558 lines
32 KiB
Plaintext
558 lines
32 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|||
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|||
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|||
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|||
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|||
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|||
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
March 1, 1992
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
SWEET4B.ASC
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Guy Resh.
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Vacuum, Spacetime, Frame, and All That
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
You also have to make the notion of "spacetime" less mysterious.
|
|||
|
|
It's just vacuum, by the way, and potential, and energy. It's
|
|||
|
|
also used in two different senses: (1) In general, when a
|
|||
|
|
specific frame has not been imposed or selected, and (2) in
|
|||
|
|
specific, when a specific frame has been imposed and selected.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
When the specific frame is imposed, you've already assumed that
|
|||
|
|
you know the conditions and ordering of the vacuum for the whole
|
|||
|
|
universe, that the distance between every two points (and the
|
|||
|
|
time between them) has been rigorously measured and determined
|
|||
|
|
and fixed, etc. You've already assumed the fundamental operation
|
|||
|
|
of the entire universe, its physics, everything! So beware of
|
|||
|
|
thinking just in a fixed frame. In that sort of thinking, you've
|
|||
|
|
got a lot of built-in, sweeping, global assumptions that will
|
|||
|
|
elude your recognition unless you're careful. Many scientists
|
|||
|
|
don't realize this. They think in one frame at a time, and then
|
|||
|
|
make grand pronouncements about the entire nature of the
|
|||
|
|
universe, not realizing that they already assumed those answers
|
|||
|
|
in the first place.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
So watch out for the trap of assuming that "space" and
|
|||
|
|
"spacetime" and "vacuum" are all synonymous with "frame" and
|
|||
|
|
"spacetime frame." They're not. Vacuum per se doesn't have any
|
|||
|
|
fixed length and time; the observer's mass reaction with the
|
|||
|
|
vacuum potential determines and makes those quantities.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Speed of Light Is Not a Universal Constant
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The speed of light in vacuum is also not a universal constant.
|
|||
|
|
[46] Sorry about that. The speed of light in a given, specific
|
|||
|
|
vacuum of specific potential magnitude is constant. Note that to
|
|||
|
|
first order the vacuum is just electrostatic scalar potential and
|
|||
|
|
therefore just virtual photon flux. The intensity of VPF flux is
|
|||
|
|
the electrical charge density. So the speed of light in a given,
|
|||
|
|
specific vacuum of specific electrical charge is constant. But
|
|||
|
|
if you change the vacuum's ambient electrical charge density __
|
|||
|
|
i.e., change the value of that vacuum potential's magnitude __
|
|||
|
|
you can make light passing through go faster or slower, depending
|
|||
|
|
upon whether you decreased or increased the vacuum charge
|
|||
|
|
density. [47]
|
|||
|
|
Page 1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In fact, you can make local time go much faster or much slower,
|
|||
|
|
if you take the time to substantially activate the mass
|
|||
|
|
potential, because the VPF exchange between vacuum and mass
|
|||
|
|
(nucleus) is far greater in the mass potential than in any other
|
|||
|
|
kind of potential. I was once involved in an unplanned
|
|||
|
|
experiment where, after several hours of Frank Golden's charging
|
|||
|
|
the area with two powerful scalar EM wave generators, we messed
|
|||
|
|
up all the clocks in the area __ grandfather mechanical pendulum
|
|||
|
|
clocks, electric watches and clocks, mechanical windup clocks and
|
|||
|
|
watches, battery-operated clocks, everything __ because we
|
|||
|
|
altered the ambient "mass potential" of the area. We charged up
|
|||
|
|
or activated all the local mass, and in doing so we made a zone
|
|||
|
|
in which time flowed at a somewhat different rate. There were
|
|||
|
|
other phenomena which I am not at liberty to discuss. It
|
|||
|
|
required four days for the activation to discharge, and things to
|
|||
|
|
return to normal.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Multiple Nature of "the" Ambient Vacuum
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Another problem is that "the" ambient laboratory vacuum we
|
|||
|
|
normally have or consider is really jillions and jillions of
|
|||
|
|
vacua, simultaneously, in interference with each other.
