140 lines
6.9 KiB
Plaintext
140 lines
6.9 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
Basic explosives
|
||
|
|
||
|
This will be the most informative discussion on theoretical and practical
|
||
|
pyrotechnics that I can deliver in a relatively short phile.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I don' reccomend that anyone uses this information to create any illegal
|
||
|
explosives or weapons. It is in fact, not a good idea to use explosive devices
|
||
|
to inflict personal or property damage because of the possibility of hurting
|
||
|
yourself or innocent people. Any explosive is dangerous, and should be handled
|
||
|
only by proffesionals.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We'll start with the basics:
|
||
|
There's basically two categories of explosives: high explosives, and low
|
||
|
explosives. High explosives are also called detonating, and low eplosives
|
||
|
referred to as burning mixtures. The difference between detonation and burning,
|
||
|
is that a burning mixture simply burns at a very fast rate, usually not
|
||
|
exceeding the speed of sound, needing other methods to actually produce an
|
||
|
explosion. Detonation, on the other hand, occurs almost simultaneously
|
||
|
thru out the whole mass of the mixture. The main difference between the two,
|
||
|
chemically, is proximity of the oxidizing and reducing compounds. In detonating
|
||
|
mixtures, the oxygen is bound rather loosely to the reducing agent (the stuff
|
||
|
that wants to burn using the oxygen), so loosely in fact, that it takes very
|
||
|
little external energy to brek them apart. This chemical composition is an
|
||
|
actual molecular bond as opposed to the simple mixture of burning explosives.
|
||
|
This means that the oxygen is alot closer to the reducing agent, hence, it is
|
||
|
much easier to utilize. It should be pointed out, that although the bonds in a
|
||
|
detonating molecule are loose, they require a great deal of energy to keep them
|
||
|
bound. The greater the tension contained in these bonds, the more powerful the
|
||
|
detonation will be, once they are broken apart Because of these differences,
|
||
|
in order for a low explosive to explode, it must be contained in a very strong
|
||
|
enclosure. Here, enough pressure and heat can be built up to force the oxygen
|
||
|
and reducer together, and result in a chain reaction. This is why firecrackers
|
||
|
have many layers of paper around the chemicals. In a pipe bomb, the resulting
|
||
|
explosion is usually much more powerful, owing in part to the much stronger
|
||
|
enclosure. A pipe bomb, however, is extremely dangerous due to the schrapnel
|
||
|
effect. High explosives, although they usually can be detonated without being
|
||
|
enclosed, are more powerful when they are confined.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If all this seems confusing, it will be explained a little better later.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here are some examples of the compounds used in low or burning explosives.
|
||
|
1.oxidizers (listed in increasing level of power):
|
||
|
A.Sodium nitrate
|
||
|
B.Sodium chlorate
|
||
|
C.Ammonium nitrate
|
||
|
D.Potassium bichromate
|
||
|
E.Potassium nitrate
|
||
|
F.Potassium bichlorate
|
||
|
G.Potassium chlorate
|
||
|
H.A whole slew of other ones
|
||
|
2.Reducers:
|
||
|
A.Sulfer
|
||
|
B.Charcoal
|
||
|
C.Aluminum
|
||
|
D.Magnesium
|
||
|
E.Titanium
|
||
|
F.Almost anything else that burns.
|
||
|
|
||
|
These chemicals are mixed in varying proportions to produce the desired
|
||
|
effect. The formula varies according to the amount of oxygen in the selected
|
||
|
oxydizer and the heat at which the selected reducer burns at. Titanium burns
|
||
|
the hottest, and Potassium chlorate produces the most oxygen. These two will
|
||
|
burn the fastest when mixed together. One thing I forgot to mention: the heat
|
||
|
from the burning reducer is what releases the oxygen from the oxydizer. The
|
||
|
hotter the oxydizer gets, the more oxygen it releases.
