136 lines
8.0 KiB
Plaintext
136 lines
8.0 KiB
Plaintext
|
__________________________________________
|
||
|
Tips on Starting Your Own BBS
|
||
|
Written by Pazuzu - November 11, 1993
|
||
|
(C) Copyright 1993 Digital News Associates
|
||
|
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|
||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
|
||
|
Most people, after they've been calling out for a while, eventually come to
|
||
|
the decision that they should start their own BBS. The allure of running
|
||
|
your own board is very strong - you dream of the immense power you'll have to
|
||
|
delete anyone on a whim, to create your own virtual city on-line for people
|
||
|
to call into and live for a few minutes (or hours) each day. However, few
|
||
|
people realize the immense amount of time it takes to set up, configure, and
|
||
|
run a BBS. Having been a SysOp for a number of years, I feel I am qualified
|
||
|
to give a few tips on how to create a successful BBS.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There are a lot of things one must consider when starting a system - what
|
||
|
software to run, what to name the system, what types of files and message
|
||
|
areas to have and so on and so on. One of the most important things about
|
||
|
your system is the name. If you have a lame name, people are going to think
|
||
|
your system is lame (unless you're a CdC site...). Try to avoid generic
|
||
|
names. There are probably about 50,000 bulletin board systems in the U.S.
|
||
|
alone, and I think about 80% of them have very generic names. You should of
|
||
|
course choose a name that is reflective in some way of your system's content
|
||
|
- a good reason why my system is named "DnA Systems, Inc.". Anything with
|
||
|
"Dark" in it is OUT. In my 11 or so years of modeming I have seen so many
|
||
|
"Dark Realm"s, "Dark World"s, etc, to make me want to vomit. BE ORIGINAL!
|
||
|
Or at least try. Also try to avoid using names of famous BBS's of the past.
|
||
|
Especially Cemetary Gates. Cemetary Gates was a HUGE board back in the
|
||
|
mid-80's to early-90's. EVERYONE who has been out here for any length of
|
||
|
time has heard of it and we're all sick of everyone copying its name. This
|
||
|
also includes adding a "II" to the end of the name like "The Drop Site II" or
|
||
|
"Louder Than Bombs II" - this is even worse than just copying the name.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Of course, you must also decide what software to run. The sheer number of
|
||
|
BBS packages available today is insane and it can be very hard to pick one.
|
||
|
You must first consider what features you require and then find out which
|
||
|
softwares have those features. Configurability is also a big issue. You want
|
||
|
to be able to make the BBS look and function the exact way you want it to and
|
||
|
you don't want to spend six years doing so. Networking support is also very
|
||
|
important - if you want to join WWiVNet (goD forbid!), running a forum hack
|
||
|
would be very stupid. It would be totally impossible to go over every
|
||
|
package available, but I shall try to cover the major ones, at least for
|
||
|
MS-DOS systems anyhow.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There are basically three "families" of BBS software out there - The WWiV
|
||
|
hacks and work-a-likes, Forum hacks (1,000's of them), and PCBoard
|
||
|
/ RBBS / Wildcat work-a-likes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The WWiV hacks/work-a-likes are quite numerous. There is of course WWiV
|
||
|
itself (DO NOT run WWiV), then there's Telegard, TAG, Renegade, Dominions,
|
||
|
and Synchronet. NO, Synchronet IS NOT a WWiV hack (I HAVE the source.), but
|
||
|
it looks a lot like it. Telegard and Renegade are quite similar (well, since
|
||
|
Renegade is a Telegard hack I wonder why?). They add a menu editor to the
|
||
|
system so you can make the BBS do whatever you like whenever whatever key is
|
||
|
pressed. Dominions is a Telegard hack with not very much changed. I run
|
||
|
Renegade and like it a lot. It does basically everything, and you can
|
||
|
configure it to look like whatever you want. Synchronet costs quite a bit of
|
||
|
money so you'll probably want to stay away from that unless you can pirate it
|
||
|
from somewhere.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Forum hacks are extremely numerous and they all look the same in the end.
|
||
|
Included are: Vision, Vision/2, VisionX, Liquid (bugs, bugs, bugs), Oblivion,
|
||
|
Celerity (or CELERY as I like to call it), and about 100,000,000 more that I
|
||
|
can't think of right now. There are LOTS. There isn't much to distinguish one
|
||
|
from the other, except the bug level. Liquid is by far the worst I've seen.