|
|||
|
|
Spacetime, to the first order you see, is just electrostatic
|
|||
|
|
scalar potential. (It's just scalar potential, to nth order,
|
|||
|
|
without restriction to considering just virtual photons and
|
|||
|
|
electromagnetics.). Since that potential isn't adequately
|
|||
|
|
defined in physics or EE either, I'm sending some papers with
|
|||
|
|
proper definitions.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Actually, scalar potentials (Vacua! Spacetimes!) from charged
|
|||
|
|
particles __ both static and dynamic __ all over the universe are
|
|||
|
|
continually interfering in each differential volume of the
|
|||
|
|
observer's spacetime. Whittaker's first paper tells us how the
|
|||
|
|
hidden EM energy flows between any point and every other point in
|
|||
|
|
the universe, right through each of these potentials from distant
|
|||
|
|
sources. By Whittaker's 2nd paper (1904), the local interference
|
|||
|
|
of these potentials generates continual scalar potential
|
|||
|
|
gradients __ EM forcefields, if you will, when you stick a
|
|||
|
|
measuring charge in the gradient to provide observable charged
|
|||
|
|
particle translation [which is what the E-field, e.g., is defined
|
|||
|
|
in terms of]. The rapidity of the interfering changes in the
|
|||
|
|
local vacuum potentials is phenomenal, but the interference is
|
|||
|
|
totally deterministic. However, all the fine-grained information
|
|||
|
|
is totally lost to the observer. Hence it appears to him to be
|
|||
|
|
statistical.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Generation of Zero-Point EM Fluctuations
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Note that, in the differential of local spacetime vacuum that we
|
|||
|
|
are examining, "the" vacuum/potential is actually incredible
|
|||
|
|
numbers of dynamically changing vacua/potentials, all in violent
|
|||
|
|
interferometry a la Whittaker's second paper. In other words,
|
|||
|
|
"the" ambient vacuum is really not just "a" single vacuum, but
|
|||
|
|
many, many, many dynamic vacua all at once, and all in
|
|||
|
|
interference. By Whittaker 1904, their interference (as scalar
|
|||
|
|
potentials) is what deterministically produces the local highly
|
|||
|
|
noisy virtual EM field gradients __ the zero-point EM energy of
|
|||
|
|
the quantum mechanical vacuum.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Puthoff's Cosmological Feedback Principle
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Puthoff referred to this vacuum situation of individually
|
|||
|
|
deterministic but conglomerated statistical local EM fluctuation
|
|||
|
|
effects, from the potential energies of the distant charged
|
|||
|
|
particles of the universe, as a cosmological feedback principle.
|
|||
|
|
You should also read Puthoff's articles, as cited in my papers,
|
|||
|
|
and perhaps some of his references dealing with the exploding
|
|||
|
|
field of stochastic electrodynamics (SED). The only present
|
|||
|
|
problem with SED is that its practitioners have not yet
|
|||
|
|
discovered Whittaker's two papers (1903 and 1904), and therefore
|
|||
|
|
do not incorporate nature's highly organized internal
|
|||
|
|
electromagnetics.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Adding a Potential to "the" Vacuum Potential
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
When you make "a" potential, you make "a single"
|
|||
|
|
spacetime/vacuum. That's sitting on top of (adding to the
|
|||
|
|
magnitude of), or lowered into (decreasing the magnitude of), the
|
|||
|
|
conglomerated "ambient vacuum potential" that is the "normal
|
|||
|
|
vacuum." That added scalar EM potential is a beautifully
|
|||
|
|
organized, EM, spatiotemporal lattice, per Whittaker's 1903
|
|||
|
|
paper. It's filled with organized, phase-locked, EM energy
|
|||
|
|
waves; it is not a random mishmash at all. You must understand
|
|||
|
|
that. You can organize and engineer local spacetime itself, and
|
|||
|
|
even do it at a distance.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Solution to the Missing Chaos of Quantum Mechanics
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In fact, when you add a potential to the ambient vacuum (to the
|
|||
|
|
ambient vacuum potential), you add something that is perfectly
|
|||
|
|
ordered to the statistical "ambient vacua." Thus you have added
|
|||
|
|
hidden order into the local statistics. That's the missing chaos
|
|||
|
|
in quantum mechanics __ the hidden order that everyone's been
|
|||
|
|
desperately looking for.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Spacetime Is Energy
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
At any rate, the ambient vacuum is "spacetime," and is (to first
|
|||
|
|
order) a conglomerated scalar EM potential, of very high value.
