com (Frank Mayhar)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Shortly after I started work at the Stephen F. Austin State University computer
|
||
|
center as a support person, we had a coed come in with a very strange problem.
|
||
|
She had been trying to do her FORTRAN homework, and had run across a bug in the
|
||
|
FORTRAN compiler (ANSF on Honeywell CP-V). On her printout was some diagnostic
|
||
|
information, followed by the words:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Break Rob's knuckles.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I've always wondered who Rob was, and what he did wrong.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: raf@karl.cs.su.OZ.AU (A Stainless Steel Rat)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <1991Feb22.224448.18015@servalan.uucp> rmtodd@servalan.uucp (Richard
|
||
|
Todd) writes:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>I think it was a remark in the BUGS section of the manpage for tunefs(8),
|
||
|
>something along the lines of "You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tuna
|
||
|
>fish"... Alas, all I can check right now is the Apple Unix man pages, which
|
||
|
>seem to have had the fishy witticisms excised. :-(.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The unix system we used at this university a few years back had two strange man
|
||
|
entries that went something like:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ man fish
|
||
|
|
||
|
would give you:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Don't say "fish", Bishop. It doesn't mean anything.
|
||
|
|
||
|
and
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ man overboard
|
||
|
|
||
|
would give you:
|
||
|
|
||
|
# # ####### # ###### ###
|
||
|
# # # # # # ###
|
||
|
# # # # # # ###
|
||
|
####### ##### # ###### #
|
||
|
# # # # #
|
||
|
# # # # # ###
|
||
|
# # ####### ####### # ###
|
||
|
|
||
|
BUGS: No life raft
|
||
|
|
||
|
raf
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: roberts@edsews.eds.com (Ted Roberts)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <91049.154321DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu>, DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu (David Barr)
|
||
|
writes:
|
||
|
> My personal favorite: "Oops! Error while handling error!"
|
||
|
> (a concurrent C compiler)
|
||
|
|
||
|
My favorites were from the older Apollo OS's, two of the systems errors
|
||
|
were (I believe I remember them correctly):
|
||
|
|
||
|
Can't find wicked faraway objects.
|
||
|
and
|
||
|
Can't fit 27" tape through 25" door.
|
||
|
|
||
|
These were actually given in response to a request for meaning from
|
||
|
the stcode.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: smb@data.com (Steven M. Boker)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <27c11888@ralf> Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU writes:
|
||
|
>}On the venerable Model I Trash-80, the DOS had a vector reserved for what the
|
||
|
>}manual listed as "Unprintable Error". The exact meaning was never defined.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The MSDOS 1.0 manuals had a listing for "Invalid Error".
|
||
|
Talk about getting it wrong.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: hagan@ecs.umass.edu
|
||
|
|
||
|
error messages. get this one (today, friday, MARCH FIRST, 1991) our mainframe
|
||
|
decided not to allow logins.
|
||
|
|
||
|
why was that?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Nobody was validated for access on february 29th, 1991 (btw, what day of the
|
||
|
week was that?!)
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <525@bria> uunet!bria!mike writes:
|
||
|
>[ in regards to the expression "if (a = b)" instead of "if (a == b)" ]
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>Think *lint*. IMHO, there is nothing we need less than a compiler spitting
|
||
|
>out more useless verbage.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The only problem with that is that many PC based C compilers don't include
|
||
|
a lint program. It makes sense that the programmer at least have the option
|
||
|
of enabling various warning messages. Strangely enough, I once comitted
|
||
|
the exact opposite mistake. I had a C statement like this:
|
||
|
|
||
|
i == j;
|
||
|
|
||
|
The compiler (bless its little heart) gave me the warning:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"code has no effect"
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: twpierce@amherst.bitnet (Tim Pierce)
|
||
|
|
||
|
(Sorry if this is a well-known one. I'm new to Unix.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Just to rehash an old thread... Today, I accidentally sent an empty mail
|
||
|
message, and Ultrix said, "No message, no subject; hope that's ok."
