421 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
421 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Test Free (tm) - The Ultimate Defense Against Urine Tests!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
This file contains information on urinalysis, as well as information on a
|
||
|
|
||
|
product designed to help people defeat urinalysis.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Transcribed by the Dak - 8/3/90 - Holiday Inn, Cambodia BBS - 209/456-8584
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Drug use is a problem. We, as citizens, shouldn't stop worrying about
|
||
|
|
||
|
the problem. But maybe we should start worrying about the solution! To
|
||
|
|
||
|
some, the solution to the American drug catastrophe is simple...MASS DRUG
|
||
|
|
||
|
TESTING! Could it be? Think of it! All we have to do is make everyone pee
|
||
|
|
||
|
in a cup and POOF! The national cancer of drug abuse will disappear faster
|
||
|
|
||
|
than the family farm!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Why did your national drug problem suddenly become the focus of
|
||
|
|
||
|
political and business decisions? Given the speed and enthusiasm with which
|
||
|
|
||
|
many of our elected officials and business leaders have accepted drug testing
|
||
|
|
||
|
as a cure-all, did this change mean there was a sudden worsening of the
|
||
|
|
||
|
problem? The National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) estimates that nearly
|
||
|
|
||
|
two-thirds of those entering the work force have used illegal drugs...44%
|
||
|
|
||
|
within the past year. But, ironically, the current craze for wide-scale drug
|
||
|
|
||
|
testing has gained populatiry just when most types of drug use are stable or
|
||
|
|
||
|
beginning to drop. NIDA reports that for all drugs except cocaine, current
|
||
|
|
||
|
rates are, for the first time below those of 1979...our peak year of drug
|
||
|
|
||
|
use!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
"No person...shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
|
||
|
|
||
|
himself." - Fifth Amendment
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
So why the frenzy now? Drugs are just too good a political issue!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Wide-spread drug tests make it look as though our national leaders are "doing
|
||
|
|
||
|
something about the problem! Drug testing seems to be the product of
|
||
|
|
||
|
election-year sculpturing and well-timed and well-financed marketing efforts
|
||
|
|
||
|
by the test manufacturers! Sales of drug tests have recently gotten a big
|
||
|
|
||
|
boost from the attitudes and orders of the Reagan administration, which has
|
||
|
|
||
|
recommended a drug testing program that will affect most American workers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Strangely, drug testing is becoming wide-spread in spite of general
|
||
|
|
||
|
agreement that the results of mass tests are more often than not grossly
|
||
|
|
||
|
inaccurate! Studies of laboratory accuracy have confirmed ridiculously high
|
||
|
|
||
|
error rates. One group of researchers reported a 70% rate of "false-
|
||
|
|
||
|
positives", while other groups have claimed that the rate of "false-
|
||
|
|
||
|
positives" have been closer to 100%! False-positive mistakes (identifying a
|
||
|
|
||
|
"clean" urine sample as containing an illegal drug) are far more serious than
|
||
|
|
||
|
any false-negative mistakes. This is because false-positives can, and have,
|
||
|
|
||
|
resulted in innocent people losing their jobs...or not being hired at all.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ironically, since the ERROR RATES derived from the drug tests are HIGHER than
|
||
|
|
||
|
the ACTUAL RATE OF ILLEGAL DRUG USE in the general working population, as
|
||
|
|
||
|
reported by NIDA, the tests are far more likely to label INNOCENT PEOPLE AS
|
||
|
|
||
|
DRUG USERS than to identify REAL USERS! Wouldn't you or your mother love to
|
||
|
|
||
|
be labeled an "addict" after taking a couple of Advils for that holiday
|
||
|
|
||
|
headache?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Urine tests are overly sensitive to marijuana; detecting chemical by-
|
||
|
|
||
|
products for months after use!"
