617 lines
25 KiB
Plaintext
617 lines
25 KiB
Plaintext
|
From: ap105053@kivikkorastas.cs.tut.fi (Antti Paarlahti)
|
|||
|
Newsgroups: rec.video
|
|||
|
Subject: Macrovision FAQ v1.0
|
|||
|
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland, Europe
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Since this copy protection thread has surfaced again, I might offer you
|
|||
|
some reading. I have appointed myself as the maintainer of the Macrovision
|
|||
|
FAQ, because nobody else has done so :-)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ap105053@cs.tut.fi .EQU "Antti Paarlahti" ; From Finland
|
|||
|
* This signature intentionally left blank.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
----8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<----
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MACROVISION FAQ v1.0
|
|||
|
====================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Copyright Antti Paarlahti, ap105053@cs.tut.fi
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This file may be freely distributed in electronic form as long as it stays
|
|||
|
complete.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This article has been built upon my original "Macrovision explained"-one
|
|||
|
that was posted to rec.video some time ago. Completely new in this version
|
|||
|
is a "reader-friendly front-end", i.e. an explanation for general audiences
|
|||
|
without technical background. Also some minor modifications have been done
|
|||
|
to the technical section.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Some material has been acquired from the Net and some (most) from my own
|
|||
|
experiments.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
New contributions _and_ new questions are most welcome. Grammar
|
|||
|
corrections are accepted, because I am not a native speaker of English.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Information presented here should be correct as far as _I_ know, but utter
|
|||
|
rubbish may have crept in, so proceed carefully.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contents
|
|||
|
::::::::
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A. What??
|
|||
|
B. A non-technical explanation
|
|||
|
C. A technical explanation
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A. WHAT??
|
|||
|
=========
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. What is Macrovision?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Macrovision is a videotape copy protection method for VHS video cassette
|
|||
|
recorders. It is used on pre-recorded videotapes, and it seems to be more
|
|||
|
common in North America than in Europe. If you want a tape that will have
|
|||
|
Macrovision, get a Disney one.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(Someone else might know who invented, marketed and/or used it, etc.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. What does it look like?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
When dubbing a protected tape, the picture that has gone through the
|
|||
|
recording VCR will get dark and then normal again periodically. The picture
|
|||
|
may also become unstable when it is at its darkest.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Some televisions do not like Macrovision either; the top of the picture
|
|||
|
might be unstable all the time and the colors may flicker.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If you have a TV that has an adjustement for picture height or vertical
|
|||
|
hold, you can play with those. Macrovision signals can be seen as very
|
|||
|
bright and very dark regions (stripes) near the top of the picture.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3. Is there an easy and economical way to get rid of it?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Not really. There are three main alternatives:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- Modify the VCR. It is easy in principle, just change the value of one
|
|||
|
capacitor or resistor in the destination deck. The problem is, you'd
|
|||
|
probably have to get a service manual to find out which one. Furthermore,
|
|||
|
you still don't get rid of the protection; it just makes the copying
|
|||
|
possible.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- Make an eliminator yourself. It is a relatively straightforward task
|
|||
|
(more in the technical section), _if_ you know electronics. Most
|
|||
|
people don't, unfortunately.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- Buy a commercial "stabilizer". This method is definitely easy, but not
|
|||
|
the cheapest.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
B. A non-technical explanation
|
|||
|
==============================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Here is a simple explanation of how the method works. It exploits the
|
|||
|
automatic gain control (AGC) circuit in the recorder. The purpose of the
|
|||
|
AGC is to adjust the level of the video signal in such a way that the
|
|||
|
recording capabilities of the tape are fully used. This means that weak
|
|||
|
signals are amplified and strong ones are attenuated.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the Macrovision method, some new signals are inserted in the non-visible
|
|||
|
portion of the picture. These signals can make the VCR think that a
|
|||
|
perfectly normal picture is suddenly way, way too bright. The AGC circuit
|
|||
|
therefore darkens it until it thinks the brightness is normal. Of course,
|
|||
|
now the _real_ picture is very dark. The picture is varied between bright
|
|||
|
and dark periodically in order to defeat simple eliminators that would just
|
|||
|
amplify the dark and murky signal back to almost normal.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Why isn't the TV affected? Well, most TV sets do not have any AGC-circuits
|
|||
|
at all, and the rest behave differently from VHS ones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. My friend has a VHS VCR that is not affected. How is this possible?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The proper behaviour of the AGC-circuit is very important in order to
|
|||
|
achieve good protection. Apparently the specifications were somewhat
|
|||
|
"loose" in the pre-Macrovision days, so the old (how old?) machines are not
|
|||
|
affected.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
JVC, the VHS license holder, has tightened the spec and the control, so it
|
|||
|
is difficult to get an "immune" VCR, but there are some machines that are
|
|||
|
conveniently "out of spec". No, I don't know which ones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. I have heard that 8mm video is not affected by it. Is this true?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
8mm video is not affected by Macrovision, because it is totally separate
|
|||
|
>from VHS. There is no need to have AGC circuits that bear any resemblance
|
|||
|
to JVC ones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Of course, 8mm recorders do not remove the protection, so any subsequent
|
|||
|
VHS dub will again be unwatchable.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3. Can Macrovision be defeated by copying via the aerial inputs/outputs?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
No, it can't. There was some ancient method that could be eliminated
|
|||
|
like that, but it is now long dead. Macrovision is so integrated in the
|
|||
|
video signal that these simple tricks will not work.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4. There are many mail-order companies in the USA selling those boxes.