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: umpfaif0@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Mike Pfaiffer)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here is another first time post to the net. Hope it meets with your
|
||
|
approval...
|
||
|
|
||
|
I was learning PL/1 a couple years ago and for our first or second
|
||
|
assignment we had to split one file into two files based on the first char
|
||
|
on the line. The program compiled correctly and I even got output of sorts.
|
||
|
The result was the following line...
|
||
|
|
||
|
I the most critical examiner of all have determined that there is an error on
|
||
|
line 42.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: david@kessner.denver.co.us (David Kessner)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Computers running a DTK BIOS report a parity error as:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Parity Error But Segment Doesn't Found
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: wex@cs.ULowell.EDU (Paul Wexelblat)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Then there was level D of TOPS (before DEC gave releases numbers, and
|
||
|
TOPS was the PDP-10 OP Sys; there was no TOPS-10 (or even Texex yet)).
|
||
|
|
||
|
MORE CORE AVAILABLE, BUT NOT FOR YOU
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jjb@sequent.com (Jeff Berkowitz)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I love these. In the SunOS 3.0 source code, somewhere in the VM
|
||
|
system I think, there was a line that said:
|
||
|
|
||
|
panic ("Shannon and Bill say this can't happen");
|
||
|
|
||
|
I saw this one for myself, in 1986, working for a now-defunct company
|
||
|
that was a Sun source licensee at the time. (Saw it in the source,
|
||
|
that is - never saw it happen :-).
|
||
|
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
|
||
|
A DEC oldtimer told me that a DEC-10 once printed
|
||
|
|
||
|
PUNT
|
||
|
|
||
|
after a particularly misguided attempt to get it to boot, is this
|
||
|
one apocryphal?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Does anyone collect these things?
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: kenw@skyler.arc.ab.ca (Ken Wallewein)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I've heard -- or read, I think -- about some code that contained the comment
|
||
|
"you aren't expected to understand this". Seems to me it was in TCP/IP.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jbertoia@medar.com (Jeffrey A. Bertoia)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <KENW.91Jul15225254@skyler.arc.ab.ca> kenw@skyler.arc.ab.ca (Ken Wall
|
||
|
ewein) writes:
|
||
|
>I've heard -- or read, I think -- about some code that contained the comment
|
||
|
>"you aren't expected to understand this". Seems to me it was in TCP/IP.
|
||
|
>/kenw
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Whitesmiths 'C' manual had a line like that in the bugs section
|
||
|
of the manual page after a particulary harrowing description of,
|
||
|
as I remember, an internal function.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: ardai@bass.bu.edu (Michael Ardai)
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From article <KENW.91Jul15225254@skyler.arc.ab.ca>, by kenw@skyler.arc.ab.ca (Ke
|
||
|
n Wallewein):
|
||
|
> I've heard -- or read, I think -- about some code that contained the comment
|
||
|
> "you aren't expected to understand this". Seems to me it was in TCP/IP.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Deep inside the Teradyne hardware modeler code is a routine that feeds a
|
||
|
whole bunch of hex numbers into a SYS$QIO call. The only comment is
|
||
|
'Weird magic happens here'.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: whatis@wookumz.gnu.ai.mit.edu (....What Is?....)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I don't collect these things, but I have one to add, and I'm hoping
|
||
|
someone has an Earthly explanation for it. This happened on a
|
||
|
VAX 11/750 running 4.3 BSD. We've all seen the "You have new mail."
|
||
|
message after the csh prompt, but ONCE it actually said instead
|
||
|
"Thou hast new mail." It's only happened once! And I swear it
|
||
|
happened! Has anyone else ever seen this? I don't even know what
|
||
|
triggered it!
|
||
|
|
||
|
--
|
||
|
Steve Boswell | This opinion is distributed in the hopes that it
|
||
|
whatis@ucsd.edu | will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY...
|
||
|
whatis@gnu.ai.mit.edu |
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: gnat@kauri.vuw.ac.nz (Nathan Torkington)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Aaah, but then I want to know about *these* strings, found
|
||
|
(here) in /usr/local/bin/mail:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Too much "sourcing" going on.
|
||
|
Okie dokie
|
||
|
Mail's idea of conditions is screwed up
|
||
|
~h: no can do!?
|
||
|
Too many regrets
|
||
|
detract asked to insert commas
|
||
|
metoo
|
||
|
Somethings amiss -- no @ or % in arpafix
|
||
|
Made up bad net name
|
||
|
ubluit
|
||
|
Who are you!?