|
|||
|
|
Please read that statement again. Then read the definitions of
|
|||
|
|
energy, scalar potential, and electrostatic scalar potential,
|
|||
|
|
that we have included in a footnote to this paper. Notice that
|
|||
|
|
vacuum/spacetime is pure energy __ and to first order, pure EM
|
|||
|
|
energy. So we are like a bird on an electrical high line; we
|
|||
|
|
live directly in an extremely high potential, but not in a
|
|||
|
|
potential gradient. That's a flat spacetime; it has the same
|
|||
|
|
ambient "potential" magnitude everywhere. If you change the
|
|||
|
|
ambient potential of the local vacuum from point to point in the
|
|||
|
|
neighborhood, that's a curved local spacetime. Imagine ST
|
|||
|
|
curvature as a change in the "virtual ambient pressure" of the
|
|||
|
|
local vacuum. That "ambient pressure" can be increased or
|
|||
|
|
decreased, hence the two "curvatures." Simple as that. You can
|
|||
|
|
curve it in two ways: (1) increase the local ambient value of the
|
|||
|
|
vacuum potential, or (2) decrease the local ambient value of the
|
|||
|
|
vacuum potential. So local ST curvature really isn't any big
|
|||
|
|
deal. And you can do it on the lab bench.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 3
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Trapped EM Energy Is Gravitational Potential
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
As is well-known in general relativity, it is the trapped energy
|
|||
|
|
in mass that is responsible for its exhibiting gravitational
|
|||
|
|
attraction. Again, Einstein's E = mc(exp2) is a prescription for
|
|||
|
|
the amount of electromagnetic energy that is trapped in a mass m.
|
|||
|
|
An electrostatic scalar potential is just one where the EM energy
|
|||
|
|
is trapped (see the first Whittaker paper, 1903, for the EM wave
|
|||
|
|
form in which it is trapped). So if trapped energy is
|
|||
|
|
gravitational in mass, it is gravitational in the potential as
|
|||
|
|
well. In GR, all potentials are therefore gravitational. In
|
|||
|
|
fact, there is no such separate thing as "the" gravitational
|
|||
|
|
potential; "the" G-potential is made from a conglomerate of other
|
|||
|
|
fields/field effects, which is Sakharov's hypothesis [48]. To
|
|||
|
|
first order, the G-potential is a function of the trapped local
|
|||
|
|
EM energy density of the vacuum.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Quantum Potential: Action At a Distance
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
You must also at least get acquainted with the quantum potential,
|
|||
|
|
and its place in hidden variable quantum mechanics theory. The
|
|||
|
|
quantum potential (QP) is a potential added to the Schroedinger
|
|||
|
|
potential. It provides an instantaneous connection between
|
|||
|
|
separated components, even over great distances. The QP appears
|
|||
|
|
to have no point source, in sharp contrast to the classical
|
|||
|
|
potential. The QP field is not radiated in the classical sense.
|
|||
|
|
In general the QP between two particles (or two components of a
|
|||
|
|
system exhibiting a macroscopic QP) does not produce a vanishing
|
|||
|
|
interaction between the particles (or components) as their
|
|||
|
|
spatial separation becomes very large. The QP contains an
|
|||
|
|
instantaneous connection between separated components of the
|
|||
|
|
system, rather than the retarded connection provided by the
|
|||
|
|
classical potential. Thus with a QP, two widely separated
|
|||
|
|
components of a physical system may be strongly and directly
|
|||
|
|
connected. The QP of a system depends on the quantum state of
|
|||
|
|
the system as a whole, even when its parts are greatly separated.