|
|||
|
Can I buy one and use it in Europe?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
No, not really. You might get some improvement, but the protection
|
|||
|
timings are sufficiently different to keep it from working properly.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5. My TV does not get a stable picture, when I watch rental tapes. Could
|
|||
|
this be a fault of the copy protection?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Yes, very likely. Macrovision signals resemble false synchronization
|
|||
|
pulses, and some sets mistake them for the real ones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
6. Can laserdiscs have Macrovision?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Apparently no. First of all, it is technically difficult, because the region
|
|||
|
used by Macrovision is also used to hold control data for the laserdisc
|
|||
|
players. Secondly, as long as the laserdisc market stays as a niche market,
|
|||
|
the distributors will not pressure the manufacturers to change the specs.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
C. A technical explanation
|
|||
|
==========================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In this part, I represent the empirical data about "Macrovision in
|
|||
|
action" that I have gathered with my trusty 20+ year old oscilloscope.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The main topics are:
|
|||
|
- current PAL Macrovision
|
|||
|
- old NTSC Macrovision
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
==>> REQUEST: If anyone can analyze the rumoured new NTSC Macrovision
|
|||
|
and send the data to me, I'd be very grateful. It's pretty hard to get
|
|||
|
NTSC tapes here.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Tapes that I used were Disney's Beauty and the Beast (PAL) and 101
|
|||
|
Dalmatians (NTSC).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
NB: From here, it gets very technical. A basic knowledge of what video
|
|||
|
signal looks like is required.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
First, some basics. A television picture consists of 25/30 (PAL/NTSC)
|
|||
|
_frames_. Every frame contains a total of 625/525 _lines_ (not all are
|
|||
|
visible, though). Frames are _interlaced_, i.e. they are divided into
|
|||
|
two _fields_ that are drawn on top of another in such a way that the
|
|||
|
first field scans every alternate line and the second field 'fills in'
|
|||
|
the missing lines. The scanning is from top to bottom and from left to
|
|||
|
right.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The fields are separated by _vertical synchronization_ pulses. The lines
|
|||
|
are separated by _horizontal synchronization_ pulses. Both PAL and NTSC
|
|||
|
standards specify that those approximately 20 lines that follow a
|
|||
|
vertical sync are not to be used in forming the picture. These lines are
|
|||
|
not visible in properly adjusted TVs, so they can e.g. carry TeleText
|
|||
|
data, or, in our case, Macrovision copy protection signals (see pictures
|
|||
|
1 and 2). The vertical sync and invisible lines form the _vertical
|
|||
|
blanking region_.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Macrovision
|
|||
|
===========
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
So, what is the trick with Macrovision? In order to understand that,
|
|||
|
some knowledge of VHS AGC circuits is needed (AGC==Automatic Gain
|
|||
|
Control). The AGC circuits adjust the amplitude of the video (luminance)
|
|||
|
signal by measuring the voltage difference between the bottom of the
|
|||
|
horizontal sync and the back (rear) porch (see picture 3). Chrominance
|
|||
|
AGC is measured from the color burst.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
What Macrovision does is to introduce false synchronization pulses
|
|||
|
followed by false back porches at a very high voltage level (~15% over
|
|||
|
white level). The VHS VCR looks at the signal and thinks that it is fed
|
|||
|
with an extremely high-amplitude signal and adjusts the gain control to
|
|||
|
minimum --> the real picture gets very dim (see pictures 4 and 5).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The AGC response must be like this:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- React _fast_ (in a few lines time) to an apparent increase in
|
|||
|
amplitude by attenuating the signal.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- React _slowly_ (in a few frames time) to an apparent decrease in
|
|||
|
amplitude by amplifying the signal.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In the following pictures '|' represents a vertical synchronization
|
|||
|
pulse. Because of interlacing, the sync pulses of corresponding lines
|
|||
|
in different fields are spaced 1/2 lines apart. The fields are drawn on
|
|||
|
top of another because 1) my 'scope shows them like this, and 2) the
|
|||
|
fields are nearly identical anyway.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The scale of the video signal pictures:
|
|||
|
- sync bottoms are 2 characters below black level
|
|||
|
- white level is 5 characters above black level
|
|||
|
- Macrovision signal peaks are 6 characters above black level
|
|||
|
(a reasonably good approximation)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picture 1: PAL vertical blanking region with Macrovision
|
|||
|
--------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Scope Interlace Macrovision regions
|
|||
|
trigger starts ...........................................