|
||
|
; why =
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: fisher@qut.edu.au
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Algol compiler for the ICL 1900 used very occasionally collapse with
|
||
|
the message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"The impossible has happened!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bill
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: kfitzpa@hubcap.clemson.edu (Kevin Fitzpatrick)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In <1663@cvbnetPrime.COM> mkaminsk@cvbnet.prime.com (mailhost) writes:
|
||
|
>Anyway it was a Tandy 6000 (their successor to the Tandy 16)
|
||
|
>running XENIX (a beta version I believe). The memory has gotten
|
||
|
>a little foggy over the years, but I recall the wording as:
|
||
|
|
||
|
> panic: Z80 panic: shut her down Scotty, she's sucking mud again.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tandy was big on the hidden Trek messages. On of their TRS-80 6.x
|
||
|
upgrades had an ASCII quote buried way out on an unused track.
|
||
|
Something like...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Beam me up Scotty, there's no life out here.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: kline@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charley Kline)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Gavin.Flower@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Gavin Flower) writes:
|
||
|
>Well anyway... I often used the Algol compiler on a B6700 mainframe
|
||
|
>and sometimes got the message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
> "NO ERRORS DETECTED".
|
||
|
|
||
|
>I rather thoght this was a more honest message than other conpilers
|
||
|
>gave! I felt it was not so subtle hint that one should not be
|
||
|
>complacent!
|
||
|
|
||
|
The VS/PASCAL compiler under VM/CMS (there, that's two V's already and I
|
||
|
haven't even gotten to the real point yet) goes one step further in compiler
|
||
|
honesty. If your program compiles successfully, it will issue
|
||
|
|
||
|
NO COMPILER DETECTED ERRORS.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I swear I can see the italicization on the words "COMPILER DETECTED."
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: carroll@cs.uiuc.edu (Alan M. Carroll)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Epoch has a few funny messages in it for disasterous circumstances.
|
||
|
Some of them are:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Holy Panes Batman, the window's missing!" - when a X window structure
|
||
|
isn't there.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Holy PH, Batman, the buffer's missing!" - a window without a buffer.
|
||
|
This one has actually been seen outside the lab.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Holy Vectors Batman, I can't get more lines!" - malloc failed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The error message I want to put in, but never have had the chance, is
|
||
|
"System Error - Sureness out of Bounds". You PLATO heads know what I
|
||
|
mean.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: stanger@otago.ac.nz (Nigel Stanger)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Expressionist (a Mac application for doing equations) has the
|
||
|
following error messages in it:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Mysterious Error -nnn
|
||
|
|
||
|
Internal Error: Illegal hedge TV number. (huh?? what?!)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Internal Error: BlinkThere or HiliteThere messed up.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bad External File System: Boy, is your system messed up. :)
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dm@think.com (Dave Mankins)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Honeywell's customer service department once got a very concerned
|
||
|
message from a confused customer whose MULTICS system had printed:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Hodie natus est radici frater
|
||
|
|
||
|
before giving up the (holy?) ghost. ``Today unto the root is born a
|
||
|
brother''.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is a hack on ``Hodie natus est filius nobis'', or ``Today unto us
|
||
|
is born a son''. I don't know the reference exactly, but it's in
|
||
|
Handel's Messiah.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It seems a Multics hacker (allegedly Bernie Greenberg) at MIT had
|
||
|
inserted the liturgical allusion when it detected the ``impossible
|
||
|
event'' of the filesystem deciding it had two roots.
|
||
|
|
||
|
[Greenberg is also known for having taken notes in Latin (``for
|
||
|
clarity and precision'') when in the fever dream induced by first
|
||
|
exposure to a Rubik's Cube.]
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: BUBOO@livid.uib.no
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the IRC-server there are some "nice" messages, and here's a coupple of them:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Looks like mere mortals are trying to enter the Twilight Zone
|
||
|
FATAL: Major security hack. Notify Administrator.
|
||
|
Identity problems, eh ?
|
||
|
Bad Craziness
|
||
|
'tis is no game for mere mortals
|
||
|
Go away and get a life
|
||
|
Death before dishonour ?
|
||
|
Dave, don't do that...
|
||
|
Good afternoon, gentelman, I'm a HAL 9000 Computer
|
||
|
Only few mortals may try to enter the Twiligth Zone
|
||
|
Only real wizzards know the spells to open the gate of paradize
|
||
|
Trying to unlock the door twice eh ?
|
||
|
Use the force, Luke !
|
||
|
Change balls, please
|
||
|
|
||
|
My favorite is definitivly the "Bad Craziness" ... :-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
/Ruben
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: BJGLEAS@auvm.american.edu (bj gleason)
|
||
|
|
||
|
On an old Perkin-Elmer Machine, the Pascal Compiler would say:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"NONE of your errors have been found"
|
||
|
|
||
|
The compiler was smart enough to know that your program had errors anyway :-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: greywolf@unisoft.UUCP (The Grey Wolf)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Now, granted, this is something one of us here did, but our VAX precedes
|
||
|
its panics with the message
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Well, you ran into something and the game is over."