|
||
|
Stay away from it unless you are a hardcore masochist. Setting up Fido-type
|
||
|
nets (such as CyberCrime and DnANeT) on forum hacks is notoriously tricky, so
|
||
|
you may want to avoid them if you plan on being in any fido-type nets.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The PCBoard/Wildcat/RBBS/Etc family are utterly hideous and most people I
|
||
|
know won't even CALL a board running them. The message base operation on
|
||
|
these abominations is utterly horrid and the person that invented it should
|
||
|
be flogged. Avoid these softwares like the plague.
|
||
|
|
||
|
After you pick a software, you've got to configure it to the way you want it.
|
||
|
DO NOT run a BBS "out-of-the-box". It looks really lame, and people will
|
||
|
notice right off that you haven't spent any time setting up your system and
|
||
|
aren't likely to call very often. It can be very difficult to set up a BBS,
|
||
|
but the time spent is well worth it. You've got to change prompts and menus,
|
||
|
set up logon and newuser info files, create message and file areas, and
|
||
|
things like that.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You've also got to come up with a "hook" - something that makes your system
|
||
|
different from the billion other systems out there. Mine is the unusual
|
||
|
combination of phreak/hack/virus/etc, conspiracy/legal/political info, and
|
||
|
the occult. It's an unusual combo that many people like, and keep calling
|
||
|
for. It's also one a lot of people have imitated. One I've never seen done
|
||
|
is pirated software and good phreak/hack stuff, without the board becoming
|
||
|
involved in the 0.1 second warezzzzz set. I'd like to see someone pull it
|
||
|
off.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The issue of nets is a big one these days - it seems EVERY system is in one
|
||
|
net or the other. The big problem with nets is that some systems get onto a
|
||
|
net, then become "a netnode". There's nothing to the system but the net. This
|
||
|
is something you want to avoid. If people are calling your system only for
|
||
|
the net, you've got some changes to make. Now, I'm not knocking nets - they
|
||
|
can be great - I'm on 4 of 'em myself. But choose them carefully and DO NOT
|
||
|
allow yourself to become a slave of the net. Most nets these days are of the
|
||
|
Fido-standard variety - a complicated subject for most people. There isn't a
|
||
|
single doc file in existence that attempts to help the fido novice understand
|
||
|
how to set up and run on a fido-type net. Until now, that is. Read my article
|
||
|
on the subject in this issue of DnA BEFORE you set yourself up on one of
|
||
|
these nets. I am SICK of SysOps who can't figure out how to run their mailer,
|
||
|
who make the net coordinator set it up for them, then GO DOWN when something
|
||
|
weird happens with their mailer or echo processor. My article will explain
|
||
|
all you need to know.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Once you get your board up, you've got to advertise. This is usually in the
|
||
|
form of posts on boards you call, or on a net. There is a great rule that N
|
||
|
Sult once told me (you may know him as D-Tox of ACiD, he's long gone now...)
|
||
|
- NEVER ADVERTISE YOUR SYSTEM ON A SYSTEM OF LESS QUALITY - ELSE YOU WILL
|
||
|
*BECOME* THAT QUALITY. This is a great rule to live by. Always try to
|
||
|
advertise your system on systems of a quality YOU'D like your system to
|
||
|
achieve, then people will think you are, and hence your system will become
|
||
|
that quality. So, if you want your system to be the next big name in the p/h
|
||
|
world, advertising it on your local clone of the "Streetfighter II BBS" (WHY
|
||
|
THE FUCK DOES EVERY SINGLE GOD DAMNED NPA HAVE ONE OF THESE???) is a bad
|
||
|
move.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well, once you've got your system up, advertised it, and got people calling,
|
||
|
you're pretty much set. Running the system on a day-to-day basis isn't as bad
|
||
|
as most people make it out to be. Sure, you've got to validate new users (and
|
||
|
delete the idiots), make sure posts are of sufficient quality and on-topic,
|
||
|
make sure files get uploaded to the right directories (WHY THE HELL DO SO
|
||
|
MANY PEOPLE FIND IT SO DIFFICULT TO UPLOAD THINGS TO THE RIGHT SPOT???), and
|
||
|
so on.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Good luck to you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
<pazuzu@netcom.com>
|
||
|
>> EOF <<
|
||
|
|
||
|
|