|
|||
|
: : 1 2 1 2
|
|||
|
: : 1 Region 1 2 1 Region 2 2
|
|||
|
: Vertical sync : 1 (between '1's) 2 1 (between '2's) 2
|
|||
|
: : 1 2 1 2
|
|||
|
_ _ _ _ _ ________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|_|_|_|_|_| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
|
|||
|
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 3
|
|||
|
1 4 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 8 6 9 7 0 8 1 9 2 0 3 1 4 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 8 6 9 7 0 8 1 9 2
|
|||
|
The number of the scanline starting after this sync pulse
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
:
|
|||
|
: Picture
|
|||
|
: start
|
|||
|
:
|
|||
|
______________________...
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3 3 3 3 3 3
|
|||
|
3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3
|
|||
|
2 0 3 1 4 2 5 3 6 4 7
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I'll explain those regions later. It is very easy to calculate the
|
|||
|
required timing for a Macrovision eliminator from this picture (more
|
|||
|
later, also). There are other line numbering systems, but this is "time
|
|||
|
sequential".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picture 2: NTSC vertical blanking region with Macrovision
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Scope Interlace Macrovision region Picture
|
|||
|
trigger starts ................................... start
|
|||
|
: : : : :
|
|||
|
: : : : :
|
|||
|
: Vertical sync : : : :
|
|||
|
: : : : :
|
|||
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ ____________________________________________________
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|_|_|_|_|_|_| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
|
|||
|
6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 8 1 8 1 8
|
|||
|
1 4 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 8 6 9 7 0 8 1 9 2 0 3 1 4 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 8 6 9 7 0 8 1 9 2
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As can be observed, NTSC timing is a little bit tighter. I'm not sure
|
|||
|
about the line numbering, because I have no NTSC-references, so please
|
|||
|
correct me.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Now, what do those lines inside Macrovision regions contain? Back to
|
|||
|
basics, once again.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picture 3: PAL/NTSC normal line
|
|||
|
-------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This is one normal PAL/NTSC scanline as seen on an oscilloscope screen.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Time in microseconds
|
|||
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1
|
|||
|
0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123012345678901
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
___________________________________________________ ______
|
|||
|
| ^-- White level | |
|
|||
|
| | Color |
|
|||
|
| Arbitrary picture data | burst--v |
|
|||
|
| | |
|
|||
|
_MM_|___________________________________________________|_ _MM_|______
|
|||
|
| WW ^-- Black level | | WW
|
|||
|
| |____|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Front porch --^ ^ ^-- Back
|
|||
|
Horizontal | porch
|
|||
|
synchronization --+
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Here are both the PAL and NTSC Macrovision 'magic' lines that do the
|
|||
|
trick. Both are shown at their maximum amplitudes.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picture 4: PAL Macrovision line
|
|||
|
-------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1
|
|||
|
0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123012345678901
|
|||
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
_MM__ | | | | | | | | | | | | | |__________________ _MM__ | |
|
|||
|
| WW | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | WW | | |
|
|||
|
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |____| |_| |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picture 5: NTSC Macrovision line
|
|||
|
--------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1
|
|||
|
0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123012345678901
|
|||
|
__ __ __ __ __
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
_MM__ | |__ | |__ | |__ | |_______________________ _MM__ | |
|
|||
|
| WW | | | | | | | | | | WW | |
|
|||
|
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |____| |_|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The lines drawn above are quite similar. Both try to present false
|
|||
|
synchronization pulses to the VCR the first 40 microseconds or so. The
|
|||
|
rest of the line is black, because false syncs there would trigger the
|
|||
|
sync circuits in monitors/TVs and consequently the top of the picture
|
|||
|
would be very unstable. Some TVs really do suffer even now, I have seen
|
|||
|
it myself.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
But that is not all. If the pulses had a constant amplitude, it would be
|
|||
|
quite easy just to increase the amplitude of the video signal and get a
|
|||
|
decent picture. Therefore the false back porch voltage level is varied
|
|||
|
according to some simple rules in order to get the brightness changes as
|
|||
|
annoying as possible.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The following pictures show, how the false back porch amplitudes change
|
|||
|
with time. The lowest level is black, the highest is "super-white". The
|
|||
|
false syncs (below black level) do not change their amplitude. The
|
|||
|
perceived brightness of the TV picture is the inverse, e.g. the highest
|
|||
|
level in the diagram means the darkest picture on the screen.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picture 6: Pulsating cycles, PAL