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jhawk@panix.com (John Hawkinson)
|
||
|
|
||
|
My favorite RSTS/E error message is "Unused error message #xxx". Somehow
|
||
|
I managed to get these when hitting ^C as a certain program loads.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: kenw@skyler.arc.ab.ca (Ken Wallewein)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Take this for what it's worth, but at a shop where I once worked, an
|
||
|
overnight processing run would sometime fail with the error message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
"FALL DOWN GO BOOM"
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: tbray@watsol.waterloo.edu (Tim Bray)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well, this is just a story, picked up from the early days of Usenet, so it's
|
||
|
possibly unfounded and furthermore some folks have likely already seen it,
|
||
|
but it gave me days of snickers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Story goes that that some little text-edit subsystem of something or other
|
||
|
which had very few things that could go wrong had only one error message,
|
||
|
used for both user and internal errors:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Data potato doo-wop doo-wop
|
||
|
|
||
|
When pressed for an explanation, the programmer said: "well, I figured
|
||
|
it hd to print *something* when there was an error."
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala)
|
||
|
|
||
|
> When you type your mail and type ~C (typo for ~c) my unix mail tells me:
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> Okie dokie, core dumped.
|
||
|
|
||
|
bash$ cat > x.c
|
||
|
main() { execl ("/bin/mail", 0); }
|
||
|
^D
|
||
|
bash$ gcc x.c
|
||
|
bash$ ./a.out
|
||
|
puke
|
||
|
bash$
|
||
|
|
||
|
//Jyrki
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: mkaminsk@cvbnet.prime.com (Mark B. Kaminsky)
|
||
|
|
||
|
On the old NCR Towers I used to get the following message on the
|
||
|
console whenever someone on a terminal would hold down the left
|
||
|
(or right - I forget which) arrow key:
|
||
|
|
||
|
spurious multibus interrupt
|
||
|
|
||
|
It took us a long time to figure out what was causing the messages
|
||
|
since nothing else bad happened and the people on the terminals
|
||
|
would be looking at their own screens while typing. Anyone on the
|
||
|
console, on the other hand, would look at the process table for
|
||
|
suspicious processes, etc.
|
||
|
|
||
|
NCR took the bug report with a great deal of disbelief, but their next
|
||
|
release of UNIX didn't have the problem.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: bhoughto@hopi.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I predict that Eighth Generation computers
|
||
|
will compile no programs, run no applications,
|
||
|
and access no data. Instead they will be
|
||
|
designed and tuned to give a continuously
|
||
|
variable spectrum of elegant and precise
|
||
|
error messages describing your failure to
|
||
|
induce them to do so.
|
||
|
|
||
|
--Blair
|
||
|
"And I'm not even married..."
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: gamble@hawk.rice.edu (Ben Gamble)
|
||
|
|
||
|
As long as we're running strings on everything from here to
|
||
|
Berkeley...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Someone in a now-junked message pointed out something from lint. I
|
||
|
don't remember what it was, but here's one I did find in lint, SunOS
|
||
|
4.1.1 (I think):
|
||
|
|
||
|
EDOTDOT!!!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Your guess is probably much better than mine.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: aem@aber.ac.uk (Alec David Muffett)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <NICKEL.91Jul19181940@desaster.cs.tu-berlin.de> nickel@cs.tu-berlin.d
|
||
|
e writes:
|
||
|
>In article <OTTO.91Jul19112520@kalikka.jyu.fi> otto@kalikka.jyu.fi (Otto J. Mak
|
||
|
ela) writes:
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>- on SunOS 4.1 and did, in fact, see the string "Thou hast new mail."
|
||
|
|
||
|
You think THATS funny (it is), but strings "/usr/lib/sendmail" for a few laughs:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From the silly:-
|
||
|
|
||
|
You wascal wabbit! Wandering wizards won't win!
|
||
|
savemail: HELP!!!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
to the plausible but still silly:-
|
||
|
|
||
|
Who are you ?
|
||
|
Can't parse myself!
|
||
|
|
||
|
to the plain ridiculous:-
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAIL DELETED BECAUSE OF LACK OF DISK SPACE
|
||
|
|
||
|
- not to mention all the SMTP "HELO" dialogue...