|
|||
|
|
In the case of a QP established by separated electronic
|
|||
|
|
equipments, the QP depends on the "structured graviton" state of
|
|||
|
|
all the radiative components, circuits, devices, transmitters,
|
|||
|
|
etc. [49][50]
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
As Trapped EM Energy, Mass Is a Special Scalar EM Potential
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Since (see definitions in the footnotes to this paper) trapped EM
|
|||
|
|
energy is also a scalar EM potential, then it follows that the
|
|||
|
|
mass (of the nucleus or a fundamental particle) can be regarded
|
|||
|
|
as, and is, a special kind of very, very intense scalar EM
|
|||
|
|
potential. I call it the mass potential to differentiate it
|
|||
|
|
because of its fantastic strength. Not only is the mass
|
|||
|
|
potential a scalar EM potential, but it is also a gravitational
|
|||
|
|
potential. Note that the concept of the mass potential is a
|
|||
|
|
unifying field concept, for unifying gravity and EM fields.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The beauty of the mass potential concept is fourfold: (1) Now
|
|||
|
|
mass has a universal kind of organized EM internal structure,
|
|||
|
|
given by Whittaker's 1903 paper, that comprises the mass in the
|
|||
|
|
first place, (2) the hidden internal EM structure of the mass
|
|||
|
|
potential can be changed and engineered at will,
|
|||
|
|
electromagnetically, by external means and directly, (3) we now
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 4
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
have direct electrogravitation, opening up the vista of directly
|
|||
|
|
engineering antigravity (as Sweet has already proven in his
|
|||
|
|
vacuum triode device) [51], and (4) the internal structure of the
|
|||
|
|
nuclear mass potential can be deliberately altered in a
|
|||
|
|
nonequilibrium manner vis a vis its virtual photon flux (VPF)
|
|||
|
|
exchange with its local vacuum, as can be the VPF of the local
|
|||
|
|
vacuum itself. In that case, you have created a local vacuum
|
|||
|
|
engine in the altered Whittaker vacuum/potential, and you have
|
|||
|
|
also created an activated interacting engine of the altered
|
|||
|
|
atomic nucleus (its mass potential), fed by vacuum energy, and
|
|||
|
|
gating the energy out of the atom to do marvelous things __ to do
|
|||
|
|
whatever you've been clever enough to design it to do in the
|
|||
|
|
first place! You can transmute elements, materialize and
|
|||
|
|
dematerialize matter, alter and change a radioactive nucleus's
|
|||
|
|
energy balance and characteristics so that it is inert, etc.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Gravitational Energy Is Negative Energy
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Finally, you must be aware that gravitational energy is negative
|
|||
|
|
energy, since it is "withdrawn" from the EM scattering energy
|
|||
|
|
domain, and scattering EM energy has been designated as positive.
|
|||
|
|
You can understand that G-energy is negative, in this fashion,
|
|||
|
|
after Nahin [52]: If two like electrical charges are brought
|
|||
|
|
together, energy is required to overcome the repulsion, and this
|
|||
|
|
energy "goes into the field" to give a positive energy density of
|
|||
|
|
space. Two positive masses, however, attract each other; it
|
|||
|
|
takes the exertion of energy to keep them apart. In other words,
|
|||
|
|
the field energy is negative in this case. [53] Maxwell was much
|
|||
|
|
perplexed by this problem, as was Heaviside __ and as have been
|
|||
|
|
many other physicists.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Engineering Physical Reality Itself
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In summary of this scalar EM approach, there are literally no
|
|||
|
|
limits that cannot be overcome. It just requires us to now
|
|||
|
|
explore and develop the phenomenology, advance the theory and
|
|||
|
|
approach, learn how to design and implement what we wish the
|
|||
|
|
activated mass and activated vacuum to do, etc. We can change
|
|||
|
|
the so-called "laws of nature" in an area __ or even for the
|
|||
|
|
whole earth __ as we wish, using this approach. It doesn't
|
|||
|
|
matter whether we're ready for it or not; the Creator has now
|
|||
|
|
laid in our hands the power to alter and engineer physical
|
|||
|
|
reality itself, as we may wish.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Nonlinear Oscillation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
One also needs to be aware of nonlinear oscillator theory. [54]
|
|||
|
|
One will encounter in scalar EM the effects of nonlinear
|
|||
|
|
oscillation, including harmonic and subharmonic oscillation,
|
|||
|
|
self-oscillation, etc. The organized graviton structure of a
|
|||
|
|
scalar potential is organized (and in fact phase-locked) in terms
|
|||
|
|
of both harmonic and subharmonic oscillation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Mind and Matter and Their Interaction
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Without further amplification, we will also state that mind,
|
|||
|
|
matter, thought, and the deepest living biological control
|
|||
|
|
functions also utilize the Whittaker internal electromagnetics,
|
|||
|
|
and have done so since the beginning. We now know where the
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 5
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
software is, how it is filed, and how to go about engineering it
|
|||
|
|
directly. We have already advanced the precise mechanism for
|
|||
|
|
Sheldrake's morphogenetic field, and explained how it generates a
|
|||
|
|
change in a species in a complete evolutionary "jump." We state
|
|||
|
|
without further elaboration that specific, testable mechanisms