|
|||
|
--------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
_____________________ ___...
|
|||
|
/ \ R1 R1 R1 /
|
|||
|
/ \ ___ ___ ___ /
|
|||
|
/ \ || | | | | | | | /
|
|||
|
/ \ || | | | | | | | /
|
|||
|
/ \ ||___|R2 |___|R2 |___|R2 |___| /
|
|||
|
/ \|| |___| |___| |___| |/
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
: : : :: : : : : : : : :
|
|||
|
: 2s : 7s : 2.3s ::32f:32f:32f:32f:32f:32f:32f: 2s :
|
|||
|
: : : :: : : : : : : : :
|
|||
|
10f 2f
|
|||
|
<-- ~9s -->
|
|||
|
R1 = lines in region 1
|
|||
|
R2 = lines in region 2
|
|||
|
f = frames
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Here is where the two regions differ. When R1 rises to ~60% of max
|
|||
|
amplitude, R2 goes to black. Otherwise they change in parallel.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picture 7:Pulsating cycles, NTSC
|
|||
|
--------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
____________________..._________________ _____...
|
|||
|
/ \ /
|
|||
|
/ \ /
|
|||
|
/ \ /
|
|||
|
/ \ /
|
|||
|
/ \ /
|
|||
|
/ \_______/
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
: : : : : :
|
|||
|
:3.5s : 22s : 5s : 4s :3.5s :
|
|||
|
: : : : : :
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As can be seen, old NTSC-Macrovision cycle is very simple. Please, once
|
|||
|
again, send me information about the new one.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
All the slopes and the stable regions between them are timed in seconds,
|
|||
|
because a) the timing is not so critical and b) it is difficult to say
|
|||
|
in which frame a slope starts or ends.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
How to eliminate
|
|||
|
----------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Here is a small disclaimer-type paragraph: I have built an eliminator and
|
|||
|
have used it for backing up my own precious videotapes. Try, for example,
|
|||
|
get a replacement for your damaged "The Little Mermaid" videotape. You're
|
|||
|
lucky, if you succeed. I almost never rent videotapes; the picture sucks
|
|||
|
and they are usually "pan-and-scan" transfers. And the last reason: I'm a
|
|||
|
hardware hacker, so I did it just for the heck of it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Macrovision elimination is _very_ simple, if you have some knowledge of
|
|||
|
electronics. My primary inspiration was
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Macrovision decoder/blanker"
|
|||
|
Elektor Electronics, October 1988, pp. 44-47.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(Note: it features an older version of Macrovision; not that different,
|
|||
|
though.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I built roughly an equivalent circuit myself, but it was higly
|
|||
|
unsatisfactory. Reasons:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1) The circuit assumes that the incoming video signal has a certain
|
|||
|
amplitude ==> it uses fixed voltages and signal levels, which do not
|
|||
|
work properly (because of varying input level and unaccurate clamping).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2) Too many cheap electronic switches along the signal path ==> visibly
|
|||
|
worsened picture quality (soft, color fluctuations).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3) Chops off color burst from protected lines ==> horrible color purity
|
|||
|
errors near the top edge of the picture (perhaps the most visible error).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Below is a block diagram of my currently satisfactorily working device.
|
|||
|
It resembles only remotely the EE one. The basic idea is that the
|
|||
|
Macrovision pulses are replaced with a black level. I challenge anyone
|
|||
|
to make a simpler device.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Picture 8: Block diagram
|
|||
|
------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
video _______ _____ _____
|
|||
|
in >------+----->| sync |>------------>| |>-->| |>-+
|
|||
|
| | sepa | vsync |delay| | MMV | | Pulse
|
|||
|
| | rator | | | | 1 | | that
|
|||
|
| |_______|>-------+ |_____| |_____| | lasts
|
|||
|
| LM1881 burst | region | the
|
|||
|
| | start | whole
|
|||
|
electr. 0| | | Macrov.