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: dw3w+@andrew.cmu.edu (Database Work)
|
||
|
|
||
|
What about this one (present in SunOS 4.1.1 and who knows where else)
|
||
|
when attempting to use the csh builtin 'suspend' from a login shell:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Can't suspend a login shell (yet).
|
||
|
|
||
|
What's that supposed to mean??? Not until later in the afternoon? Not
|
||
|
until they rewrite the shell? Not until you get rid of stopped jobs?
|
||
|
|
||
|
:-) I got quite a chuckle out of that one.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tod McQuillin
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jn11+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joseph M. Newcomer)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The SAIL compiler had a number of puns on sailing, one of which was the
|
||
|
compiler internal error message which referred to "dryrot" (if you don't
|
||
|
know anything about boats and sailing, be aware that "dryrot" is the
|
||
|
bane of a boatowner's existence, and once it sets in your boat is
|
||
|
doomed...). The modula "dryrot" message seems to indicate that at least
|
||
|
one implementor had used SAIL.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jn11+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joseph M. Newcomer)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The classic short message was from JOSS, one of the early interactive
|
||
|
languages (from the mid-1960's; it ran on a machine at RAND Corporation
|
||
|
called the JOHNNIAC). It was on a small machine. It had one catchall
|
||
|
message:
|
||
|
|
||
|
EH?
|
||
|
|
||
|
this was based on the premise that the error would be so blindingly
|
||
|
obvious to the programmer that no further indication of the nature of
|
||
|
the error was required.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Wrong.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(I worked in another interactive system that thought this was such a
|
||
|
cute idea that they used it. This was a mistake. If you knew the
|
||
|
language, the cause of the error may have been obvious, but if you
|
||
|
didn't know the language you were in deep trouble. They extended this
|
||
|
philosophy to the printed documentation!)
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jdavis@noao.edu (Jim Davis)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well, I've seen the "You are a charlatan" in a mail context before,
|
||
|
though only on a DEC-20. Lessee, any DEC-20s left... :-(
|
||
|
|
||
|
Oh yeah, sri-nic ..err.. nic.ddn.mil.
|
||
|
|
||
|
bordeaux$ telnet nic.ddn.mil 25
|
||
|
Trying 192.67.67.20 ...
|
||
|
Connected to nic.ddn.mil.
|
||
|
Escape character is '^]'.
|
||
|
220-NIC.DDN.MIL SMTP Service 6.1 at Fri, 26 Jul 91 18:21:06 PDT
|
||
|
220 Don't Worry.
|
||
|
helo nonesuch.noao.edu
|
||
|
250 NIC.DDN.MIL - Never heard of that name, bordeaux.kpno.noao.edu
|
||
|
helo cc.utah.edu
|
||
|
250 NIC.DDN.MIL - You are a charlatan, bordeaux.kpno.noao.edu
|
||
|
quit
|
||
|
221 NIC.DDN.MIL -- Be Happy!
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: fisher@qut.edu.au
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <ocY7bU200Vs3IeFxYy@andrew.cmu.edu>, jn11+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joseph M.
|
||
|
Newcomer) writes:
|
||
|
> The classic short message was from JOSS, one of the early interactive
|
||
|
> languages (from the mid-1960's; it ran on a machine at RAND Corporation
|
||
|
> called the JOHNNIAC). It was on a small machine. It had one catchall
|
||
|
> message:
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> EH?
|
||
|
|
||
|
We used a language called JEAN on ICL's 1900 series. We knew this was a
|
||
|
dialect of JOSS but it must have been closer than we knew as it used the
|
||
|
same error message.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The JEAN error message I liked was "Your expression has defeated me" which
|
||
|
was generated by a program such as
|
||
|
1.1 X=X
|
||
|
1.2 PRINT X
|
||
|
|
||
|
I never understood this until I was explaining to someone the meaning of
|
||
|
recursion in Algol. To demonstrate that simpler languages could not
|
||
|
handle recursion I gave JEAN a recursive definition of a factorial and
|
||
|
to my surprise it gave the right answer!
|
||
|
|
||
|
To understand this you also need to know that in JEAN
|
||
|
SET X=3 gave the variable X a value.
|
||
|
LET X=3 defined X as a function.