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Many false-positive results stem from "cross-reactivity". This refers
|
||
|
|
||
|
to the fact that hundreds of over-the-counter medications, vitamins,
|
||
|
|
||
|
prescription drugs and even everyday food items can produce false-positive
|
||
|
|
||
|
results on these tests! For example, Contac, Sudafed, most diet
|
||
|
|
||
|
preparations, decongestants, heart and asthma medications can all register as
|
||
|
|
||
|
amphetamines on the tests. Over-the-counter cough syrup can cross-react as
|
||
|
|
||
|
opiates and antibiotics show up as cocaine! Anti-inflammatory drugs and
|
||
|
|
||
|
common pain-killers, including Datril, Advil and Nuprin show up as marijuana.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Even those poppy seeds on your dinner roll can cause a positive result for
|
||
|
|
||
|
morphine...and some herbal teas show up as cocaine! And tonic water...common
|
||
|
|
||
|
in mixed drinks...makes it look as though you are shooting heroin!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Commercial testing companies always claim very high accuracy and
|
||
|
|
||
|
reliability, but these labs are not uniformly regulated and employers who
|
||
|
|
||
|
buy their services find it impossible to confirm these claims or even to
|
||
|
|
||
|
conduct informed comparative shopping! The companies that mass-market
|
||
|
|
||
|
testing kits (such as the popular EMITs...which cost an estimated $15 to $25
|
||
|
|
||
|
per test) always recommend that positive test results be confirmed with other
|
||
|
|
||
|
laboratory procedures, which can run from $100 to $200 per test! But,
|
||
|
|
||
|
relatively few employers are using the expensive back-up procedure before
|
||
|
|
||
|
firing employees who test positive. Even when employers DO verify positive
|
||
|
|
||
|
results, employees who, upon retesting, turn out to be drug-free will be
|
||
|
|
||
|
stigmatized! TWO to THREE tests are sometimes needed for conclusive results,
|
||
|
|
||
|
and even then they DO NOT DIFFERENTIATE between someone who has tried drugs
|
||
|
|
||
|
ONCE and someone who's a chronic user! The tests CANNOT tell WHEN a drug was
|
||
|
|
||
|
ingested, and if a drug was taken at home or at a party on a WEEKEND, should
|
||
|
|
||
|
an employee be penalized for that? URINALYSIS CAN REVEAL A LOT ABOUT
|
||
|
|
||
|
OFF-THE-JOB ACTIVITIES, BUT IT TELLS NOTHING ABOUT JOB PERFORMANCE!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another critical failing of these tests are their limited sensitivity to
|
||
|
|
||
|
certain drugs (A shortcoming their manufacturers readily admit.) Cocaine,
|
||
|
|
||
|
the only illicit drug whose use has risen is the one drug to which the tests
|
||
|
|
||
|
are the least sensitive. By contrast, urine tests are...if anything...OVERLY
|
||
|
|
||
|
SENSITIVE TO MARIJUANA; detecting chemical by-products (not its ACTIVE
|
||
|
|
||
|
ingredient) for MONTHS after use, and even picking up the residue of passive
|
||
|
|
||
|
inhalation!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
"...the right of the people to be secure in their persons...against
|
||
|
|
||
|
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..." - Fourth
|
||
|
|
||
|
Amendment.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Also note that there is one "drug" nobody is saying much
|
||
|
|
||
|
about...alcohol. Nearly 25,000,000 Americans are alcoholic or problem
|
||
|
|
||
|
drinkers. Alcohol is legal, but potentially detrimental to job performance.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alcoholism costs us almost 200 billion dollars a year in lost work, medical
|
||
|
|
||
|
expenses, car wrecks and the removal of stubborn carpet stans. Booze is
|
||
|
|
||
|
responsible for nearly 100,000 deaths per year and who knows how many dumb
|
||
|
|
||
|
marriages! There are simple, cheap, accurate tests for alcohol use.
|
||
|
|
||
|
However, nearly two-thirds of American adults drink...and that's A LOT OF
|
||
|
|
||
|
VOTERS! So alcohol testing is done SPARINGLY, with PROBABLE CAUSE, under
|
||
|
|
||
|
HIGHLY JUSTIFIABLE circumstances...usually when you're driving home nude from
|
||
|
|
||
|
a New Year's Eve party! Nobody is trying to make alcohol tests a regular
|
||
|
|
||
|
feature of work, school or sports, let alone Government employment! How many
|
||
|
|
||
|
congressmen would care to be tested after 6:00 p.m.? FRESHEN UP THAT DRINK
|
||
|
|
||
|
FOR YOU SENATOR?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Probably one of the greatest costs of mass drug testing involve
|
||
|
|
||
|
violations of worker's rights and the poor employee morale and broken trust
|
||
|
|
||
|
that result when workers must prove themselves from the PRESUMPTION OF GUILT!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
And don't forget the INVASION OF THE WORKER'S PRIVACY! Urinalysis may
|
||
|
|
||
|
be great at revealing who is pregnant, who is diabetic, and a host of other
|
||
|
|
||
|
conditions, but it's very difficult to imagine how scatter-shot drug testing
|
||
|
|
||
|
could be acceptable...let alone LEGAL under the Fourth Amendment which is
|
||
|
|
||
|
clear that..."The right of the people to be secure in thier persons...against
|
||
|
|
||
|
unreasonable searches and seizures, whall not be violated..." Searches are
|
||
|
|
||
|
permitted only "upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and
|
||
|
|
||
|
particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things
|
||
|
|
||
|
to be seized." How could this type of testing be legal no matter how
|
||
|
|
||
|
"PARTICULARLY" the government describes the manner in which one urinates?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
And the Fifth Amendment is also clear: "no person...shall be compelled
|
||
|
|
||
|
in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." If using the contents