|
|||
|
switch ___|_ | _ | region
|
|||
|
| o | insert_black | | |<-------------+
|
|||
|
+-----o/ |<----------------------------<|&|
|
|||
|
| |___o_| | |_|<--------+
|
|||
|
| | | |
|
|||
|
| 1| black | |~45us pulse
|
|||
|
| | level | | that covers
|
|||
|
| | | | the false
|
|||
|
| __^_____ | | syncs
|
|||
|
| | | | |
|
|||
|
| | sample |sample_now | line_start _____ |
|
|||
|
+--->| and |<----------------+---------->| |>-+
|
|||
|
| | hold | | MMV |
|
|||
|
| |________| | 2 |
|
|||
|
| sample black level |_____|
|
|||
|
| from back porch
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
| ________
|
|||
|
| | |
|
|||
|
| | video | video
|
|||
|
+--->| output |>--------->
|
|||
|
| buffer | out
|
|||
|
|________|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Some explanations:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- Sync separator is the small and cheap LM1881. Only vertical sync and
|
|||
|
burst gate are used. I mention the explixit type here, because the
|
|||
|
device is practically built around it and because it replaces a whole
|
|||
|
chunk of analog electronics.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- The sample and hold circuit is used to sample the black level. Although
|
|||
|
the sampling occurs at color burst time, I have not experienced any
|
|||
|
difficulties. 2 opamps, 1 electronic switch and a capacitor make a
|
|||
|
wonderful S&H circuit. The sampling input is from the output of the
|
|||
|
video switch, because the false syncs trigger LM1881, too.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- The delay block delays the vertical sync until the Macrovision region is
|
|||
|
about to begin.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- MMV 1 (monostable multivibrator) is triggered when the Macrovision region
|
|||
|
starts and produces a pulse that lasts until the end of the region.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- MMV 2 is triggered at the end of the burst gate and it produces a pulse
|
|||
|
that lasts about 45 us == until all false syncs are gone. This MMV must
|
|||
|
not be retriggerable within the pulse, because the false syncs come
|
|||
|
through LM1881 and try to retrigger.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- The video output buffer can be a transistor or two. It does not need to
|
|||
|
have any voltage gain, because the VCR has the AGC circuits. If it
|
|||
|
doesn't, you dont't need this circuit in the first place!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I do have the whole circuit as a 2-color IFF-ILBM picture (Amiga native
|
|||
|
format). I am able to convert it into almost any format, if anyone is
|
|||
|
interested. Surely no-one is... B^)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Other methods
|
|||
|
==============
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One method that I have seen on some old rental cassettes is the changing
|
|||
|
of horizontal sync amplitude in the middle of a frame. When dubbed, the
|
|||
|
AGC circuits change the gain to keep the sync amplitude constant, and
|
|||
|
the resulting picture has very noticeable bands of bright and dim
|
|||
|
picture.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Original frame
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
v--- constant grey level
|
|||
|
...........................................................................
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
___________________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(The amplitude change is somewhat exaggerated)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Dubbed result
|
|||
|
.............. ............
|
|||
|
. . . .
|
|||
|
.............. .................... ...........
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
___________________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Disadvantages of this method:
|
|||
|
- All the patterns I have seen have been stationary, so you can get used
|
|||
|
to it.
|
|||
|
- It is effective only in dark pictures; it is virtually unnoticeable in
|
|||
|
bright pictures.
|
|||
|
- If TV/monitor uses sync tip clamping, banding becomes visible, although
|
|||
|
it is less disturbing and reversed:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
.............. ...................... .........
|
|||
|
................ ..............
|
|||
|
______________ ______________________ __________
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | ________________| | | | | | | | | | | ______________| | | | |
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Remedy: clamp to front or back porch and re-create sync.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Another method I have seen is to place a color subcarrier burst at the
|
|||
|
bottom of the horizontal synchronization pulse:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
..._ _MM___...
|
|||
|
| | WW
|
|||
|
|MMMM|
|
|||
|
WWWW
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The only effect I noticed was that the colors changed a little, when
|
|||
|
switching between 'clean' sync and 'bursted' sync. Does anyone
|
|||
|
guess what it is supposed to be doing?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
OK, this is the end. Thank you for reading. Happy hacking.
|
|||
|
----8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<----
|