|
||
|
and the default verb was LET, not SET.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Hence "Your formula has defeated me" meant that it had run out of store
|
||
|
because of infinite recursion.
|
||
|
|
||
|
What a pity Basic defeated the much more elegant JOSS.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bill
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jot@fig12.cray.com (Otto Tennant)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Twenty or so years ago, the Fortran IV compiler for the SDS Sigma 2
|
||
|
would occasionally comment at the bottom of your listing:
|
||
|
|
||
|
WARNING: 54 - PROGRAM NOT RECURSIVE
|
||
|
|
||
|
(That *looks* right. I'm pretty sure about the number and the text.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I was somewhat startled by the message, since I knew Fortran programs
|
||
|
were not recursive.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Eventually, in a fit of boredom and despair, I wrote a recursive
|
||
|
program which produced the error message. Worked fine, too. So far
|
||
|
as I know, it may still be running. Wasn't RE-ENTRANT tho.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: gpwrmdh@gp.co.nz
|
||
|
|
||
|
In article <1991Jul29.080544.10301@kcbbs.gen.nz>, Roger_Hicks@kcbbs.gen.nz (Roge
|
||
|
r Hicks) writes:
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> Another fascinating message of the DEC10 at that time was the MAKE
|
||
|
> command, used to load the editor with a new text file.
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> Typing MAKE LOVE, gave the message NOT WAR, before starting the editor.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This carried over into other operating systems, including RT-11. Another
|
||
|
one I remember is HELP ME, which came back with:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Help is not available for you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
--
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
Martin D. Hunt
|
||
|
GP Print Limited USEnet address : martinh@gp.co.nz
|
||
|
Wellington
|
||
|
New Zealand Phone : +64 4 4965648
|
||
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: shane@inferno.peri.com (Shane Bouslough)
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From article <1887@balrog.ctron.com>, by dj@ctron.com (DJ Delorie):
|
||
|
> We just got this one (source file name changed to protect the innocent):
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> "foo.cc", line 204: internal <<AT&T C++ Translator 2.1.0 03/31/90>> error:
|
||
|
> bus error (or something nasty like that)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Masscomp C compiler:
|
||
|
"Insane structure member list"
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.org (Joe Morris)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In most cases I've found that a good way to find out what you can do with
|
||
|
a language is to read well-written descriptions of what you *can't* do
|
||
|
with it. I got into systems programming in the early 1960s by reading
|
||
|
the error message listings in the FORTRAN compiler, first for the 7090
|
||
|
FMS and later in IBSYS. Of course, in today's world the vendors would
|
||
|
have collective apoplexy if anyone seriously asked to see the compiler
|
||
|
sources, and the error message descriptions seem to routinely go something
|
||
|
like this:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Error ABC123D: User Error
|
||
|
|
||
|
Explanation: An unknown error has occurred in an unidentified program
|
||
|
while executing an unimplemented function at an
|
||
|
undefined address.
|
||
|
|
||
|
User Response: Correct error and resubmit.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: rvdp@cs.vu.nl (Ronald van der Pol)
|
||
|
|
||
|
jdavis@noao.edu (Jim Davis) writes:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>Well, I've seen the "You are a charlatan" in a mail context before,
|
||
|
>though only on a DEC-20. Lessee, any DEC-20s left... :-(
|
||
|
|
||
|
(this is what an older version of MMDF says)
|
||
|
|
||
|
telnet deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl smtp
|
||
|
Trying 130.37.48.1 ...
|
||
|
Connected to deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl.
|
||
|
Escape character is '^]'.
|
||
|
220 deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl Server SMTP (Complaints/bugs to: postmaster)
|
||
|
helo foo.bar
|
||
|
250 deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl - Liar, Liar! Pants on Fire!
|
||
|
quit
|
||
|
221 deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl says goodbye to kappl.cs.vu.nl at Tue Jul 30 22:13:43
|
||
|
.
|
||
|
Connection closed by foreign host.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
>From: brad@arkham.wimsey.bc.ca (Brad Murray)
|
||
|
|
||
|
I was just installing PCSA version 4.0 for DOS on a machine here, and after the
|
||
|
boot I got a system error. Okay, no problem, I do a quick
|
||
|
|
||
|
USE \\HOSTNAME
|
||
|
|
||
|
to see if the machine knows anything about the host. Lo and behold, it does
|
||
|
but it refuses to tell me:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Error: Success
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|