|
|||
|
|
for parapsychology can also be extracted from the scalar EM
|
|||
|
|
approach. What is involved here is not only a unification of the
|
|||
|
|
branches of physics, but also a unification of physics and
|
|||
|
|
metaphysics.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Biological Effects of EM Fields and Radiation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
As is well-known, the question of whether or not EM fields and
|
|||
|
|
radiation may contribute to incidences of leukemia, brain tumors,
|
|||
|
|
and other health changes is unresolved. Four decades of the best
|
|||
|
|
technical efforts of many able researchers, together with the
|
|||
|
|
entire body of experimental data they have gathered, has been
|
|||
|
|
unable to technically and decisively resolve the issue. The
|
|||
|
|
studies and experiments have continued to be contradictory and
|
|||
|
|
inconsistent, and replication of results has continued to be
|
|||
|
|
difficult and often impossible. What the experimental results
|
|||
|
|
actually show is that there are uncontrolled and unknown EM
|
|||
|
|
variables in the experiments, hence in the experimental model
|
|||
|
|
being applied __ either consciously or unconsciously __ by the
|
|||
|
|
experimenters.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The standard experimental model (SEM) that EM/bioeffects
|
|||
|
|
researchers apply, either wittingly or unwittingly, rests on two
|
|||
|
|
major postulates, that: (1) the present theoretical model of
|
|||
|
|
electromagnetics is correct and complete, and sufficient to
|
|||
|
|
characterize both the EM stimulus to the biological system and
|
|||
|
|
the causative mechanism for biological effects, and (2) the gross
|
|||
|
|
EM dosage/response model __ energy deposition, or "heat" by
|
|||
|
|
another name __ used in the measurement instrumentation
|
|||
|
|
adequately characterizes EM stimulus/bioresponse, for measuring
|
|||
|
|
and interpreting the factors and results of the experiments.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Both fundamental postulates are seriously in error, and the
|
|||
|
|
standard experimental model is therefore seriously invalid.
|
|||
|
|
Using the SEM by rote for four and a half decades has resulted in
|
|||
|
|
the present state of confusion, inconclusiveness, conflict, and
|
|||
|
|
indeterminacy in the field. Mostly what the experimenters have
|
|||
|
|
really shown to date is that: (1) their own experimental model is
|
|||
|
|
hopelessly flawed, (2) their instruments and instrumental methods
|
|||
|
|
are inadequate, and (3) the classical EM theoretical model is
|
|||
|
|
inadequate for their experimental tasks.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Living systems have long used the internal EM Whittaker channel
|
|||
|
|
for deep cellular control of the organism. By manipulating this
|
|||
|
|
channel, Kaznacheyev [55] showed EM induction of cellular death
|
|||
|
|
and disease into environmentally protected cell cultures. [56]
|
|||
|
|
Priore [57] demonstrated __ under rigorous scientific controls
|
|||
|
|
[58] __ absolute cures of terminal tumors and leukemias in
|
|||
|
|
laboratory animals. Popp [59] also discovered the master
|
|||
|
|
cellular control system, including its virtual photon storage
|
|||
|
|
characteristics, without knowing of the internal Whittaker
|
|||
|
|
storage channel and mechanism.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 6
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Quantum mechanically it has been known since 1959 that the EM
|
|||
|
|
potentials are the primary causes of electromagnetic phenomena,
|
|||
|
|
[60] and the force fields are only secondary __ the exact
|
|||
|
|
opposite of what has been assumed in the classical EM theory
|
|||
|
|
utilized by present experimenters in the SEM. Whittaker's
|
|||
|
|
fundamental decomposition of the scalar EM potential into an
|
|||
|
|
internal harmonic set of paired bidirectional planar EM waves
|
|||
|
|
provides a rich set of experimentally and theoretically
|
|||
|
|
unaccounted and uncontrolled hidden EM variables involved in all
|
|||
|
|
EM bioeffects experiments to date. The scalar EM potential is an
|
|||
|
|
organized spacetime lattice of perfectly ordered EM energy,
|
|||
|
|
passing through it in a Whittaker wave structure. Living systems
|
|||
|
|
alter this internal EM Whittaker channel (this spacetime lattice
|
|||
|
|
structure) and communicate through it for mind, thought,
|
|||
|
|
personality, long-term memory, and deep control of cellular and
|
|||
|
|
body functions. All the deepest biological control systems are
|
|||
|
|
in the Whittaker channel. To understand environmental-EM
|
|||
|
|
bioeffects, you've got to understand how the local environmental
|
|||
|
|
EM (both internal and external) affects and alters the Whittaker
|
|||
|
|
channel, and hence the deep biocontrol systems utilizing it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
These hidden Whittaker EM variables are real; that is testable
|
|||
|
|
and unassailable. The unknown Whittaker EM variables also
|
|||
|
|
account for most if not all the serious deficiencies and problems
|
|||
|
|
of the entire experimental field to date. Scalar interferometry
|
|||
|
|
of Whittaker potentials alone, e.g., can reproduce any kind of
|
|||
|
|
normal EM, [61] and the potentials can pass deep into the body
|
|||
|
|
before that interference occurs. So Whittaker potential
|
|||
|
|
interferometry can produce much deeper EM fields in the body than
|
|||
|
|
present field theory and dosimetry would indicate. Even worse,
|
|||
|
|
the Whittaker potentials interact in the nuclear mass potential
|
|||
|
|
of the body __ and that is where the signals and functions for
|
|||
|
|
deep cellular control, immune system control, etc. are located.
