102 lines
4.8 KiB
Plaintext
102 lines
4.8 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
||
|
|
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 7 Num. 75
|
||
|
|
======================================
|
||
|
|
("Quid coniuratio est?")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
BLOOD SPORT
|
||
|
|
===========
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The title of James B. Stewart's much bally-hooed book, *Blood
|
||
|
|
Sport* is said to be derived from Vincent Foster's supposed
|
||
|
|
"suicide note": Foster supposedly complained that in Washington
|
||
|
|
D.C. "ruining people is considered sport." So because Foster
|
||
|
|
died a bloody death, we have a bloody sport -- get it? "Blood
|
||
|
|
Sport."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
So notes Foster death expert Hugh Sprunt in a solid critique of
|
||
|
|
Stewart's book to be found in the May 1996 issue of Media Bypass
|
||
|
|
magazine (1-800-4-BYPASS). Thanks to Kenn Thomas, I also am
|
||
|
|
aware that Conspiracy Nation and Sherman Skolnick both receive
|
||
|
|
one paragraph of attention from Mr. Stewart in his "limited
|
||
|
|
hangout" examination of Bill Clinton & Co. (Alas, Mr. Stewart got
|
||
|
|
it wrong in his coverage of Conspiracy Nation: Sherman Skolnick
|
||
|
|
is a contributor, not the publisher.)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
According to Sprunt, there is a GLARING discrepancy between what
|
||
|
|
Clinton "team player" Susan Thomases had first told the FBI
|
||
|
|
regarding her last meeting with Foster and what she told author
|
||
|
|
Stewart. She had told Stewart that Foster seemed to be under a
|
||
|
|
strain and that he had arranged to meet with Thomases "off
|
||
|
|
campus", at which point he had unburdened himself to her. This
|
||
|
|
is in contrast to Thomases' statement to the FBI wherein she
|
||
|
|
declares that "She noted no change in [Foster's] demeanor or
|
||
|
|
physical appearance... His death came as a complete shock to her
|
||
|
|
and she can offer no reason or speculation as to why he may have
|
||
|
|
taken his life."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Sprunt also examines discrepancies between what Stewart
|
||
|
|
apparently sees as the death weapon and what various witnesses
|
||
|
|
reported: was the Foster "suicide" gun silver or black? Stewart
|
||
|
|
seems to have made a substantial error.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A big question I have is, Why do we find James B. Stewart coming
|
||
|
|
forward at *this* time? Is it time to get the American public's
|
||
|
|
toes wet, prior to throwing them into the cold (White)water?
|
||
|
|
Stewart *is* letting loose with some risque stuff -- startling at
|
||
|
|
least to the average brain-dead American television aficionado.
|
||
|
|
See, for example, an interview with him in the April 28, 1996
|
||
|
|
Chicago Tribune newspaper. Says Stewart:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
** Regarding what President Bill Clinton will say at his
|
||
|
|
April 28 deposition: "I would be astounded if he didn't say
|
||
|
|
what he has already said." Put another way, Stewart would be
|
||
|
|
"astounded" if Clinton were to tell the truth!
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
** "[David] Hale has a lot of credibility problems." And
|
||
|
|
Bill Clinton doesn't!?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
** "[Hillary's] need for money overwhelmed her otherwise...
|
||
|
|
good judgement." Is it "toes in the (White)water" time? Is
|
||
|
|
the American public being gradually prepared for something?
|
||
|
|
Something like an indictment?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
** Says Hillary (according to Stewart) -- "WE are the
|
||
|
|
president."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Why does author Stewart devote just one sentence to the highly
|
||
|
|
credible charges that the Foster "suicide note" was forged? How
|
||
|
|
can media darling Stewart fairly compact the highly sophisticated
|
||
|
|
reportage of Sherman Skolnick into just one paragraph? Why
|
||
|
|
aren't the paid scribblers of the elitist press crying "foul" as
|
||
|
|
to Thomases' "insensitivity" vis a vis her "revelations" about
|
||
|
|
Vince and Lisa Foster's marriage?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The current issue of Media Bypass is a classic. Why can't I find
|
||
|
|
it at my bookstore or library?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
|
||
|
|
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
|
||
|
|
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
For information on how to receive the new Conspiracy Nation
|
||
|
|
Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
|
||
|
|
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
See also: http://www.europa.com/~johnlf/cn.html
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
|
||
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
|
||
|
|
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
|
||
|
|
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9
|
||
|
|
|