|
||
|
|
||
|
of your bladder as evidence isn't making you a witness against yourself,
|
||
|
|
||
|
then what would that be considered as doing? Even people accused of the most
|
||
|
|
||
|
HEINOUS crimes are assured of this minimum protection from Government
|
||
|
|
||
|
intrusion!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
With all the critical failings, why has drug testing become so popular?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Maybe some of the real solutions, such as education, rehabilitation, and
|
||
|
|
||
|
medical research are difficult and complex...much like reality itself. (And
|
||
|
|
||
|
reality is one thing politicians could never stand too much of!) Drug
|
||
|
|
||
|
testing is simple, objective and not easily challenged because it relies on
|
||
|
|
||
|
technology that very few understand. It's quicker and cheaper than serious
|
||
|
|
||
|
and sustained efforts to reduce illegal drug use...such as the mass
|
||
|
|
||
|
educational efforts that have successfully reduced cigarette smoking.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
While drug testing does little to combat the Real problem of drug use,
|
||
|
|
||
|
it reinforces the employers ILLUSION of "DOING SOMETHING"! Apparently, some
|
||
|
|
||
|
employers would rather test employees for drugs than build a relationship
|
||
|
|
||
|
with them based on confidence and loyalty! A relationship doesn't just come
|
||
|
|
||
|
from a paycheck! When you say to an employee, "You're doing a great job with
|
||
|
|
||
|
us, but just the same I want to you pee in this cup and I'm sending someone
|
||
|
|
||
|
to watch you", you've UNDERMINED that trust!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Drug tests create an atmosphere of distrust, resentment and
|
||
|
|
||
|
demoralization! Does any country in its right mind want an entire population
|
||
|
|
||
|
feeling this way about its Government? Are we going to allow the Government
|
||
|
|
||
|
and private employers to make an unprecedented and probably irreversible
|
||
|
|
||
|
intrusion into our private lives? If so this could very well be the first
|
||
|
|
||
|
step towards totalitarianism!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
About our Company
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zydot Unlimited, Inc. is not an "Anti-law" organization, nor are we
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Pro-drug"...we are ANTI-DRUG TESTING! We are representatives of the
|
||
|
|
||
|
public...here to protect and preserve the Constitutional Rights of the
|
||
|
|
||
|
American citizen.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
We do not promote or condone irrespnsible or illegal drug use of any
|
||
|
|
||
|
kind. Our product Test Free (tm) was not developed as an aid for the drug
|
||
|
|
||
|
abuser, but as a defense against this most serious threat to our liberty.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Test Free (tm) is a safe and simple means of INSURANCE to be used as
|
||
|
|
||
|
protection from unqualified laboratories, undertrained technicians,
|
||
|
|
||
|
inaccurate tests, hundreds of cross-reactive over-the-counter and
|
||
|
|
||
|
prescription medications, and even food items that can and do cause false-
|
||
|
|
||
|
positive test results.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Positive drug test results have had a devastating impact on a multitude
|
||
|
|
||
|
of innocent people...drastically changing and sometimes destroying their
|
||
|
|
||
|
lives. Yet, these urine tests are incapable of measuring impairment or on-
|
||
|
|
||
|
the-job performance, nor can they prove or disprove that a person is a "drug
|
||
|
|
||
|
user".
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
We would like to help educate the public and make them aware of the fact
|
||
|
|
||
|
that urine testing is a technology that is being iproperly applied and that
|
||
|
|
||
|
current testing programs do not and cannot provide information of sufficient
|
||
|
|
||
|
reliability to guide decision-makers. We feel the public has every right to
|
||
|
|
||
|
defend themselves if faced with this unconstitutional situation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Pass your urinalysis with TEST FREE (tm)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Eliminates any substance that could trigger a positive urine test result.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
- All natural ingredients
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Works in less than 2 hours
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Effective 4 to 5 hours
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Mix with water and drink
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Undetectable in urine
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Not a drug
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Money back guarantee
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
This product was designed for personal use only and is not to be sold to or
|
||
|
|
||
|
used by anyone undergoing a lawfully administered urine test.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zydot Unlimited, Inc. (tm)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
918/747-2400
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
|
||
|
Another file downloaded from: The NIRVANAnet(tm) Seven
|
||
|
|
||
|
& the Temple of the Screaming Electron Taipan Enigma 510/935-5845
|
||
|
Burn This Flag Zardoz 408/363-9766
|
||
|
realitycheck Poindexter Fortran 510/527-1662
|
||
|
Lies Unlimited Mick Freen 801/278-2699
|
||
|
The New Dork Sublime Biffnix 415/864-DORK
|
||
|
The Shrine Rif Raf 206/794-6674
|
||
|
Planet Mirth Simon Jester 510/786-6560
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Raw Data for Raw Nerves"
|
||
|
X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
|