|
|||
|
|
Interfering EM signals (multiphoton effects) in the external
|
|||
|
|
environment create sporadic Whittaker potentials, with "noisy"
|
|||
|
|
and often abnormally strong EM hidden variable structures.
|
|||
|
|
Repetitious noise patterns in the Whittaker channel gradually
|
|||
|
|
"activate" or "charge up" the Whittaker channel of the organism.
|
|||
|
|
Thus a sort of long-term "electronic jamming" of the deep control
|
|||
|
|
systems of the body can result. Gradual degradation of the
|
|||
|
|
immune system and of the cellular control system can result.
|
|||
|
|
Thus there does exist a mechanism for long-term, cumulative
|
|||
|
|
damage to the biological system.. The basic probability of the
|
|||
|
|
multiphoton mechanism occurring for long-term effects cumulation
|
|||
|
|
and slow bio-degradation is primarily a function of the signal
|
|||
|
|
density in the specific environment, regardless of individual
|
|||
|
|
signal strength or frequency. This "electronic smog" effect is
|
|||
|
|
presently unknown in biophysics, and it has not been accounted
|
|||
|
|
for at all in the present experiments and studies in the EM
|
|||
|
|
bioeffects field. Long-term presence of specific multifrequency
|
|||
|
|
mixtures then can produce more specific short-term, medium-term,
|
|||
|
|
and long-term effects, in addition to the general degradation
|
|||
|
|
cumulating from sheer local environmental signal densities.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Submitted for consideration to a major 1992 scientific symposium
|
|||
|
|
is a paper pointing out the fundamental difficulties with the
|
|||
|
|
standard experimental model, and the exact Whittaker nature of
|
|||
|
|
the uncontrolled hidden variables responsible for negating over
|
|||
|
|
four decades of painstaking scientific experiments. Also the
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 8
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
paper points out the precise things that have to be done to
|
|||
|
|
correct the SEM, the instrumentation, and the EM theoretical
|
|||
|
|
model, so that future experiments will be decisive, consistent,
|
|||
|
|
and replicable.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If the paper is accepted, then in August 1992 we will place into
|
|||
|
|
the scientific literature precisely what is wrong with the EM
|
|||
|
|
bioeffects field to date, and will attempt to correct the entire
|
|||
|
|
field by stimulating it to account for and measure the internal
|
|||
|
|
EM Whittaker variables that are presently hidden and
|
|||
|
|
uncontrolled. With such correction, hopefully we can avoid yet
|
|||
|
|
another four decades of indeterminate, inconclusive,
|
|||
|
|
inconsistent, and contradictory experimental effort, and also
|
|||
|
|
remove much of the present researcher frustration.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Aristotelian Logic and Excessive Worship of Mathematics
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
One will also desperately need to change one's mindset on
|
|||
|
|
Aristotelian logic __ which nature often violates __ and one must
|
|||
|
|
get rid of the false notion that "mathematics contains
|
|||
|
|
fundamental truth, a priori." Mathematics is just a game and a
|
|||
|
|
model __ though a very, very useful one __ based on assumptions
|
|||
|
|
(postulates) which we ourselves formulate and build-in to it.