|
||
|
If you ever decide to mix any of these chemicals, DO NOT COMPRESS, SCRAPE,
|
||
|
OR MAKE ANY SPARKS. Potassium chlorate especially, will combine with sulfur at
|
||
|
the drop of a hat- sometimes with out any heat or pressure. Potassium chlorate
|
||
|
should be avoided if at all possible. Potassium bichlorate is almost as
|
||
|
powerful, but more stable. It is the choice of professional fireworks
|
||
|
manufacturers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One formula for the mixture used in pro fireworks:
|
||
|
1 part sulfur
|
||
|
1 part aluminum (titanium is better but costlier)
|
||
|
2 parts potassium bichlorate
|
||
|
these quantities are by weight.
|
||
|
|
||
|
These materials are all very finely divided. The aluminum or titanium should be
|
||
|
at least 400 mesh, with 600 mesh burning much faster.
|
||
|
Also, if you mess around with this stuff, wear a surgical mask. The metal dust is
|
||
|
very damaging to your lungs and can kill you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Enough of that. Let's move on to high explosives.
|
||
|
There are 3 kinds of high explosives:Primary, booster and secondary. Primary
|
||
|
explosives are extremely sensitive to shock, vibration, heat, electricity, and
|
||
|
probably insults. PRIMARY explosives are usually contained in a small metal
|
||
|
tube and electrically ignited. They are used to initiate another, less
|
||
|
sensitive high explosive, called the SECONDARY explosive. Sometimes, the
|
||
|
secondary explosive is so insensitive, it needs a BOOSTER explosive to set it
|
||
|
off. In other words, the primary sets off the booster , which sets off the
|
||
|
secondary. This process is known as the explosive train. Booster explosives are
|
||
|
often secondary explosives themselves
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here are some examples of primary explosives:
|
||
|
A. Mercury fulminate
|
||
|
B. Lead azide
|
||
|
C. ALmost any azide
|
||
|
D. Lead picrate
|
||
|
E. Lead styphnate
|
||
|
F. DDNP
|
||
|
G. HMTD
|
||
|
H. TACC (Tetraminecopper (II) chlorate)
|
||
|
I. Double salts
|
||
|
|
||
|
Examples of booster and secondary explosives
|
||
|
A. Nitroglycerine (actually glyceroltrinitrate)
|
||
|
B. TNT (trinitrotoluene)
|
||
|
C. RDX/Cyclonite/Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX= Research Department Explosive)
|
||
|
D. PBX
|
||
|
E. PETN (pentarythritoltetranitrate)
|
||
|
F. Nitrostarch
|
||
|
G. Cellulose nitrate(guncotton)
|
||
|
H. Ammonium nitrate
|
||
|
I. Potassium chlorate
|
||
|
J. Amatol
|
||
|
K. Urea nitrate
|
||
|
L. Reportadly, a liquid made from hydrazine and ammonium nitrate
|
||
|
M. A whole slew of others
|
||
|
|
||
|
Contrary to some opinion, nitroglycerine is the most powerful of all
|
||
|
explosives known. Some might have more shattering power (brisance), but 'nitro
|
||
|
is the standard against which all other explosives are measured.
|
||
|
I will explain how alot of these explosives are made in a later installation.
|
||
|
One primary/secondary combination that merits attention now is HMTD/RDX. The
|
||
|
rason that this combo is remarkable, is that both explosives are made from the
|
||
|
same base compound. This compound is hexamethylenetetramine. The HMTD is made
|
||
|
using hexamethylenetetramine, hydrogen peroxide, and citric acid. The RDX is
|
||
|
made using hexamethylenetetramine, nitric acid, and acetic anhydride. HMTD is
|
||
|
very reliable and easy to make (and very sensitive). RDX is one of the most
|
||
|
powerful explosives, having 94% power of 'nitro, and about 30% more brissance.
|
||
|
The acetic anhydride can be ommited resulting in only about 40% efficiancy
|
||
|
( it takes alot more of the other chemicals to make the same amount of final
|
||
|
product. That will be all till next time. If there are any questions, leave
|
||
|
me E-mail and I will answer promptly.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
DOWNLOADED FROM P-80 SYSTEMS 304-744-2253
|
||
|
|