|
|||
|
|
The only real "truth content" of the mathematics is judged by the
|
|||
|
|
validity of the postulates. Mathematics is no better or worse
|
|||
|
|
than the concepts assumed as its basis. If there's any truth in
|
|||
|
|
it, it's only what we ourselves have put into it. That's the
|
|||
|
|
reason for the experimental method in science; the only way a
|
|||
|
|
theory can be falsified or validated is by experimental
|
|||
|
|
examination and test.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
So get rid of the artificial mystique of "mathematics is truth,
|
|||
|
|
and the purest activity of the human mind." That's dogma and
|
|||
|
|
religion, not science. It is a must to read Morris Kline. [62]
|
|||
|
|
Also read about G. Spencer Brown's extension of logic to include
|
|||
|
|
complex numbers. [63] Then read my own fundamental correction
|
|||
|
|
to Aristotelian logic by addition of a fourth law and an
|
|||
|
|
applications rule. [64] With this background, one should be free
|
|||
|
|
from the "Aristotelian trap" and the unwarranted "worship of
|
|||
|
|
mathematics" trap. We need the mathematics as a useful tool; but
|
|||
|
|
we must not think that to be highly mathematical is to
|
|||
|
|
necessarily have an advanced grip on the truth. In physics
|
|||
|
|
today, too often one loses the real physics because of the over
|
|||
|
|
attachment to the beauty of the mathematics.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The physics of a theory is embodied in the fundamental concepts
|
|||
|
|
associated with the mathematical symbols, not in the mathematical
|
|||
|
|
manipulation of those symbols. The mathematics isn't the
|
|||
|
|
physics; the math is just the manipulation of the physics. Don't
|
|||
|
|
confuse the fundamental physics of a theory with the mathematics
|
|||
|
|
of the theory. The mathematics can be great, and the physics
|
|||
|
|
still quite wrong.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Background For a New Paradigm
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The above "blast" should give you a feel for my work, and the
|
|||
|
|
background for the area. In your normal studies, you will also
|
|||
|
|
get a course in special relativity, certainly by the time you get
|
|||
|
|
your master's degree. If you major in physics, you will also
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 8
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
take one or more courses in general relativity in the curriculum
|
|||
|
|
for the doctorate. For either the master's or doctorate degrees,
|
|||
|
|
you will probably have at least one introductory course in
|
|||
|
|
quantum mechanics, or perhaps more. That's quite sufficient for
|
|||
|
|
understanding in this area and working in it. To assist a shift
|
|||
|
|
in mindset, however, one also needs to read __ particularly at
|
|||
|
|
the beginning __ a lot of popularized Scientific American type
|
|||
|
|
articles on quantum mechanics, the vacuum, zero-point energy of
|
|||
|
|
vacuum, etc. Also read the popularized books by Heinz Pagels and
|
|||
|
|
Nick Herbert's Quantum Reality. Read them at least two or three
|
|||
|
|
times. Read Paul Davies' books; even though popularized, he is a
|
|||
|
|
master craftsman, and able to clearly state the gist of the broad
|
|||
|
|
array of present physics. In all of your reading, it's just as
|
|||
|
|
important to notice what is wrong, awkward, assumed, or imperfect
|
|||
|
|
as it is to notice what is known correctly. If you haven't read
|
|||
|
|
a good book on foundations of physics, at least read Lindsay and
|
|||
|
|
Margenau. [65]
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Personals
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
As far as your career plans, it would be best to either seek your
|
|||
|
|
Doctorate in EE as you plan to, with a minor in physics, or else
|
|||
|
|
major in physics with a minor in something else such as EE. Just
|
|||
|
|
keep your mind open and not brainwashed, in either case. If you
|
|||
|
|
stay open-minded, most of your learning is going to occur after
|
|||
|
|
your doctorate anyway.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Thanks for your interest, and the best of luck to you. And yes,
|
|||
|
|
more and more youngsters, grad students, post-docs, and even
|
|||
|
|
a few senior professors are turning to this scalar potential EM,
|
|||
|
|
and I'm absolutely delighted. As they digest the Whittaker
|
|||
|
|
papers and the other papers, gradually they'll start to work and
|
|||
|
|
change physics. That's the only way we're going to get a new
|
|||
|
|
science. As Max Planck pointed out, essentially the only way you
|
|||
|
|
get a new physics is when the old physicists who so adamantly
|
|||
|
|
oppose and block it die off. The future will be determined by
|
|||
|
|
the young.
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|||
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|||
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|||
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|||
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|||
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Page 9
|